Not exact matches
The January - to - March quarter was the nation's warmest three - month start
since at least 1895, with an
average temperature of 42.01 degrees Fahrenheit — six degrees warmer
than the long - term
average, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Although the
temperature was 0.4 °F (0.2 °C) higher
than the 1981 - 2010
average, summer 2014 was the coolest
since 2005 for Austria
since records began in 1884.
Naturally this article fails to mention that
since the hydrosphere is 271 times as massive as the atmosphere, if oceans are absorbing the heat they are likely to moderate AGW into a nonproblem, as the
average ocean
temperature has only changed by.1 degrees in 50 years, an amount that is probably smaller
than measurement error.
These events are also more tangible to the general public
than abstract statements of global
average temperature since it affects their everyday lives.
«The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) said global land surface
temperatures in January and April were likely the warmest
since records began in 1880, at more
than 1 degree Celsius higher
than average for those months.
Since the 19th century, sea level has shot up more
than 2 millimeters per year on
average, far faster
than other periods of global
temperature change.
The winter started warmer
than average with the December
temperature 4.1 °F above
average, the warmest December
since 1957.
Since Sept. 1,
temperatures have run 2.9 °F above
average in Baton Rouge and 2.8 °F warmer
than normal in New Orleans.
«It is thus extremely likely (> 95 % probability) that the greenhouse gas induced warming
since the mid-twentieth century was larger
than the observed rise in global
average temperatures, and extremely likely that anthropogenic forcings were by far the dominant cause of warming.
-- is it right to say that this study doesn't show any significative influence of anthropogenic, post -1970 warming on SLR,
since the SLR reacts mainly with a very large time constant and
averages the
temperature over a time much longer
than 40 years?
«The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) said global land surface
temperatures in January and April were likely the warmest
since records began in 1880, at more
than 1 degree Celsius higher
than average for those months.
[1] CO2 absorbs IR, is the main GHG, human emissions are increasing its concentration in the atmosphere, raising
temperatures globally; the second GHG, water vapor, exists in equilibrium with water / ice, would precipitate out if not for the CO2, so acts as a feedback;
since the oceans cover so much of the planet, water is a large positive feedback; melting snow and ice as the atmosphere warms decreases albedo, another positive feedback, biased toward the poles, which gives larger polar warming
than the global
average; decreasing the
temperature gradient from the equator to the poles is reducing the driving forces for the jetstream; the jetstream's meanders are increasing in amplitude and slowing, just like the lower Missippi River where its driving gradient decreases; the larger slower meanders increase the amplitude and duration of blocking highs, increasing drought and extreme
temperatures — and 30,000 + Europeans and 5,000 plus Russians die, and the US corn crop, Russian wheat crop, and Aussie wildland fire protection fails — or extreme rainfall floods the US, France, Pakistan, Thailand (driving up prices for disk drives — hows that for unexpected adverse impacts from AGW?)
More
than 95 % of the 5 yr running mean of the surface
temperature change
since 1850 can be replicated by an integration of the sunspot data (as a proxy for ocean heat content), departing from the
average value over the period of the sunspot record (~ 40SSN), plus the superimposition of a ~ 60 yr sinusoid representing the observed oceanic oscillations.
The global
average surface
temperature has risen between 0.6 °C and 0.7 °C
since the start of the twentieth century, and the rate of increase
since 1976 has been approximately three times faster
than the century - scale trend.»
Global warming does not mean no winter, it means winter start later, summer hotter, as Gary Peters said «The global
average surface
temperature has risen between 0.6 °C and 0.7 °C
since the start of the twentieth century, and the rate of increase
since 1976 has been approximately three times faster
than the century - scale trend.»
As far as this historic period is concerned, the reconstruction of past
temperatures based on deep boreholes in deep permafrost is one of the best past
temperature proxies we have (for the global regions with permafrost — polar regions and mountainous regions)-- as a signal of
average temperatures it's even more accurate
than historic direct measurements of the air
temperature,
since the earth's upper crust acts as a near perfect conservator of past
temperatures — given that no water circulation takes place, which is precisely the case in permafrost where by definition the water is frozen.
The
average temperature in Britain for 2006 was higher
than at any time
since records began in 1659.
The
average temperature increase is real and the effects are happening much more rapidly
than anything seen in the past 2000 years at a minimum and probably
since the last ice age around 12000 years ago.
The increase in these winds has caused eastern tropical Pacific cooling, amplified the Californian drought, accelerated sea level rise three times faster
than the global
average in the Western Pacific and has slowed the rise of global
average surface
temperatures since 2001.
It is extremely likely * that human activities have caused more
than half of the observed increase in global
average surface
temperature since the 1950s.
The effect of the 2007 cooling on the
average global
temperature over time was to negate the hardly unusual increase of a little more
than one degree centigrade
since about the 1890's.
«Another recent paper used a different NOAA ocean surface
temperature data set to find that
since 2003 the global
average ocean surface
temperature has been rising at a rate that is an order of magnitude smaller
than the rate of increase reported in Karl's paper.»
Since 1896, winter (January - February) precipitation has risen more
than 11 inches and the
average temperature has increased 1.6 degrees Fahrenheit, mostly due to higher winter lows.
Claims made by sceptics that the effects of the current ENO as it enters a negative episode,
since last year, yielded
temperature anomalies much lower
than in recent years (in fact, very much
average at near zero), have been waved away by alarmists claiming that they are the result of «natural variability».
So while it was a generally warmer (and drier)
than usual winter it also wasn't the warmest ever, with the official NIWA statement being «The nation - wide mean
temperature was 1.2 °C above the winter
average, based on NIWA's seven - station
temperature series, making this the warmest winter on record
since 1909.»
«The latest (February 2012) monthly global
temperature anomaly for the lower atmosphere was minus 0.12 degrees Celsius, slightly less
than the
average since the satellite record of
temperatures began in 1979.»
Citing the work of Dr. John Christy and Richard McNider at the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH), which compared climate model projections with
temperatures measured independently by satellites and weather balloons, he said «the
average warming predicted to have occurred
since 1979 (when the satellite data starts) is approximately three times larger
than what is being observed.»
Since 1900, the global
average temperature has risen by 0.7 degrees Celsius, and the northern hemisphere is substantially warmer
than at any point during the past 1,000 years.
The IPCC has a confidence level > 90 % that less
than 50 % of the observed increase in global
average temperatures since the mid-20th century is the result of non-anthropogenic external forcings and internal natural variability within the climate system.
Since the period 1880 - 1909 was roughly 0.2 °C warmer
than the mid-17th century pre-industrial
average temperature, the February 2016 global
average temperatures was actually 1.8 °C above the real pre-industrial
temperature.
During that same period,
average annual rainfall in New South Wales declined by 3.6 inches (92 millimeters).3 Scientists think the decline in autumn rainfall in southeast Australia
since the late 1950s may be partly due to increases in heat - trapping gases in Earth's atmosphere.3, 14 Major bushfires over southeast Australia are linked to the positive phase of an ocean cycle called the «Indian Ocean Dipole» — when sea surface
temperatures are warmer
than average in the western Indian Ocean, likely in response to global warming.15, 16
It only examines 2000 - 2010 and global
average temperature dropped 0.4 C
since 2010 so the anthropogenic forcing inclusions are even more f*cked up
than anyone has published.
(1) According to the summary, there is a greater
than 90 percent likelihood that increased concentrations of man - made heat - trapping gases caused most of the observed increase in global
average temperatures since 1950.
So if
temperature data
since 1997 is on
average significantly higher (to give wriggle room)
than +0.26 C then the claim there's been no warming
since 1997 can not be true.
Uncertainties of estimated trends in global - and regional -
average sea - surface
temperature due to bias adjustments
since the Second World War are found to be larger
than uncertainties arising from the choice of analysis technique, indicating that this is an important source of uncertainty in analyses of historical sea - surface
temperatures.
The test demands far more
than a continuation of warming
since 1997, it demands
average temperatures since 1997 to be on
average 0.1 C higher still.
Nor is the fact that there has been no warming
since the ENSO (but the
average temperature is a little higher
than before).
Most of the observed increase in global
average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely [greater
than 90 % likelihood] due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.
However, they acknowledge that
average temperatures across the UK have increased by more
than 1 °C over the last 100 years, with a particularly steep rise
since the early 1960s.
«It is thus extremely likely (> 95 % probability) that the greenhouse gas induced warming
since the mid-twentieth century was larger
than the observed rise in global
average temperatures, and extremely likely that anthropogenic forcings were by far the dominant cause of warming.
Or maybe, «As shown in Figures 1.4 and 1.5,
since the end of the 1992 Pinatubo volcano, models have predicted a steady upward trend in global
average temperatures, but the observed series have been comparatively trendless, and thus the range of model warming predictions
since the early 1990s can be seen to have been biased towards more warming
than was subsequently observed.»
Because the 2012 summer
temperature was warmer
than previous years (as I tweeted 5 August: June 2012, warmest on record for Greenland's capital Nuuk
since at least 1866 when continuous record keeping began, +7.2 C vs +4.3 C
average), warmer
than 1929 by at least 0.5 deg.
Since 2001, the
average air
temperature at Earth's surface has risen more slowly
than it did in previous decades.
The only ocean area with record cold
temperatures was east of the Drake Passage near the Antarctic Peninsula, an area that has been much cooler
than average since late 2013.
Moreover,
since 1960, solar activity has declined slightly, while the
average global surface
temperature has increased by more
than 0.5 °C.
Temperatures have been warming on the West Antarctic Peninsula at about 0.5 ° Celsius per decade
since the early 1950s, a rate about four times faster
than the global
average.
For example,
since showing lights at night was generally not a good idea because of the submarine threat, maybe the measurements were biased more to daytime measurements, where the surface was generally warmer due to solar heating,
than to
average temperatures over the whole day which would be more typical of peacetime.
All of them sit across the Himalayas from Kathmandu (they're only the worlds tallest mountain range after all) presumably in the mountains or on the Tibetan Plateau,
since average temperatures are all 10 degrees C or more lower
than Kathmandu.
Since the
average lapse rate is -7 K per km, and the typically radiative surface in the atmosphere is at about 5 km, the surface
temperature will be 5 x 7 = 35 K warmer
than it would be in the absence of GHGs.
These events are also more tangible to the general public
than abstract statements of global
average temperature since it affects their everyday lives.