Sentences with phrase «than the dividends paid»

If you were to own 100 shares of the company than your dividend pay - out comes to $ 78.

Free Cash Flow / Share higher than dividends paid 3.

Not exact matches

Fill the bulk of your portfolio with a combination of high - rated bonds (weighted toward corporate, rather than government, debt) and high - quality, dividend - paying equities, and you likely won't take a hit.

But purchasing stable, dividend - yielding equities will go a longer way than owning low - paying fixed - income assets.

Profits paid out from the corporation to shareholders as dividends are taxed at a significantly lower rate than personal income and income can be split with family members to further offset taxes.

It also pays a 1.98 % dividend, which is much lower than its big bank peers.

Apple is now paying out more cash in the form of dividends to its shareholders than any other major publicly traded company in the U.S.

The crux of the problem, Richard Mattoon, a senior economist at the Chicago Fed and a lecturer on real estate at Northwestern University told Canadian Business, is that dividends and capital gains make up a much larger share of top earners» pay than they did in the past — and that part of their compensation package tends to be very volatile.

It also means that over the next year, Apple will be paying more back in dividends than any other publicly traded company, beating out oil giant Exxon Mobil for the position, according to Howard Siliverblatt, veteran market watcher and senior index analyst at S&P Dow Jones Indices.

The restriction caused 23andMe to focus more on international markets than it otherwise would have, which has paid dividends.

You can think of the «return» on this investment as the value of paying yourself, rather than a landlord, even if it's not paying dividends or increasing in value.

They usually pay good dividends, usually trade for less than their cash or assets in the bank, and are fairly stable (it's very hard for a municipality to not pay back its debts for various reasons, some of them constitutional).

While some banks, such as Wells Fargo, are paying more per share than they were before the recession, others, like Citigroup, haven't increased dividends at all.

Buying back stock is, for example, Warren Buffett's preferred way of returning cash to shareholders (rather than paying a dividend).

These corporate fixed - income instruments pay a dividend that is taxed at a more favourable rate than regular bond interest, but you only benefit from this if they are held outside of a registered account.

It also pays a dividend yielding more than 1 %.

The stocks that hedge funds have largely ignored tend to be much larger than the hotels, have less debt, grow earnings more slowly but consistently, and pay bigger dividends (an average yield of nearly 3 % for the S&P 500 constituents, compared with 2 % for the index overall).

Making the decision today to focus on creating a warm and respectful culture throughout your company, rather than to narrowly focus on profit, will undoubtedly pay plenty of dividends in the long run.

April 23 (Reuters)- Barrick Gold Corp reported a slightly better than expected increase in first - quarter adjusted profit on Monday and said it was done selling assets to cut debt and would instead use funds from any future sales to boost growth or pay dividends.

«If you are just buying income and not paying attention to the valuations, you are probably taking on more risk than you bargained for,» says Brad Kinkelaar, head of the dividend team at Pimco.

These risks and uncertainties include: Gilead's ability to achieve its anticipated full year 2018 financial results; Gilead's ability to sustain growth in revenues for its antiviral and other programs; the risk that private and public payers may be reluctant to provide, or continue to provide, coverage or reimbursement for new products, including Vosevi, Yescarta, Epclusa, Harvoni, Genvoya, Odefsey, Descovy, Biktarvy and Vemlidy ®; austerity measures in European countries that may increase the amount of discount required on Gilead's products; an increase in discounts, chargebacks and rebates due to ongoing contracts and future negotiations with commercial and government payers; a larger than anticipated shift in payer mix to more highly discounted payer segments and geographic regions and decreases in treatment duration; availability of funding for state AIDS Drug Assistance Programs (ADAPs); continued fluctuations in ADAP purchases driven by federal and state grant cycles which may not mirror patient demand and may cause fluctuations in Gilead's earnings; market share and price erosion caused by the introduction of generic versions of Viread and Truvada, an uncertain global macroeconomic environment; and potential amendments to the Affordable Care Act or other government action that could have the effect of lowering prices or reducing the number of insured patients; the possibility of unfavorable results from clinical trials involving investigational compounds; Gilead's ability to initiate clinical trials in its currently anticipated timeframes; the levels of inventory held by wholesalers and retailers which may cause fluctuations in Gilead's earnings; Kite's ability to develop and commercialize cell therapies utilizing the zinc finger nuclease technology platform and realize the benefits of the Sangamo partnership; Gilead's ability to submit new drug applications for new product candidates in the timelines currently anticipated; Gilead's ability to receive regulatory approvals in a timely manner or at all, for new and current products, including Biktarvy; Gilead's ability to successfully commercialize its products, including Biktarvy; the risk that physicians and patients may not see advantages of these products over other therapies and may therefore be reluctant to prescribe the products; Gilead's ability to successfully develop its hematology / oncology and inflammation / respiratory programs; safety and efficacy data from clinical studies may not warrant further development of Gilead's product candidates, including GS - 9620 and Yescarta in combination with Pfizer's utomilumab; Gilead's ability to pay dividends or complete its share repurchase program due to changes in its stock price, corporate or other market conditions; fluctuations in the foreign exchange rate of the U.S. dollar that may cause an unfavorable foreign currency exchange impact on Gilead's future revenues and pre-tax earnings; and other risks identified from time to time in Gilead's reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).

In general, companies from emerging markets invest more, and more often, than their counterparts in the developed world: between 1999 and 2008, emerging - market companies paid out half as much in dividends, but invested much more in fixed assets.

Hotel REITs pay out just 73 % of their available cash flow, so these firms have greater potential for dividend growth than other sectors.

Therefore, if the insurer makes more money than is needed to run the business, they pay some of it back to policyowners in the form of a dividend.

I absolutely do not believe that mutual funds are a better investment than individual stocks (companies that pay rising dividends over time) over the long run, so I invest the rest of my savings in a taxable account (as well as maxing out my Roth IRA every year, of which individual stocks are purchased).

If pre-product, pre-revenue companies (i.e. loss making, just idea stage) can be valued for $ 10 — $ 20 million, why can't Financial Samurai, which is highly profitable, has six years of existence, can pay a nice dividend if it wants to, has way less risk than all these new startups, and can grow revenue by triple digits every year with promotion, be worth a similar range?

HXT is much smaller and not as liquid as XIU but has a couple of advantages: its annual MER, at 0.07 % ($ 7 per $ 10k), is less than half of XIU's; to defer taxes, rather than paying out, it reinvests its dividend.

While it is tax free, I'd much rather buy a 4 % dividend yield over 30 diversified companies that should grow the dividend and appreciate over time than rely on California, Illinois, etc to pay their bills, especially in the next recession.

Rather than an oil ETF, with our longer view, we prefer ETFs that invests in oil producers who naturally have exposure to WTI, Brent and other petro sources and pay dividends.

He has stakes in more than a half dozen other public companies, many of which pay dividends.

It is usual that dividends are paid by more mature companies, rather than less mature, higher growth companies.

Pass - throughs will counter that in many cases, people who own stock through 401 (k) s and IRAs don't have to pay capital gains or dividend taxes, and so their profits are only taxed at the corporate rate, which is lower than the top individual rate (and would be much lower under this plan), putting pass - throughs at a potential disadvantage.

This means it has many smaller companies that pay higher dividends than the RBCs and Manulifes of the market.

The Consumer Staples, Utilities, and Telecommunications sectors have historically paid out higher dividends than other sectors.

These are defined as stocks that historically paid a persistently higher - than - average dividend (as a percentage of their share price) over time.

This is one reason why the S&P 500 trades at a price / book value ratio of nearly 6, compared to a historical norm below 2.0: companies have created virtually no underlying shareholder value by retaining earnings rather than paying them out as dividends.

Plan B calls for giving this money directly to the banks and leading insurance companies, on terms that let them continue paying high executive salaries and dividends to existing shareholders rather than wiping them out as normally happens when an enterprise has Negative Equity.

They pay better dividends than the Index and every other sector barring telecoms.

These funds invest in stocks that pay dividends in line with or higher than the broader market.

After all... How much risk is there if you could take a company private for way less than the amount of cash it has in the bank, cease operations and pay out the cash as a dividend?

This marks 282 consecutive quarters — dating back to 1948 — that Southern Company will have paid a dividend to its shareholders that is equal to or greater than the previous quarter.

So, you may be receiving dividends, but you're paying a lot more money out than those dividends are worth.

If you receive dividends or surrender your coverage, there are no income taxes unless the amount of money you receive is greater than the amount you've paid in premiums.

You may not have added to your positions but you stayed on course which is more than most people have done and if you held quality dividend stocks you were still getting paid during that rocky period.

Why would they stop paying dividends now or next year after more than three decades of regular dividend payments?

As its name suggests, the blog is focused largely on dividend paying stocks rather than value or growth stocks, which makes it better suited for conservative income investors.

I'm curious though, are there any historical examples or potential reasons you can think of that a growth company might choose to pay dividends rather than investing in R&D or something else?

In addition, dividend stocks often cause a stock to fall far less than non-dividend paying equities because they become «yield supported».

If a company pays a dividend equivalent to a 3 % yield, management is essentially telling investors they can't find better investments within the company that will return greater than 3 %.

RESOLVED: Whereas the corporation has more money than it needs and since the owners unlike Warren are not multi billionaires, the board shall consider paying a meaningful annual dividend on the shares.