Sentences with phrase «than this example given»

Not exact matches

Maybe those experiences can give these founders an advantage: more financial awareness than founders who haven't been burdened by hefty student loans, for example.

A Signature Story gives you the opportunity to highlight specific aspects of your brand through example, rather than declaration.

For example, if a team is working on coming up with new product ideas, they could be given a variety of constraints to work with like «only items made from recycled materials» or «only things that weigh less than a pillow.»

Bezos gives an example of his being overruled, though one senses his example is the exemption rather than the rule.

Stacy Tetschner cites as an example Scott Ginsberg, who has given more than 400 speeches to 250,000 people around the world about how he meets people by wearing a nametag 24/7.

He gave the example of Russian President Vladimir Putin, who he would argue has less power today than five years ago because of economic turmoil caused by sanctions and a middle class of an unprecedented size and aspirations.

While the editors do give key players a shout - out — Google, for example, dominates the list — the purpose of the annual compilation goes further than giving credit to innovating companies.

One example that I read about, Stanford University, a teacher in artificial intelligence offered a class, a couple of hundred kids in the class, he offered it online to 30,000 people, or 20,000 people, and if I remember correctly when he gave the test there were 400 people, or something like that, that did better than the number one kid at Stanford.

For example, the expected timing and likelihood of completion of the proposed merger, including the timing, receipt and terms and conditions of any required governmental and regulatory approvals of the proposed merger that could reduce anticipated benefits or cause the parties to abandon the transaction, the ability to successfully integrate the businesses, the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances that could give rise to the termination of the merger agreement, the possibility that Kraft shareholders may not approve the merger agreement, the risk that the parties may not be able to satisfy the conditions to the proposed transaction in a timely manner or at all, risks related to disruption of management time from ongoing business operations due to the proposed transaction, the risk that any announcements relating to the proposed transaction could have adverse effects on the market price of Kraft's common stock, and the risk that the proposed transaction and its announcement could have an adverse effect on the ability of Kraft and Heinz to retain customers and retain and hire key personnel and maintain relationships with their suppliers and customers and on their operating results and businesses generally, problems may arise in successfully integrating the businesses of the companies, which may result in the combined company not operating as effectively and efficiently as expected, the combined company may be unable to achieve cost - cutting synergies or it may take longer than expected to achieve those synergies, and other factors.

Given the sheer size of user - generated websites (for example, Facebook alone has more than 1 billion users, and YouTube users upload 100 hours of video every minute), it would be infeasible for online intermediaries to prevent objectionable content from cropping up on their site.

I'd like to give you a specific example of how active income feels better than passive income.

A rising line denotes inflation data that was reported higher than the median economist's estimate for a given report (for example, the ISM prices paid indices, the CPI, the PPI, and so forth).

If, for example, a given individual security in a market is offering a more attractive risk - adjusted future return than all of the other securities, and if investors know this, then they will try to buy that security, selling the others as necessary to raise funds.

For example: Is our economy ruined because of immigrants coming to our country, or is it ruined because the companies who are supposed to be boosting our economy with new jobs are instead giving those jobs to cheaper labor that can be exploited for wages far less than minimum?

His thesis is that integral truth (the combination of intuited truth, reasoned truth, and truth experienced through the senses) comes much closer to absolute truth than reason, alone and he gives a lot of examples of how truth has been intuited by Scientists, Mathematicians, artists, etc. throughout the ages to make his point.

Let me give an example of christian persecution, and this one happened less than 3 years ago.

(For example, given Wright's understanding of what the Reformers meant by «literal,» I wonder if they wouldn't be open to scholarship that interprets Genesis 1 as an ancient Near Eastern temple text — see John Walton's The Lost World of Genesis One — rather than a scientific explanation for origins.)

Probably I can explain what I have in mind better by giving a concrete proposal as an example than by talking about what it would be like.

He gives examples of complex systems of relationships that are made up of several different levels, in each case attempting to answer the question, «how is the whole greater than the sum of the parts?»

First, though most Christians do not speak hatefully toward others or about others, the sad reality is that the media and the internet gives such examples of hate speech from Christians way more publicity than it deserves, which in turn gives the impression that this is the way all Christians are, which is not true.

One might well question, at this point, the validity of nonreligious interpretation, asking whether Bonhoeffer has given us any example of non-religious interpretation rather than speaking only of its importance.

One does not miss the way because of orientation or marriage we miss the way because we choose our way rather than the simply example Jesus gave.

To be clear, you just said, «I don't care how many examples you give me of Muslims acting differently than I believe, you can't convince me otherwise.»

Let me give you some examples of people you could try to develop relationships with: atheists, abortion doctors, homosexuals, pornographers, strippers, prostitutes, drug addicts, alcoholics, people who have different theological views than you do, people with different political views, etc..

Mark Sayers would have been better off using Kerouac as an example of the changes that were taking place in culture than to give Kerouac the credit for being the genesis and originator of these changes.

(I find this exercise helpful when I am investing excessive energy in a part of my body that is giving me trouble — for example, «I have teeth and they are causing me discomfort at this moment, but I am more than my teeth.»)

For the one you choose, please say why it is any more ridiculous than the rest of the garbage Catholics swallow and give an example of a non-Catholic belief which is just as stupid.

Another example, I had to prove a point to someone that «crucifixtion» was a common punishment, that was specifially given to Jesus to show that he didn't deserve any more than the common criminal.

Frogist, you are giving examples of insitutions that are more selective on who they let through the door than any house of worship.

If all these examples don't convince you I don't know what will, I mean I have given you solid, 100 % proof and if you still disbelieve than you are just a puppet of satan and I have every right to refuse to listen to your evil lies!

The given example is that laundry - doing robots could access the database to figure out what sort of clothing items are what, and how to fold and iron them differently, but don't worry; robots will surely think of more interesting things to do with the Internet than laundry.

To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....

Because It was not created for that reason whether were males or females... nor it was meant that men go for men or women go for women... And those laws were among God's commandments to mankind which he had narrated as a sin within his Holy Scriptures and the Holy Quran giving examples of ancient generations that were doomed for disbelieving and breaking heavenly laws... those narrated tales were for us to learn and take heed rather than repeat same ill doing...

And rather than type what it sounds like, I will give you an example from YouTube.

For example, only 37 percent of the modernist Catholics held pro-life positions on abortion and more than half gave economic problems top priority.

Or, to give a more familiar example, within Christianity Roman Catholicism is generally more concerned about boundaries than is Anglicanism.

He explains the Theological interpretation of Scripture better than the other books, provides some examples of how to do this with Scripture, and when he does not give an explanation of «how to» do it yourself, explains why such an explanation is impossible (p. 195).

for example, that the dignity of all persons ought to be respected, that tolerance is a virtue and discrimination is abhorrent, that peaceful resolution of conflicts is superior to violence, that generally truth - telling is superior to lying, that democratic government is morally superior to totalitarianism and authoritarianism, that one ought to give a day's work for a day's pay, that saving for one's own and one's country's future is better than squandering one's income and relying on others to attend to one's future needs.

«For example, the gap among voting blocs that gave a B or better to the Republicans versus the Democrats was greater among white evangelicals than all other religious groups and all voters, as reported in these data,» he wrote.

Dr Janet Smith, on the Catholic World Report website, gave what may be something like an authoritative commentary (worth reading at much greater length than I can quote it here) on the particular example the Pope chose, one which caused a considerable raising of eyebrows.

«19 Lack of space prevents giving more than a few brief examples of laws taken from the Code, but these may serve to give the flavor of the whole.

Only a few examples can be given to illustrate the complex interweaving of consequences generated by new technologies.25 World War II was the first war in which there were more deaths from battle than from disease.

If we look at these two examples there is a common thread - the technology appropriated by the culture gives expression of that culture and, in the case of the Coke bottle, the technology may even be used for purposes other than its original intent that give expression to the culture in which it is embedded.

It's disheartening to hear how much a church spent stooping to a lesser level, rather than leading by the example of simply giving.

If reconciliation is indeed the basic Christian experience, we would be justified in giving greater attention to the latter models (liberator and moral example) than the former (penal substitute and sacrificial victim).10

For example, the United States gives only less than 0.2 per cent, instead of 0.7 per cent.

For example, for the frequently used word «events» (used in describing natural phenomena in space - time coordinate systems) he substituted the term «actual occasions,» which for him gave a more accurate (and richer) picture of «real» or «concrete» happenings in the natural world.11 In this regard, he avoided the use of such commonly employed metaphysical terms such as «sensation» and «perception» — derived from seventeenth and eighteenth philosophers such as Locke, Berkeley, Hume and Kant — since for him they had a narrow psychological rather than appropriate epistemological meanings.

In the version of the Ten Commandments given in Deuteronomy, for example, the Sabbath is identified not with the creation, but with the Exodus, and this version is perhaps 150 years older than the Priestly tradition.

Also non-scholars, though this concerns us here less directly: a graphic example was the article «The Moslem World» (actually on its religion) in Time, August 31, 1951, pp. 32 - 37, which gave great offense in the Muslim world and resulted in Time's being banned for a while in more than one Muslim country.

For example, when a man «gives up his life to care for his mother» one may look for something more than love going on.