Not exact matches
Rather
than staying becalmed in the sacristy, the sanctuary, and the presbytery, the clergy of his day, he urged, should lead a demanding,
Gospel - centered life of
proclaiming the Word and celebrating the sacraments, nourishing their people with the tangible realities God had entrusted to human hands as pathways to the Trinity: the Bible and the Eucharist.
And above all, we should be on our guard against preaching a
gospel in which the God who is
proclaimed as active in Christ is other
than the God who is the Lord of all creation.
Can you think of ways to
proclaim the
Gospel using something other
than just words?
In such a situation the Church may finally have no other choice
than to remain faithful to the
gospel and to
proclaim the hard message of the holy God, leaving everything else to the grace of him who can certainly also save men in a situation in which the Church can do no more.
A disembodied Word expressed in creedal statements, which were constructed to defend orthodoxy against heresy rather
than proclaim the faith, will not communicate the joy and redemptive power of the
gospel.
Nor is that parallel nothing more
than an interesting accident; I believe that it is a parallel so profound and so revealing that it gives us insight into the nature of the Eucharist as the chief piece of Christian worship while it also provides us with the clue as to how the
gospel which is
proclaimed can become the life - giving reality of the Christian tradition down the ages to the present day.
If, instead of
gospel, what is
proclaimed in the churches is nothing more
than the kinds of «musts» and «shoulds» and «ought to's» that one can hear from many other quarters — along with the ubiquitous language of «rights» — then we can not expect church people to be any more receptive to such exhortations
than are their counter parts in society at large.
They expound and defend the implications of the
Gospel rather
than proclaim it.
There is so much work to be done in correcting misunderstandings, in discovering and exploring commonalities, in tempering or removing hostilities, in contending for cultural renewal, and, above all, in
proclaiming the saving
gospel of Jesus Christ with one another rather
than against one another.
An apostle who
proclaimed the
gospel among Jews might have believed that Jewish Christianity, though ultimately only a part of Catholic Christianity, deserved more adequate representation
than it found in Mark.
Most Likely to Totally Nail It in Less
Than 600 Words: Mason Slater at Deeper Story with «Gender and the
Gospel» «So then part of faithfully
proclaiming that
Gospel is
proclaiming to the people of God that gender, social class, and ethnicity do not define who God can use and how he can use them... So yes, I think the neo-Reformed movement is right, gender roles have everything to do with the
Gospel.
Some have said that Paul's
gospel was different
than the
gospel that John the Baptist preached, which was different again from the
gospel that Jesus
proclaimed.
The Lord, who is
proclaimed in the
gospel as God's definitive and focal activity in manhood for our wholeness, takes us into himself, makes us one with himself, lives in us as we live in him, to the end that we may be knit together in «a bundle of life» in a much deeper sense
than the Old Testament writer of that wonderful phrase could ever understand.