Sentences with phrase «than the rear one»

They may have higher limits in rear - facing weight (up to 40 — 50 pounds) and height than rear - facing — only seats, which make them ideal for bigger babies and toddlers.

Many have higher limits in rear - facing weight (up to 40 — 50 pounds) and height than rear - facing — only seats, which make them ideal for bigger babies and toddlers.

It's designed for extended rear - facing use for kids from 14 - 50 pounds, which is higher than the rear - facing limit for most models on the market.

When looking at all factors it's even safer than the rear.

Kids are perfectly fine crossing their legs and do not «want» to forward face because they have never known anything other than rear facing.

Because the front wheel is larger than the rear wheels it has better maneuverability can helps to move on uneven surface.

Our son was such a heavy weight (he's actually lighter at 2 1/2 than 1 1/2) so we were able to forward face him since he weighed more than the rear facing car seat limits but our daughter will be rear facing until two because she isn't nearly as big as her brother - at least not yet.

Front facing car seats sit a little more upright than rear facing ones and are a great position for budding toddlers who are starting to be more mobile.

Not only is it as safe, or safer, than the rear but kids also have far more leg space.

It's actually just as safe, or safer, than the rear when looking at all the factors as discussed here.

The brains of fish with enhanced social skills were not bigger overall than those reared in small groups; however, the «architecture» within the brain was different.

Post's first burger took three months to manufacture and cost an indigestion - inducing $ 260,000, but he hopes to refine the procedure until it is more cost - effective than rearing animals for food.

They reported that front leg peak hip angle was always more acute than the rear leg peak hip angle.

The 2015 Audi RS 3 is composed and compliant going into corners, although the car feels far less lively than the rear - wheel - drive M135i.

Who would have thought that the AMG would be less composed overall than its rear - engine rival?

The only storage other than the rear seats is a small space about the size of a beach cooler under the rear hatch.

competence of the above, but subjectively there feels slightly more to engage with in this car than the rear - wheel drive Carrera.

Audi even flared the front wheel arches to accommodate the optional 255 / 30R -19 tires, which are almost an inch wider than the rears.

Conversely, on a dry track you will set a decent lap time, but it will be the front tyres that get worked harder than the rears.

They are much thinner than rear window wires, but their density (wires per inch) is much greater.

Unfortunately, it does so in a $ 120,805 hybrid that gets 23 mpg on the highway — the same highway mileage as the all - wheel - drive LS 460 and 1 mpg worse than the rear - drive version.

As mentioned, both the 928 and Panamera are front - engine cars meant to be larger and more practical than the rear - engine 911.

The DSC system is relatively easy to trigger, but unless you're particularly brutal it's quick to release its electronic grip, and if anything it's the nose that's likely to relinquish its grip rather than the rear.

I found a forum thread here where a person claims that the CRV requires «3 % difference, fronts rotating faster than the rear, before engaging the rear differential».

The trick is that the spider gear pushes on the front side gear in a different place than the rear side gear.

Building on the themes of the DS, it featured hydro - pneumatic suspension, steering, and brakes, and a smooth, radically tapered body design (the front track is nearly eight inches wider than the rear) that was shaped by aerodynamics.

On a FWD car (as most VWs are) the fronts will wear much faster than the rears.

With its traditional front - engine layout, it may well be easier for most people to drive close to the limit than the rear - engine Porsche.

Over-steer conditions will be exacerbated if the front tires have significantly more grip than the rear, as they will allow faster corner entry than the low grip rear tires can't handle: resulting in a spin.

Not all Elan «M100's were turbocharged, but the majority were, and the unusual choice of front - wheel drive was - as you might expect from Lotus - selected for sound performance reasons, with more predictable high - speed handling than a rear - drive car and improved traction.

From behind the wheel, xDrive cars feel no heavier or slower than their rear - wheel - drive siblings.

Driving style - I like my Subaru a couple of psi over recommendations, with the fronts a little higher than the rears, as this fits my cornering style

Fun facts: the Z / 28's front tires are wider than the rears on a Porsche 911 Carrera S, and its rear brakes are bigger than the fronts on a 911 GT3.

My 16 inch wheel pressure recommendations have the fronts about three psi higher than the rears.

In the wet you're quickly mindful that the front - end responds more rapidly than the rear - end can support, but in the dry you can lean on the nose with greater conviction and trust in the available traction and inherent balance of the chassis.

At all speeds the RP1 feels beautifully balanced, with the front end displaying perhaps just a touch more bite than the rear.

Like any 3 Series, the rear - wheel - drive 335is benefits from near - 50 / 50 weight distribution — slightly closer to it, in fact, than the rear - drive 335i coupe.

However, the diesel - powered model is $ 8,800 more than a rear - drive 530e iPerformance and $ 7,050 more than a 530e xDrive iPerformance, both of which are currently the most fuel efficient 5 Series models available.

That means, proportionally, that the front axle has less mechanical grip than the rear — or, as the Porsche engineers were quick to point out, that the rear has more grip thanks to even wider tyres than before.

Overall, it feels front - rather than rear - wheel drive, and with the back axle unwilling to play a part in cornering, it lacks the adjustability traditional sports car buyers will crave.

The direct steering communicates more of what's going on at the front tires than some rear - wheel - drive competitors.

I think if you look closely at most cars on the road you will find that it is normal for front wheels to be dirtier than rear wheels.

The 4MATIC, despite its 70 kilo weight penalty, gives the impression of being lighter and lither than the rear - driver.

Its tendency to understeer was more pronounced in the dry handling test, with the front tyres overwhelmed far earlier than the rears.

The smart guys on the Vanderhall project tell us that front - wheel drive delivers a far more stable and predictable dynamic package in a three - wheeler than rear - wheel drive.

A multi-plate breakaway clutch, which essentially functions like a limited slip differential allows the front wheels to rotate faster than the rears as the car enters a corner, promoting better turn in to optimize handling.

The front parking sensors sound a different note than the rears, so it's easy to judge proximity from the car ahead.

One of the less - common situations where front wheel braking can be worse than rear wheel braking is when slowing with a loaded trailer.

However, front row seats are more comfortable than the rear seat.

So front is more efficient than rear in case of rear weight biased car.