Sentences with phrase «than the board game»

Scrabble Tournaments What could be more fun than a board game tournament that's educational as well as exciting?

In real life (rather than a board game), bankruptcy can be a godsend if you're really in over your head, because it allows you to start fresh.

I think it'll be pretty fun, and I like that there's more even going on than the board game.

Not exact matches

Dating back more than 3,000 years, Go is a two - player board game that appears to be relatively simple on the surface — each player takes it in turns to lay a stone, with the objective being to surround the other player's pieces.

A specially designed software from Google's DeepMind project called «AlphaGo» beat a human player at a board game far more complicated and reliant of human intuition than chess.

If more supporters took this approach rather than boycotting games and protesting inside / outside the ground then the board would soon get the message when sponsors, retailers, concessionaires etc see a lack of income.

ZILLER: I think we need to see what exactly Neil Olshey does to clarify the roster before I'm on board with Portland to be better than what they've been, which is a team winning 45 or so games.

I took a quick peek at the Boston Celtics page, other than their game stories they're not getting any more comments than those board gets.

Board Game Equivalent: Not a board game, but you remember in P.E. in elementary school, when about 100 kids held onto the parachute and had to work together to get it to do something, and the result was still entirely mediocre and less than fulfilBoard Game Equivalent: Not a board game, but you remember in P.E. in elementary school, when about 100 kids held onto the parachute and had to work together to get it to do something, and the result was still entirely mediocre and less than fulfillGame Equivalent: Not a board game, but you remember in P.E. in elementary school, when about 100 kids held onto the parachute and had to work together to get it to do something, and the result was still entirely mediocre and less than fulfilboard game, but you remember in P.E. in elementary school, when about 100 kids held onto the parachute and had to work together to get it to do something, and the result was still entirely mediocre and less than fulfillgame, but you remember in P.E. in elementary school, when about 100 kids held onto the parachute and had to work together to get it to do something, and the result was still entirely mediocre and less than fulfilling?

Jefferson more than doubled his previous career highs inscoring and rebounding, and his 11.0 boards per game ranked seventh in theleague.

Hell, it wasn't until more than halfway through the fourth quarter that Luck and the offense woke up and got the Colts on the board again with a 35 - yard bomb to rookie first - round pick Phillip Dorsett, damn near the first time the pair has looked in sync in the first three games.

The game's board are more stingy than the real one!

The problem with AFC aside from the gutless money grabbing glory shy board, owners and manager is fans like the writer of this inane ridiculous article; fans who more than satisfied with mediocrity and take delight in trotting out silly stats to back up their lack of ambition and will... 2 loses in 15 games the writer said but conveniently forgetting to mention what impact the 2 loses had on the table, moral and the significance of winning these 2 matches.....

Until we change our game style, formation, players that are not good enough, spending policy so that we buy in all the positions we need, not just one, buy players with characters, driven by success with lots of titles behind them, change our ambition to titles, not fourth, reduce immense ticket prices, stop being a business rather than a football club, introduce younger members to the board or unbelievably somehow change the manager, I will not be convinced.

He could give a tuppence f@ck about the success of am «English soccer team» So with this in mind you have to remember that success on the pitch is absolutely the last thing that the board is after, Sanchez WILL be sold because A) he want far more money than the board are willing to pay him and B) he knows that the club are NOT seeking to up Thier game or compete on a higher level.

I think we are undervaluing Holtby because of the bad year and most on this board tend to value goaltending less than the average decision - maker in the game.

This is normally seen as a disadvantage as the theory is that points on the board are better than games in hand, but with Arsenal I am not so sure.

His record against the top teams is a joke the away form this season is relegation form and now we have fans abandoning games because they've become bored and disillusioned by it all but that won't bother Wenger he'll be around next season and probably year after that our board don't have the bottle to tell him his time is up they don't wan na upset him so they'll feed fans with the same rubbish they've been doing for years we believe next season we'll challenge for the title we have a world class manager who's hungrier than ever blah blah blah

Give up a couple of offensive boards in last couple of minutes, Teague with a crucial TO, and Denver wins by 4 after a offensive board tip - in with less than five seconds in the game.

Keep in mind the things the committee does that a poll might not do: specifically value games against other ranked teams, value games against bowl - eligible teams, and reshuffle the entire board every week, rather than just sliding teams up and down.

'' If Arsenal fans were invited to submit their opinions by email; if shareholders» and supporters» groups were still able to submit questions to the board and actually get answers; if there were any way of expressing dissatisfaction other than at away games by means of a banner — then you'd be absolutely right: sabotaging the atmosphere would be a bad thing.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

When this current season campaign is over i thing we have less than five games left will be a gentleman thing to appreciate all he has done for the club and shake his hand and wish him good luck somewhere — we cant leave on past glory «like i build the stadium» which is not true contractor / archicture and Arsenal board and loan from banks did it not him

Wenger is as usual treating players poorly and inconsistent e.g Lacca never plays 90 mins Xhaka plays every game every minute I know who I think is better For me I can not think of another midfielder who we bought worse than Xhaka We have not fixed the problems we have (as always) hoodwinked) the fans We have not spent a penny in the last two windows we've spent what been generated I have not and then I'll not spend a penny on the club till that awful manager is gone (don't give me history lessons about how good he is / was) It may be the board but until wenger has gone we won't know.

At the time of publication, the Nebraska / Penn State game has received almost 40 % more action (in terms of total number of bets) than any other game on Saturday's board, including the matchup between Oregon and Stanford, who are currently ranked seventh and fourth in the BCS Standings, respectively.

The game is being bet more than any other NCAAF Week 1 game on the board, and it's not very close:

There is still a lot of anger among some Arsenal fans, even though the planned protest against Arsene Wenger and the Arsenal board at the home game against Norwich City last weekend seemed to show more support for the beleaguered boss than a united determination to see him replaced as manager.

That result maintains Crooks» three point lead at the top of the table after two games, and Redknapp will want to get his first win on the board sooner rather than later.

More than the defensive pressure, Seton Hall's strength on the boards poses a bigger problem as the game wears on.

With those around them playing cup games, Liverpool have now played more than all their direct rivals, but do enjoy having 55 points on the board, placing them in fourth as it stands.

With a library that boasts more than 1,000 board games, a trip to Tabletop Board Game Cafe has everything you need to unplug for hours upon hours of old - schoolboard games, a trip to Tabletop Board Game Cafe has everything you need to unplug for hours upon hours of old - schoolBoard Game Cafe has everything you need to unplug for hours upon hours of old - school fun.

Thrifted board games can make a cheap at - home date night for new parents for less than $ 5 plus the cost of dessert.

The more than 2,500 - year - old board game, in which two players use black and white stones to try to capture more territory than their opponent, is extremely complex, which has made it difficult for computers to master.

Rather than just bundling a guy into the car and driving off into the board game painted sunset, I want to take my time and make sure I pick the right one.

Somewhere between online role play and the Mystery Date board game, your girls will enjoy these games in which sometimes getting ready for the date is more important than the date itself.

The fields of personal representation are actually a bit more novel than most dating sites, asking things like where you're most likely to be found, the most played song on your iPod, and your favorite board game.

More a board game than a true videogame, it can still turn at - home evenings with friends and amiibos in a lot of fun.

But you could probably do better than spending 89 minutes with this Michael Bay - produced haunted house tale / board game adaptation from first - time director Stiles White, featuring a mostly no - name cast.

To tell the truth, there isn't really anything else too exciting in the first Mario Party game, so I would avoid adding much more than simply boards or mini-games because this game in particular is too general with respect to the overall idea of Mario Party.

The fact that the price point is a bit lower than normal does make it more tolerable, but you can't help but feel EA just wants a quick turn rather than go full board with a complete game.

A few scenes — which are more comical than passionate — take place in a motel room where a man and woman are having an affair: in two scenes they kiss passionately (in one scene she's wearing a leotard and he's shirtless), in another a man puts his head on a woman's lap (it's not implied that oral sex happens) and in another we see a woman wearing a leotard and holding a board game between her knees while a man unzips his pants (we briefly see the front of his underwear) and spins a game piece with his tongue.

But these are much different because these occur more than once in a board and are multiplayer, unlike the bosses in previous games.

In this game, each board starts with only one Bowser Space in the place of a random Red Space, rather than having constant locations on each board.

A lot of people enjoy playing board games, especially board games that come from consoles since they usually are arguably a lot more fun than those old - school regular real - life board games (there's nothing wrong with those).

With a packed lineup of players and a board that covers far more area than you'd expect from a wide - release early spring lark, [Game Night] is a dark romp for all the players involved.

Judging by its trailer, the upcoming Battleship has a flimsier claim to the title of that Milton Bradley board game than Real Steel does to Rock»Em Sock»Em Robots.

In its defense, it looks worse than it is and the flimsy association to a familiar board game does more harm than good.

Yes, Game Guy is pretty broken and the boards to me were less exciting than 2 or those in several later games, but the items made the game so much more fun toGame Guy is pretty broken and the boards to me were less exciting than 2 or those in several later games, but the items made the game so much more fun togame so much more fun to me.

The board game being more luck - based than older Mario Parties.

Although the game only had six boards compared to the original Mario Party's eight boards, each one was designed in such a way that made this fact nothing more than trivia.