As any sleep - deprived new mother knows, cooking can become more of a dangerous chore
than a pleasure in the months following the birth of a child.
Not exact matches
They only think about it not working because humans,
in general, prefer to avoiddiscomfort more
than they want to seek more
pleasure.
Dissident feminist Camille Paglia finds more
pleasure in the shoe department
than a contemporary art gallery.
The main presuppositions about sentiment which behavioural finance are starting to confirm are mainly that 1) investors overemphasise the significance of fundamental data to the detriment of other equally important but more overlooked data that still can have an effect on a share's price 2) investors take losses a lot worse
than the
pleasure of making a winning trade and 3) investors continue
in the mistakes they make with regard to bad methodology and repeating mistakes based upon emotion.
As humans, we're wired
in a way that avoiding pain is much more important to our survival
than gaining
pleasure is (most of the time, anyways!).
«But know this, that
in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self - control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of
pleasure rather
than lovers of God....
Have you ever 2Timothy3: 1 - 5 It speak about
in the last day critical time hard to deal with will be here.2 men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money,self - assuming, haughty, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, disloyal, 3 having no natural affection, not open to any agreement, slanderers, without self control, fierce, without love of goodness, 4 betrayers, headstrong, puffed up with pride, lovers of
pleasures rather
than lovers of god, 5 having a form of godly devotion but proving false to its power, and from these turn away.God speak of these thing occurring
in our day.
As carnal, embodied creatures, our desire to eat meat works
in us at a more elemental level
than desires for cognitive
pleasures.
We settle for the comfort and
pleasure of the lesser goods
in life rather
than pursue the Greatest Good, which is a transformational relationship with God.
And to be real
in this life, should we really pursue the
pleasure more
than the pain?
Suppose,
in a kind of contented abstinence, we were to refrain from trying to understand more of the landscape before us
than the landscape cared to display for us, that we were willing to follow the bend of bough and straggle of gravel and tilt of pole wherever the bend and the straggle and the tilt chanced to take us, that we concerned ourselves not with pattern or profit or even
pleasure but merely with watching like a token sentinel
in safe country, that we gave our eyes a quiet carte blanche and permitted our minds to play at liberty over the face of an untouched terrain?
Thus the God takes
pleasure in arraying the lily
in a garb more glorious
than that of Solomon; but if there could be any thought of an understanding here, would it not be a sorry delusion of the lily's, if when it looked upon its fine raiment it thought that it was on account of the raiment that the God loved it?
Similarly, there was no compelling reason for God to become man
in Jesus other
than that it was according to his good
pleasure.
I guess that C.S. Lewis — here at least — spoke of
pleasure rather
than of Christian happiness which, of course, can not be found
in any outwardly oriented religion if we are not indwelt by the Holy Spirit who gives us love, joy, peace, and much more (Gal 5:22 - 23).
It is a distinct
pleasure to respond to the critique of Father Eric C. Meyer, who was the first Catholic theologian to respond seriously to my work, and who
in many ways knows my own position, or, at least my route to it, better
than I do myself.
But just about every militant or staunch anti-theist just seems to only take
pleasure in demeaning those they feel or think are less
than themselves.
But it is through the mutual self - giving
in love that our humanity is established (whether
in sex or beyond), rather
than the abstract experience of
pleasure or the fulfillment of a craving or felt need.
I feel that the religious excitement that is supposed to come to people who meditate on the flame of a single dark candle
in an otherwise dark room was no greater
than the
pleasure I felt when I looked down a gun - sight and become very close to my own mind and consciousness.
So is the common phenomenon of spouses finding much greater
pleasure emotionally
in the company of other persons of their gender,
than in their relationship with their spouses.
I would tell every single person out there that there is nothing more precious
than the promise of God, and nothing more important to strive for, nothing too hard to give up whether it is sin, or
pleasure, or gold, or a job... nothing matters but loving God and loving that person
in the way that God says.
The child Lewis — an Ulster Protestant with the usual hostility towards papists — would have been amazed at the adult Lewis» thoroughly Catholic theology of
pleasure: «There is no good
in trying to be more spiritual
than God.
In the end, he suspects, «we are likely to find the One for whom we long less in the clouds of spiritual heights than far down the mountain in the soulful depths — in the mundane particularities, the fierce complexities, the simple pleasures of everyday life.&raqu
In the end, he suspects, «we are likely to find the One for whom we long less
in the clouds of spiritual heights than far down the mountain in the soulful depths — in the mundane particularities, the fierce complexities, the simple pleasures of everyday life.&raqu
in the clouds of spiritual heights
than far down the mountain
in the soulful depths — in the mundane particularities, the fierce complexities, the simple pleasures of everyday life.&raqu
in the soulful depths —
in the mundane particularities, the fierce complexities, the simple pleasures of everyday life.&raqu
in the mundane particularities, the fierce complexities, the simple
pleasures of everyday life.»
By this person's statement it makes me think of them choosing the oppisite of what Moses chose as we see
in Hebrews 11:24 - 26 By faith Moses, when he was come to years, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh's daughter; 25Choosing rather to suffer affliction with the people of God,
than to enjoy the
pleasures of sin for a season; 26Esteeming the reproach of Christ greater riches
than the treasures
in Egypt: for he had respect unto the recompence of the reward.
What we want to know is whether untrained communal singing is
in itself any more edifying
than other popular
pleasures.
(21) Most couples achieve something less
than heaven
in bed and yet value and cherish the
pleasure they do enjoy together.
I know that there is nothing better for them [mankind]
than to be happy and enjoy themselves as long as they live; also that it is God's gift to man that every one should eat and drink and take
pleasure in all his toil.
Sex without companionship
in marriage is better
than no sex at all; but its
pleasure falls far short of sex within a relationship of loving and trusting.
But is it not likely that our male - dominated society «represses,»
in Freud's sense, the realization that women guided by instinct and
pleasure alone could cause far more havoc
than men motivated by the same factors?
Such surrender might afford a certain kind of
pleasure, but
in this case the
pleasure came from being possessed rather
than from possessing.
Two of these — «Flower of Purity» and «Gentle Guide of Youth» — are especially relevant to our current theme
In the Novena he composed in preparation for the Feast of St Philip, Cardinal Newman wrote: «Philip, well knowing the pleasure God takes in cleanness of heart, had no sooner come to years of discretion, and to the power of distinguishing between good and evil, than he set himself to wage war against the evils and suggestions of his enemy, and never rested till he had gained the victor
In the Novena he composed
in preparation for the Feast of St Philip, Cardinal Newman wrote: «Philip, well knowing the pleasure God takes in cleanness of heart, had no sooner come to years of discretion, and to the power of distinguishing between good and evil, than he set himself to wage war against the evils and suggestions of his enemy, and never rested till he had gained the victor
in preparation for the Feast of St Philip, Cardinal Newman wrote: «Philip, well knowing the
pleasure God takes
in cleanness of heart, had no sooner come to years of discretion, and to the power of distinguishing between good and evil, than he set himself to wage war against the evils and suggestions of his enemy, and never rested till he had gained the victor
in cleanness of heart, had no sooner come to years of discretion, and to the power of distinguishing between good and evil,
than he set himself to wage war against the evils and suggestions of his enemy, and never rested till he had gained the victory.
Some people never do evolve much further
than that even though they become more cunning
in the ways of experiencing
pleasure and avoiding pain.
As for your «temporal
pleasures» comment... enjoy your faith
in what you have waiting for you be it 72 virgins, valhalla, heaven, whatever... no one knows and you are not any different
than anyone else
in that aspect.
atheism is a cop - out for lazy persons who are
in need of experiencing happiness and truth rather
than temporal
pleasures.
What he plainly sought quite a lot of was
pleasure and fame, and
in that regard he may have had something
in common with Sartre that was more important
than what divided them.
The See of Peter fell into the hands of men who were more interested
in using it as a power
in Italian politics,
in aggrandizing the members of their families, or
in promoting art and their own personal
pleasures than they were
in making it effective
in furthering the spiritual and moral life of Europe.
I know that there is nothing better for them
than to be happy and enjoy themselves as long as they live; also that it is God's gift to man that every one should eat and drink and take
pleasure in all his toil.
I've heard preachers talk about how anything can be an idol - things, activities, people - basically anything that brings you
pleasure is
in competition with God and you should feel guilt and worry that you might secretly like that thing or that activity or that person MORE
than God.
When I met sometimes with merry companions, and my heart was ready to sink, I would labor to put on as cheerful a countenance as possible, that they might not distrust anything, and sometimes would begin some discourse with young men or young women on purpose, or propose a merry song, lest the distress of my soul would be discovered, or mistrusted, when at the same time I would then rather have been
in a wilderness
in exile,
than with them or any of their
pleasures or enjoyments.
The hookup culture also inhibits ethical development through a focus on private indulgence
in which other people are used for
pleasure, rather
than on loving, committed relationships.
Many scientists do give up personal convenience and worldly
pleasures, but less from any deliberate unselfishness
than from interest
in their work.
As long as mankind is what they are, there will NEVER be peace among us, certainly not global peace
in any meaningful sense, and anyone who thinks otherwise is either dangerously naïve or pathetically stupid, frankly.Knock the dust off your Bible, Benedict!The great Apostle Paul predicted today's situatio perfectly over 2,000 years ago, and I quote: «But know this: difficult times will come
in the last days.For people will be lovers of self, lovers of money, boastful, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, ungrateful, unholy, unloving, irreconcilable, slanderers, without self - control, brutal, without love for what is good, traitors, reckless, conceited, loversof
pleasures rather
than lovers of God, holding to the form of religion but denying its power»... (2nd Timothy 3:1 - 5)- Hello!
In which I take some perhaps less
than Christian
pleasure.
This school of thought aimed to maximize «
pleasure over a whole life, rather
than in the present moment.»
and sees it as more basic
in man
than Freud's will - to -
pleasure or Adler's will to - power.
I perceived that there is nothing better for them
than to be joyful and to do good as long as they live; also that everyone should eat and drink and take
pleasure in all his toil — this is God's gift to man (Ecclesiastes 3:12 - 13).
That is, the ascetic holds that something other
than pleasure and pain should be considered
in determining whether some act is acceptable.
turns out to be the means by which virtuous societies no less
than virtuous ladies are led
in pleasure down the path of self - destruction.
I think that what I felt each minute was worth more
than all the outward comfort and
pleasure which I had enjoyed
in my whole life put together.
In Romans 1:21 - 28, Paul talks about people who refused to acknowledge and glorify God (v. 21), the worshipping of idols (v23), people who were more interested in earthly pursuits than spiritual pursuits (v. 25), people who gave up their natural, innate passion for the opposite s e x in search of pleasure (v. 26 - 27), and people who live lives full of covetousness, malice, envy, and hatred of God (v. 29 - 31
In Romans 1:21 - 28, Paul talks about people who refused to acknowledge and glorify God (v. 21), the worshipping of idols (v23), people who were more interested
in earthly pursuits than spiritual pursuits (v. 25), people who gave up their natural, innate passion for the opposite s e x in search of pleasure (v. 26 - 27), and people who live lives full of covetousness, malice, envy, and hatred of God (v. 29 - 31
in earthly pursuits
than spiritual pursuits (v. 25), people who gave up their natural, innate passion for the opposite s e x
in search of pleasure (v. 26 - 27), and people who live lives full of covetousness, malice, envy, and hatred of God (v. 29 - 31
in search of
pleasure (v. 26 - 27), and people who live lives full of covetousness, malice, envy, and hatred of God (v. 29 - 31).
It asserts that sexual
pleasure comes from demeaning, exploiting, objectifying and degrading our partners
in the most intimate ways, rather
than from an eager and passionate cherishing of the wholeness of that partner.