Somehow, academic theology is thought to be more important and profound
than the practical theology that grows out of the black church experience.
Not exact matches
Indeed, in a complex society where no one can grasp more
than a few of the details, some of the most important
practical theology will have to be done by specialists in medicine, law or business, or by theologians and ethicists whose training equips them for specialized roles in those institutions.
Contemporary
practical theology is thus more
than the «application» of theological concepts to one social situation or another.
More
than 1,000 people are expected to enjoy a mixture of accessible
practical theology for new believers and deeper Bible study this year.
These objectives are often very important, but few who measure
practical theology in terms of pastoral skills recognize how much knowledge is required to do any of these things in ways that will yield more
than short - term success.
In varying degrees, most of them want
practical theology to become more critical and philosophical, more public (in the sense of being more oriented toward the church's ministry to the world rather
than simply preoccupied with the needs of its own internal life), and more related to an analysis of the various situations and contexts of
theology.
Administrators worry that doctoral students increasingly will be trained in the history of religion or comparative religions rather
than in Bible,
theology, ethics, church history and
practical studies — the traditional fields of theological education.
In general, I wondered about Boulton's emphasis on the «
practical»: If proper
theology and proper Christian formation go hand - in - hand, which «speculative» (rather
than strictly «
practical») theologian would disagree?
He saw the students as less interested in real
theology than in the
practical element in Christianity.
Methodologically speaking, however, systematics is a dialogue with a different public
than those of philosophical and
practical theology, theirs being the academy on the one hand, and society at large on the other.
While I owe much to the stimulating ideas of Don Browning, David Tracy and James Fowler in
Practical Theology, I wish to attempt a small, constructive personal contribution rather
than to enter into dialogue with them.
But many critics tend to want to debate nuances of
theology rather
than engage head - on the
practical realities that many people are facing.
At the same time, the other
theologies that have contributed most to explicating and justifying the metaphysical implications of the Christian witness seem to have been typically preoccupied more with theoretical questions of belief and truth
than with
practical issues of action and justice, and so have contributed only indirectly to clarifying and answering our central question.
Most of the others were based more on favorite
theologies than any
practical or relevant strategies for successfully dealing with addiction.