Sentences with phrase «than the market price why»

Assuming the set price isn't higher than the market price why wouldn't you put it on the MLS and see how high of a price you can get?

Not exact matches

Instead, choose to acknowledge the uncomfortable reality that your product comes with a premium price, and use that as an opportunity to explain why it's significantly better than other options on the market.

Then, in this technical trading commentary published one day later, we stressed why the most profitable swing traders are those who learn to merely react to the market's price action that is presented to them at any give time, rather than those who attempt to predict the direction of the next move.

This is why, in strongly uptrending markets, we find it much easier and more profitable to focus on the price action and technical patterns of individual leadership stocks and ETFs, rather than paying much attention to whether or not the charts of the S&P, Nasdaq, and Dow are «overbought» (we hate that useless term).

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

With gas prices staying cheap and a string of ever - more - enticing crossover SUVs hitting the market, you can understand why many families are choosing to go with something bigger and taller than the plain «ol four - door of the past.

But in the end, when we realize the market (readers) has likely already spoken, and that is why Amazon is setting the price at $ 9.99 or lower (because it understands the digital market better than any company I've seen thus far)... we can realize this «fight for prices» has already been «won.»

Since assets get marked to market and those show appreciation for their public holding (but not private ones like See's or Furniture Mart), I now understand why Buffett claims their intrinsic value is probably far higher than BRK's stock price may indicate.

Why rising home prices are more important than the stock market for the economy.

This is why we expect a greater return on stocks than bonds, of course; that's consistent with the capital asset pricing model and the efficient market hypothesis.

Check the share price at least weekly and, if it has gone down more than what may be expected with normal market fluctuations, you'll need to investigate why.

Why: In 2015, low - volatility strategies more than lived up to expectations, particularly for Canadian equities where the tumultuous loonie and falling oil prices have added to market volatility.

I have no idea where the market is going tomorrow, and if I think it's going to go up, why not buy it at the current price than risk losing the position?

Why would the market cap for a company be lower than its shares outstanding x share price?

Those anticipated investments may help to explain why, even as power markets are roiled by the price impacts of cheap gas and renewables, utilities appear more confident than ever before about integrating intermittent generation and maintaining reliability.

To explain why rising private market valuations might be justified, we needed to explore why the market today may be different than ever before (there are a number of good articles testing out the rationality of public market valuations in technology these days — this analysis is much more directly focused on teasing out the rationality of asset prices for those companies that aren't valued and revalued on a daily basis).

While prices on South Korean exchanges are often higher than elsewhere, it still remains perplexing why an analytics website would exclude up to 20 % of the total crypto market trade volume which happens to occur in this one Southeast Asian nation.

Yet, that's not always clear to new people entering the market, and many believe that's why a handful of altcoins — including dogecoin and dentacoin, both of which recently reached market caps of more than $ 1 billion — are seeing a pump in their price, as they offer an affordable way to get into the cryptocurrency markets in whole units.

Yet, that's not always clear to new people entering the market, and many believe that's why a handful of altcoins - including dogecoin and dentacoin, both of which recently reached market caps of more than $ 1 billion - are seeing a pump in their price, as they offer an affordable way to get into the cryptocurrency markets in whole units.

That alone is a major reason why it's so much better than any iPhone before it, even though it might be exorbitantly priced in many markets, and will no doubt push Samsung to do better.

Those reasons are partly why new homes cost 37 percent more than existing homes, based on differences in median prices, and that difference is keeping the new home market from growing to take advantage of strong demand.

When a home Seller is counselled to offer a lower than average amount of selling commission to a Cooperating Brokerage, are they being advised as to how this may possibly interact negatively with a prospective Buyer's «Buyer's Agency Contract», and if so, why would such a Seller agree to proceed as such — especially, if they've been made aware of any discounts that may apply to their List Price, later, as a result of extended market time?The aforesaid is fundamental to a fiduciary responsibility — yet, I believe that most Provincial Regulatory Authorities would be reluctant to prosecute such a negligent Registrant or Practitioner because the accused would hide behind the argument they were being wrongly persecuted for offering a «competitive business model»!

That's why sold inventory is more reliable for determining the realistic price of your seller's home than the asking price of properties currently on the market.

• REO - only price performance helps shed light on why certain markets are performing better than others.