Sentences with phrase «than the plaintiff regarding»
Today, the Supreme Court decided to let lower courts decide the admissibility of testimony by employees other than the plaintiff regarding workplace discrimination, also known as «me too» evidence, in discrimination cases.
http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/ Not exact matches
Having regard to the fact that the respondent is older than Ms. Sharma, that he has no realistic possibility of obtaining similar employment and that he had a longer tenure of service than Ms. Sharma, but considerably less than the plaintiff in Di Tomaso v. Crown Metal Manufacturing Packaging Canada LP, 2010 O.J. No. 4414, we conclude that an appropriate notice period is 18 months.
Another significant and surprising finding with regard to damages to corporations is that in the 2003 - 13 data, punitive damages were awarded to corporations much more often, and in much higher amounts, than to human plaintiffs.
Instead of analyzing whether California has jurisdiction over the product liability situation, in general, the high court decides that the determination regarding whether California has jurisdiction over a suit against a particular defendant must be made on a plaintiff by plaintiff basis when «specific jurisdiction» rather than «general jurisdiction» is involved.
The new statute enacted in SB 735 does not go into depth regarding a plaintiff's burden to prove that the proposed net worth discovery methods would be «more than likely to succeed.»
The question regarding the statute of limitation involved whether the plaintiff learned of his injuries more than two years before he added BASF to the lawsuit.
Regarding the feeder driver position, the majority notes that Blood's tentative notation that Faidley was capable of performing the job was only «a preliminary subjective opinion, unsupported by objective evidence, not materially different than the employee's subjective assessment that was insufficient to create a material dispute with his physician's restrictions...,» and unable to overcome the substantial objective evidence of the plaintiff's medical restrictions.
In the present case, the position taken by the Bank regarding termination for cause was not only aggressive, it was done for no other reason than to make the Plaintiffs» case more difficult than it should have been.
Perhaps most importantly in this regard, we conclude that plaintiffs have more than met their burden of establishing a genuine issue of material fact as to Paladin's intent, even assuming that the First Amendment erects a heightened standard from that required under Maryland state law.