Nevertheless, they wrote, «The asteroid - threat community has been much more successful
than the climate change community in characterizing the dominant worst - case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers, the media and the public — even though the climate change threat is more than a thousand times greater..., [therefore] quantitative comparison of climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both threats into perspective.»
Not exact matches
«We conclude that coastal
communities are facing a looming crisis due to
climate change related sea - level rise, one that will manifest itself as increased frequency of Sandy - like inundation disasters in the coming decades along the mid-Atlantic and elsewhere, from storms with less intensity and lower storm surge
than Sandy,» Sweet said.
«We need a planning process that is equal to the scale and complexity of the challenge, rather
than continuing to depend on piecemeal efforts that put wildlife species and human
communities at higher risk in the face of global pressures like
climate change and a race for resources.»
In other words, trees show no predictable response to
climate change, and respond individually rather
than as
communities of species.
Because everyone in this global
community will be affected by
climate change, it will be for our own benefit if we manage to reduce carbon dioxide emissions in such a way that global warming is limited to less
than 2 degrees Celsius», says Prof. Ulf Riebesell, marine biologist at GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel and coordinator of BIOACID.
January 27, 2017 • What started as one «unofficial resistance» Twitter account has grown to a list of more
than 80 «rogue» accounts advocating for the science
community and
climate change research.
In the movie, a technological solution to
climate change shrinks people so they can live in tiny but lavish
communities that consume far fewer resources
than human - sized ones.
Climate change needs more attention in schools and
communities as well as global efforts, action and collaboration to protect the environment better
than before.
A larger mystery
than either missing carbon or the influence of clouds / water vapor on
climate change models is why the physical and life science
community and the (in theory) science - based
climate change advocates have not taken the time to adequately consult the evidence or experts (albeit exceptions certainly do exist) on communication about environmental issues, risk, or environmental and health literacy.
Our interactions with
climate, for far more
than 99 percent of history, ran in one direction: Precipitation or temperatures
changed, ice sheets or coastlines or deserts advanced or retreated, and
communities thrived, suffered, or adjusted how or where they lived.
For more
than a decade, I've been probing
changes in Arctic
climate and sea ice and their implications for the species that make up northern ecosystems and for human
communities there.
Of course, Earth Hour 2009 is just around the corner... And Earth Hour 2009 aims to reach more
than one billion people in 1000 cities around the world, inviting
communities, business and governments to switch off lights for one hour at 8:30 pm on Saturday March 28 and sending a powerful global message that we care enough about
climate change to take action.
In a recent interview, Nordhaus - whose models project a smaller economic impact
than most - said that regardless of whether the models showing larger or smaller economic impacts from
climate change are correct, «We've got to get together as a
community of nations and impose restraints on greenhouse gas emissions and raise carbon prices.
Where other
than the blogosphere does the scientific
community treat
climate change as not man made?
And in addition, think about all the wasted energy the «
climate community» spent mitigating the impact of «deniers,» when «skeptics» could have helped out by listening more carefully to the «climate community,» and trying to understand «the climate community's» arguments, and adding to progress on increasing our understanding of the causes of climate variability and change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capi
climate community» spent mitigating the impact of «deniers,» when «skeptics» could have helped out by listening more carefully to the «
climate community,» and trying to understand «the climate community's» arguments, and adding to progress on increasing our understanding of the causes of climate variability and change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capi
climate community,» and trying to understand «the
climate community's» arguments, and adding to progress on increasing our understanding of the causes of climate variability and change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capi
climate community's» arguments, and adding to progress on increasing our understanding of the causes of
climate variability and change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capi
climate variability and
change — rather
than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at
Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capi
Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «
climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capi
climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capitalism.
Rainfall from resolved rather
than parameterized processes better represents the present ‐ day and
climate change response of moderate rates in the
community atmosphere model.
Even among those who say the Earth is warming, Republicans are less inclined
than Democrats to see
climate change affecting their local
community.
This group is also more likely
than older generations in the GOP to perceive at least some effects of
climate change in the
communities where they live.
For the broad
community of groups, experts and thinkers focused on combating
climate change, healthy debate and disagreement about strategy and tactics could be a strength, rather
than our undoing.
Climate change can affect our lives in drastic ways and has been a topic of interest to the scientific
community for longer
than you might realize.
The monster storm — which killed more
than 100 people, destroyed entire
communities, and inflicted more
than $ 70 billion in damages — should have completely
changed the way we approach
climate impacts, resilience, and global warming policy.
United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change (UNFCCC)- The Convention was adopted on 9 May 1992 in New York and signed at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro by more
than 150 countries and the European
Community.
I know so much more about
climate change and the environment
than before I attended the Summit and I walked out with a fresh set of ways to help my
communities combat
climate change.
More
than a decade of national media attention to the human impacts of
climate change in the Arctic has largely framed
communities as victims to sell the urgency of mitigation to the public.
The growing interest in GCM performance at regional scales, rather
than global, has come from at least two different directions: the
climate modelling
community and the
climate change adaptation
community.
For the
climate change adaptation
community, whose spatial scale of interest is often much lower
than current high resolution GCMs can capture, the answer in general is no.
«The current state is driven by human impacts to habitat, and these impacts have been a stronger force in shaping the mammal
community over the last century
than just
climate change.»
I see no difference between what is happening in the
climate change debate courtesy of nutters like Lew and Oreskes and what is happening in the wider
community, where the unwitting use of politically incorrect words and phrases is increasingly becoming the subject of ludicrous and lengthy official investigations which amount to little more
than officially sanctioned witch hunts.
But Funafuti Island Chief Silliga Kofe said that his people do not want to relocate, and that the international
community should live up to the pre-Paris pledge of restricting
climate change to the targeted maximum of 1.5 degrees Celsius over this century (rather
than the 2 degrees Celsius goal acknowledged by the Paris negotiators as acceptable).
The rapid rate of
climate change now means that many groups, ranging from
communities to parliaments, now have to factor
climate change into their deliberations and decision making more
than ever before.
These points were recently emphasized in a set of guiding principles for including forests in
climate change issued last month by the Forests Dialogue on Climate Change, a coalition consisting of more than 250 representatives of governments, forestry companies, trade unions, environmental and social groups, international organizations, forest owners, indigenous peoples and forest - community
climate change issued last month by the Forests Dialogue on Climate Change, a coalition consisting of more than 250 representatives of governments, forestry companies, trade unions, environmental and social groups, international organizations, forest owners, indigenous peoples and forest - community g
change issued last month by the Forests Dialogue on
Climate Change, a coalition consisting of more than 250 representatives of governments, forestry companies, trade unions, environmental and social groups, international organizations, forest owners, indigenous peoples and forest - community
Climate Change, a coalition consisting of more than 250 representatives of governments, forestry companies, trade unions, environmental and social groups, international organizations, forest owners, indigenous peoples and forest - community g
Change, a coalition consisting of more
than 250 representatives of governments, forestry companies, trade unions, environmental and social groups, international organizations, forest owners, indigenous peoples and forest -
community groups.
Because global emissions continue to rise rather
than decrease after 20 years since
climate change negotiations began, the international
community has lost several decades in finding a way to prevent dangerous
climate change.
These newly released datasets, in addition to the more
than 500 others already available, will better inform scientists and
communities about how to minimize the health impacts of
climate change.
Although there are many countries other
than the United States that have frequently failed to respond to what justice would require of them to reduce the threat of
climate change, the United States, perhaps more
than any other country, has gained a reputation in the international
community for its consistent unwillingness to commit to serious greenhouse gas emissions reductions during the over two decades that world has been seeking a global agreement on how to respond to
climate change.
«The Earth's
climate system is highly nonlinear: inputs and outputs are not proportional,
change is often episodic and abrupt, rather
than slow and gradual,... It is imperative that the Earth's
climate system research
community embraces this nonlinear paradigm if we are to move forward in the assessment of the human influence on
climate..»
«The Earth's
climate system is highly nonlinear: inputs and outputs are not proportional,
change is often episodic and abrupt, rather
than slow and gradual, and multiple equilibria are the norm... there is a relatively poor understanding of the different types of nonlinearities, how they manifest under various conditions, and whether they reflect a
climate system driven by astronomical forcings, by internal feedbacks, or by a combination of both... [We] suggest a robust alternative to prediction that is based on using integrated assessments within the framework of vulnerability studies... It is imperative that the Earth's
climate system research
community embraces this nonlinear paradigm if we are to move forward in the assessment of the human influence on
climate.»
In fact many scientists believe that the warming limit should be lower
than 2 degree C to prevent dangerous
climate change and as a result the international
community has also agreed to study whether the warming limit should be lowered to 1.5 degree C.
Whether such adaptability is sufficient to address the challenges of
climate change depends both on the speed of
climate - induced
changes and on the degree to which Native
communities are supported rather
than constrained in the adaptive measures they need to make.147
The world's scientific
community came together last week to issue an updated assessment of
climate science and reported that the evidence is clearer
than ever that human influence is driving
climate change.
Can anyone explain to me why it's more likely that the underfunded, rather impoverished
climate change community apparently has superior resources and access to revenue
than does the entire of the automotive / fossil fuel industry?
That some still talk about «belief» — a matter of faith more so
than facts — in findings that have long been accepted by the scientific
community speaks volumes about the general public's understanding and acceptance of global
climate change.
More
than 600 people met at the International Conference on
Climate Change to contend that «global warming is not a crisis, that the question of what causes it and how extensive it's going to be are wide open in the scientific
community,» claimed Joseph Bast, president of the institute.
With time running short, and abrupt rather
than gradual
climate change looming as a distinct possibility, the design
community must be quickly engaged.
The facts that a) we use in one year an amount of fossil fuel that took a million years to accumulate, b) we may be on the verge of a
climate change catastrophe of global proportions and c) powerful technologies may soon fall into the hands of disturbed individuals with minds riven with those twin cancers of nationalism and religious fanaticism, seem to concern the scientific
community a lot more
than they do politicians or the media.
And meanwhile, Lynas can demand that
climate change must take precedence over all of the other problems out there that are «worse for the poor» (which he does)-- indeed, that are worse for the poor
than climate change, according to no less
than the WHO itself — and still be a respected member of the political
climate change community.
Governments and the international
community have to save lives now, but also act to reduce that chronic vulnerability, building local abilities to manage the drought cycle, improving the flow of data, information and ideas for adapting to
climate change and drastically increasing long - term investment in smallholder agriculture and pastoralism, which have shown they can provide a decent life for millions of East Africans, provided they are supported (rather
than ignored) by governments.
For many of the groups working for the equal involvement of women in
climate change issues, the deliberations on
climate change are too narrowly focused on the politics of emissions reductions, rather
than the long - term social and
community initiatives that could underpin a real shift in a global consciousness or more effective practices of post-disaster rebuilding.In a statement to the U.N. General Assembly in July of this year, executive director of the Women's Environment and Development Organization (WEDO), June Zeitlin, points out: «Women have always been leaders in
community revitalization and natural resource management.
It's pretty much conventional wisdom in the green
community that the cost of preventing
climate change now will be less
than the cost of doing nothing and trying to adapt later, even if it costs 1 - 2 % of global GDP.
The report, which is the product of more
than 300 lead authors and hundreds more contributing authors, focuses on
climate change impacts as well as opportunities to adapt to a
changing climate and reduce the global
community's vulnerability to
climate change - related impacts.
A study of coverage of the recent United Nations» Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) report finds that many mainstream media outlets amplified the marginal viewpoints of those who doubt the role of human activity in warming the planet, even though the report itself reflects that the climate science community is more certain than ever that humans are the major driver of climate
Climate Change (IPCC) report finds that many mainstream media outlets amplified the marginal viewpoints of those who doubt the role of human activity in warming the planet, even though the report itself reflects that the climate science community is more certain than ever that humans are the major driver of climate c
Change (IPCC) report finds that many mainstream media outlets amplified the marginal viewpoints of those who doubt the role of human activity in warming the planet, even though the report itself reflects that the
climate science community is more certain than ever that humans are the major driver of climate
climate science
community is more certain
than ever that humans are the major driver of
climate climate changechange.