Sentences with phrase «than the employer provides»

I use Fidelity Brokerage Link through my financial advisor, which provides me with many more funds than my employer provides.

A 2015 study by the Life Insurance and Market Research Association (LIMRA) found that 65 % of employees with employer sponsored group life insurance believe they need more insurance than the employer - sponsored group life insurance believe that they need more insurance than the employer provides.

Not exact matches

But the incident has thrown holes in the Family and Medical Leave Act into the spotlight; her employer has less than 50 employees, and therefore is not required to provide the 12 weeks of unpaid leave the act requires.

Because these bare - bones plans do not limit insurance payouts to workers, they meet the letter of the law's requirements that employers provide «affordable» health care coverage to their workers at a far lower cost than more comprehensive plans.

In addition, more than 76 percent of engaged employees surveyed by Quantum Workplace this year said they were satisfied with the health and wellbeing benefits their employer provided, compared with less than 49 percent of hostile employees.

Among employees surveyed by Prudential, 60 percent said employer - provided voluntary benefits typically cost less than those purchased elsewhere.

Wait for the employer to give a range, and when it does ask you for a figure you expect to be making, choose a salary that is higher than the median they provide.

Employer - based insurance still provides the bedrock in Romney's vision, and anybody who has a choice between employer insurance or private insurance would be wise to choose the former — we've discussed elsewhere how the negotiating strength of large employers offers a lot more protection than being on yEmployer - based insurance still provides the bedrock in Romney's vision, and anybody who has a choice between employer insurance or private insurance would be wise to choose the former — we've discussed elsewhere how the negotiating strength of large employers offers a lot more protection than being on yemployer insurance or private insurance would be wise to choose the former — we've discussed elsewhere how the negotiating strength of large employers offers a lot more protection than being on your own.

With the GOP crusade to repeal and replace «Obamacare» failing, the federal mandates that people have insurance and that employers with more than 50 workers provide it seem likely to stay in place in the foreseeable future.

When it comes to family leave, he also sees a trend in which employers do more than just provide paid time off.

Many millennials have expectations of an employer that differ from the expectations of earlier generations — and some of those things they want may be easier for you to provide than you might think.

Large employers, which help provide the vast majority of Americans» private health insurance, paid for more than $ 2.6 billion worth of opioid addiction and overdose treatment services in 2016, KFF finds.

A large body of law and custom in the United States holds that because employers have far more power over their employees than businesses do over their customers, they must provide them with far greater protections — not least, a minimum wage and overtime pay.

Now more than ever, self - funded employers are seeking financial value from the health benefits plan they provide while still maintaining quality of care.

More than 46 million workers are currently covered by employer - provided retirement plans in the United States, according to the U.S Department of Labor.1 For most of them, these plans are a significant portion of their total assets.

It can be a win - win situation for both — providing the employer with a low - cost benefit to attract and retain desirable employees and enabling the employee to procure more insurance than he or she otherwise could afford (thereby providing more security for the employee and his or her family).

By 2016, a lot fewer people will have employer - provided health insurance than in 2010.

If I were an employer, I believe the morning after pill would end up being more cost efficient than providing maternity costs and another dependant.

Black Protestants are far more likely to say employers should be required to provide contraception coverage (70 %) than not (23 %).

The blessings she counts include employer - provided health insurance for her children, which makes her better off than 41 million Americans who don't have health insurance.

More than two weeks ago, the Department of Health and Human Service issued a mandate instructing all employers that provide health insurance to their employees include the option for paid birth control, the morning after pill and intrauterine devices.

It should also involve a refundable (meaning it might be larger than your tax liability) tax credit toward insurance for catastrophic healthcare expenses for those without employer - provided plans.

It isn't just the poor and / or homeless harmed in this ObamaCare nightmare, it is anyone earning more than $ 47,000 who is self - employed or does not have employer provided insurance.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

CNN discovered on page 1239 of law that employers with more than 50 employees are required to provide «a place, other than a bathroom, that is shielded from view and free from intrusion from co-workers and the public, which may be used by an employee to express breast milk.»

The U.S. Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), signed into law in 2010, requires employers to provide moms of babies younger than 12 months a reasonable break time for pumping and a private place to pump, other than a bathroom.

The union wants federal employers to provide more than the required 30 days advance notice to furloughed employees.

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requires employers to provide most «non-exempt» employees with a «reasonable break time» and a private space, other than a bathroom, for the expression of breastmilk, through the child's first birthday.

The Affordable Care Act requires employers with more than 50 employees to provide a clean, private area (that isn't a bathroom) for breastfeeding moms to pump.

The employer shall make reasonable efforts to provide the employee with the use of a room or other location, other than a toilet stall, in close proximity to the employee's work area, for the employee to express milk in private.

Research conducted by BCCWF in 2014 looked at more than 1,000 fathers from 286 different organizations in the U.S. and found that paternity leave is important to them: a full 89 % of dads surveyed believed it is important that an employer provide paid paternity leave.

Women who go back to work right after giving birth might not have the time to establish breastfeeding — and even if they do, they might have trouble finding a place to pump, as only employers with more than 50 workers are required to provide employees with a clean lactation room.

Employers are also required to make a reasonable effort to provide a private location, other than a toilet stall, in close proximity to the workplace for this activity.

§ 11-5-116 (2009) requires an employer to provide reasonable unpaid break time each day to an employee who needs to express breast milk for her child and requires an employer to make a reasonable effort to provide a private, secure and sanitary room or other location other than a toilet stall where an employee can express her breast milk.

According to the new healthcare law, employers are required to provide «a place, other than a bathroom, that is shielded from view and free from intrusion from coworkers and the public, which may be used by an employee to express breast milk.»

Employers are also required to make a reasonable effort to provide a private location, other than a bathroom or toilet stall, in close proximity to the workplace that is shielded from view, free from intrusion and has an electrical outlet.

Now the cravat (and where many businesses fall through the loophole) is that if a business has less than 50 employees they are not required to provide pumping time or space if it would cause «undue hardship» to the employer.

Employers are also required to make a reasonable effort to provide a private location, other than a toilet stall, in close proximity to the work place for this activity.

The law also requires employers to make reasonable efforts to provide a room or other location, other than a toilet stall, where an employee can express her milk in privacy.

The employer must also provide a place, other than a bathroom, for the employee to express breast milk.

249 requires specified employers to provide reasonable break time for an employee to express milk for a nursing child in a location, other than a bathroom, that is sanitary, shielded from view and free from intrusion.

The employer must make reasonable efforts to provide a clean place, other than a bathroom, where an employee may express breast milk in privacy.

Finally, «the employer must make a reasonable effort to provide the mother with a private space close to her work area, other than a bathroom, to express breast milk.»

Requires that an employer make reasonable efforts to provide a sanitary room or other location, other than a bathroom or toilet stall, where an employee can express her breast milk in privacy and security.

The law also provides that employers with more than 25 employees must provide a private location, other than a toilet stall, where an employee can express the employee's breast milk in private and if possible to provide a refrigerator for storing breast milk that has been expressed.

Your employer doesn't have to compensate you for the break, but they must provide a place other than the bathroom for you to pump according to the Affordable Care Act.

Employers also must make an effort to provide a private location, other than a toilet stall, where a woman may express milk.

Since formula is so easy and available that even WIC provides it * there is no reason for employers to provide time / space for pumping and daycares can get away with charging more for handling breastmilk (even though it's less work than preparing a bottle of formula).

Moreover, «employers should consider providing more generous leaves than the 12 weeks of unpaid leave granted by the FMLA through expanding the duration of leave given or providing paid leave or both,» urged Dr. Dagher.

«The Business Council applauds Governor Andrew M. Cuomo's tax relief proposal that will provide more than $ 2 billion in savings to New York employers and residents.