Sentences with phrase «than the scientists whose»

Not exact matches

«There's more intersection between the technology industry and policy than ever before,» said Levie, whose trademark mad - scientist hair showed signs of gray, countered by youthful bright orange sneakers.

Like the religious objectors, scientists wishing to separate faith and reason — a minority, but a noisy one — claim that nature, which they often think of as self - subsistent rather than as created, can not be reconciled to God, whose existence they often deny.

The biology teacher, Scopes, whose trial for teaching evolution played so dramatic a role, was an active Methodist supported by fellow church members rather than an anti-Christian scientist.

It's also why I invite comments and critiques from faithful collaborators — pastors, scholars, artists, scientists, doctors, parents, blog commenters, and editors — who often know more about a given topic than I and whose insights improve my writing by miles.

AAAS President Susan Hockfield and APS President Laura H. Greene, whose scientific societies represent more than 170,000 scientists and engineers, called on Rouhani to step in and examine «irregularities» in the handling of charges leveled against the a 45 - year - old Djalali.

Columbia University scientists found that depression was 24 percent more common in teens whose parents let them go to bed at midnight or later than in kids whose moms and dads required them to hit the pillow by 10 P.M..

Although critics of the HRG amendment cite many examples of scientists whose contracts are supposedly not renewed because of the new laws, the changes will actually provide better long - term security for young scientists than they currently have.

In the current study, scientists screened more than 60,000 bacterial genomes for the presence of proteins whose chemical makeup suggested they could be capable of forming prions.

More than half a kilometre beneath the Devon Ice Cap, scientists discovered two lakes whose extreme saltiness could make them a habitat for microbes — an environment that might also exist on Jupiter's icy moon Europa.

Amyloid — an abnormal protein whose accumulation in the brain is a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease — starts accumulating inside neurons of people as young as 20, a much younger age than scientists ever imagined, reports a surprising new Northwestern Medicine study.

Amyloid — an abnormal protein whose accumulation in the brain is a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease — starts accumulating inside neurons of people as young as 20, a much younger age than scientists ever imagined.

For pancreatic cancer, scientists have catalogued dozens of microRNAs whose levels are different than in healthy samples.

«There are quite a few scientists like Claude — all from a slightly earlier era, when glaciology was not the cover - of - Rolling - Stone enterprise that it is today — whose accomplishments are as great or greater than most of the «big names» in the business today, but who are essentially unknown outside their immediate circle,» he said.

A team including scientists at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, found that women whose breast cancer had begun to spread and who tested positive in the αB - crystallin test were three times more likely to have disease that spread to the brain than those who tested negative.

Skilled missile designers whose earnings were once second only to those of miners are now earning less than cleaners in a Moscow bank, while scientists at military research laboratories, the feted elite of a decade ago, sometimes go without their wages altogether.

The squalid conditions in which the animals lived also helped spark an animal rights movement in the 19th century and provided the impetus for the opening, in 1828, of a garden in Regent's Park devoted to «the advancement of Zoology and Animal Physiology,» whose goal would be to inspire scientists «rather than encouraging the «vulgar admiration» of the public.»

Many scientists believe that disease - causing mutations are easier to find in genetically homogenous populations, such as Iceland's, whose genomes have less «noise» than those of more diverse societies.

Although that's still really cold, it's a much higher temperature than scientists expected, and it falls within the operating range of so - called «high - temperature superconductors,» whose discovery in 1986 set off a frenzy of research because of the revolutionary impact these perfectly efficient electrical transmitters could have on society.

In order to reinforce their results, the scientists compared their data with more than 200 bones from modern mammals, whose diet is known, as well as with fossil specimens from both carnivores and herbivores.

In making their award, the Kavli Nanoscience Prize committee has selected a scientist whose work, over more than five decades, has improved understanding of how and why the thermal, electrical, and other characteristics of materials structured at the nanoscale can be dramatically different from those of the same materials at larger dimensions.

Izumi Tabata is a physician and scientist whose intense research showed that over a six - week period, 120 minutes of shorts bursts of high intensity training gave far better fitness results than 1800 minutes of regular steady - state training.

Makeup artist James Kaliardos believes that a strong set of arches creates an automatic air of confidence, and a 2013 study seemingly backs up his claims: Scientists discovered that women with «greater facial contrast» — specifically in the eyebrow region — were perceived as «younger» than those whose arches were not cosmetically enhanced.

The lead scientist played by Michael Stuhlbarg certainly has a different agenda than the military, whose focus seems to be more on preventing the Russians (closer than you think) from stealing the asset than in actually seizing the rare scientific opportunity for advancement.

Several turning points rely far too heavily upon bickering nerdy scientists Charlie Day and Burn Giorman, whose contributions should have amounted to little more than comic relief but who are called on to plug plot holes, much to the story's detriment.

The story mines territory familiar to Picoult — family, memory and identity — as it follows 13 - year - old Jenna Metcalf, whose mother Alice (a scientist specializing in elephant behavior) went missing in the wake of a tragic accident more than a decade ago.

The scientists, led by Charles Foley of the conservation society, focused on a terrible drought in 1993 and the fates of three family groups, two of which — led by older females — left the park, found water, and had a higher survival rate for calves than a group whose older females were killed by poachers seeking their tusks.

Roy Spencer is one of the less than 3 % of climate scientists whose research suggests that humans are playing a relatively minimal role in global warming.

• Gore used opinions of government scientists whose work can not verified • The practice of rainmaking is more art than a science • The practice of stopping global warming is more politics than science • Making rain is local • Stopping warming is global • Rainmakers are positive blaming neither man nor nature for a lack of rain • Warm stoppers are negative blaming humanity for causing warming • Rainmakers do not get paid if they do not produce • Warm stoppers are paid to create alarm about warming

For a survey of scientific opinions, rather than the published work, see Doran 2009, whose survey found that among scientists who had more than half of their recent work on climate (i.e., who are actively researching the matter), 97 % agreed that:

«More than two - thirds of all authors of chapter 9 of the IPCC's 2007 climate - science assessment are part of a clique whose members have co-authored papers with each other... the majority of scientists who are skeptical of a human influence on climate significant enough to be damaging to the planet were unrepresented in the authorship of chapter 9.»

That list includes two of the most infamous, discredited scientist - activists of the 20th Century — Carson, whose fake analysis led to the global ban on DDT that has caused millions of deaths from malaria, and Ehrlich, whose absurd visions of a «population bomb» laid the foundation for China's horrific One Child policy.34 The third icon listed by Brulle, Barry Commoner, was far better known as a political activist and «eco-socialist» presidential candidate than as a scientist.

Photograph: Aaron Tilley for the Guardian Roy Spencer is one of the less than 3 % of climate scientists whose research suggests that humans are playing a relatively minimal role in global warming.

< a href = «http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/28222"Wegener, Milankovich, Koppen Three scientists whose work is more important than everything produced and promoted by the IPCC.

We can find climate scientists who give lower estimates of climate's sensitivity to CO2 whose arguments are better grounded in science than any number of eco-warriors whose arguments are irrational, emotional, and lack any sense of proportion.

It would seem the GWPF is far more confident in its conclusions about climate sensitivity than the scientists on whose work its estimates are derived.

That excess is apparent to the alleged Three Percenters, to industrial scientists, to engineers, and to a respectable, growing handful of laymen scattered amongst those whose ideas ate no more than 140 characters long, some genuine whackos, and the otherwise uneducated.

Many of the people whose pockets might be hurt by expenses for combating warming are quite happy to see the issues dumped solely into the laps of the scientists, perhaps because they know that scientific studies always raise more questions than they answer, and so the issue of whether science has spoken on the issue can be indefinitely postponed.

The study cites Spencer and Bast along with other «manufacturers of doubt,» whose work to undermine the public understanding of this consensus has been stunningly successful — only 12 percent of Americans, their previous work found, know that more than 90 percent of scientists agree on this — and has resulted in «cascading effects on public understanding that climate change is happening, human caused, a serious threat, and in turn, support for climate change mitigation and adaptation policies.»

Nikola Tesla claimed that relativity was something whose «exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists,» yet relativity has also been demonstrated.

Lomborg, whose 2001 book suggested the planet should adapt to global warming rather than wasting resources trying to prevent it, has made his name by accusing scientists and others of exaggerating the extent and effects of climate change.

What is being touted as a scientific scandal is more about data handling than what rising temperatures show, according to phone and email interviews with more than two dozen experts on the issue, including the former government scientist, whose blogging Saturday reignited a debate.

If you say «Evolution is probably true» that means something much different to a scientist than to a journalist whose last science class was in high school.