Sentences with phrase «than vote how»

Not exact matches

The folks in and around the Duluth metro area know how to rock the vote — more than 70 % of residents 18 and older turn out on Tuesdays to cast a ballot, according to data from the American Community Survey.
But the story is bigger than vote tallies — by how much did these ballots pass?
If your Shares are held through the 401 (k) Plan or the Wal - Mart Puerto Rico 401 (k) Plan, you must provide instructions on how you wish to vote your Shares held through such plans no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on June 2, 2015.
And, as America votes for a new president in less than a week, how do we make sure that our enormous health care challenges and opportunities play a larger role in the national conversation?
It is getting tiresome hearing everyone on the radio yapping about how voters were conned by the slick campaign machinery to vote NDP; or that we voted against the PCs rather than for the NDP; or that we were angry and so made rash decisions that we will promptly regret because everyone knows what a hash the NDP have made wherever they have reigned.
They can spew their bafflegab about how they are going to get the pipeline built (in order to pander for votes from the gullible and unwise) but their inaction speaks louder than their words.
A large percentage of the electorate will vote for or against Obama for reasons other than how effective he has been.
In Harris» narrative, it's hard to see exactly how she comes to the conclusion that concerns for «the poor's rights» demand aligning with liberal politics rather than those of Christian conservatives, but by the end, Harris finds herself on the opposite side of the political spectrum, voting with those she had envisioned as the manifestation of evil while growing up.
In that way how is your statement any different than those African Americans who state that the only reason that they will vote for Obama is because he is African American?
It is all about hiding, disguising the truth until it becomes of the past just as that as did that unlawful country was recognized by the USA with out the UN majority vote and UN members were to face the Reality that the USA is taking advantage of her majority states and voting power rather than the majority of the UN member countries no matter how small or poor they are although at that time the majority of member countries were under occoupation or protection of USA and Allies and after the WW1 & 2!
Rather than competing for congressional votes, sponsors of two religious persecution bills are discussing how to combine the measures (CT, May 18, 1998, p. 20).
Why don't they play the video of Obama talking about how he dislike white people... Obama is no different than the black panthers... and so many of you fools voted for him!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is not a radical suggestion; no matter how great the candidate, no vote can ever represent more than a sign of preference, for in a sinful world, there has never been and never will be a perfect candidate.
Economy, Environment, Human Dignity, Human Rights... voting is a privilege, we should take more than just 2 minutes to decide on how to spend that vote.
Then please explain how letters, non-unanimously VOTED by humans, into a set of texts carries any more weight than anything else «written».
How is Mormons voting for him because he's Mormon any different than whites voting for him because he's white.
As a young evangelical myself, I confess I have grown tired... no, weary... of responding to comments like these with some honest suggestions for how my fellow evangelicals might avoid said retirement, only to be discounted and disparaged for believing the earth is more than 6,000 years old, for voting for Democrats from time to time, and for daring to serve communion to gays and lesbians.
Being a Christian has a lot more to do with how you live every day than how you vote every four years.
Rather than vote for another Republican President to take the country backward again, logic would call for voting for a Democrat Congress so we could actually find out how good a job President Obama could do if Congress didn't block everything.
Companies with fewer than 50 employees are not likely to be subject to federal laws that govern how employers handle leave for family and medical reasons, bereavement, military leave, jury duty, court cases and voting.
We don't know exactly how the final MVP voting will shake out other than a sure Harden win.
A value of 1 - 2 points lead with 35 % of the vote, illustrating how public perception could push a line further than Elliott's actual value.
They may account on some Trump supporters hiding their vote intention because of peer pressure / embarrassment using historical data, but if peer pressure is higher in this election than in previous elections it is difficult to tune up that effect correctly (how can you measure peer pressure to adjust your model before the election day?).
In the first indication of how Scotland might vote, Survation put the Scottish Tories at 28 % and Panelbase on 33 %, figures the party last managed more than three decades ago.
How is a system where every vote counts less democratic than one where if you don't vote for the top two candidates your vote is wasted - having the same effect as having not voted at all?
The formal definition is that if you know how everyone else is going to vote, there are circumstances where you switch your vote away from your sincere preference list and the winner will be someone higher up your preference list than it would be if you voted your sincere preferences.
Mr. SCHUMER: Madam President, of the last 26 nominations of Justices confirmed to the Supreme Court, going back to 1954, how many were confirmed without a rollcall vote or received more than 60 votes in support of their nomination either on cloture or on confirmation?
How is ensuring the winning candidate is the one with a majority of votes less democratic than a system where the winner is the candidate with the largest minority of votes?
It is really surprising how Delaware with just 3 electoral votes, has almost the same power than Virgina which has 10.
This especially struck me as a great example of how broken our current political system is - in SO elections some candidates were younger than 15 years and yet I voted for them because of quality presentation and ability to see their history of votes / answers.
A study of voters» social values provides a better indicator of how they voted than their political attitudes based on a left - right split.
Maria Miller must have been holding her breath throughout, and although she had a firm and embarrassing telling - off by Bercow for giving a lengthy statement rather than answering topical questions, she was lucky no one asked her about how appropriate she was as the new equalities minister, considering she has voted against the criminalisation of hate speech.
So I began to unravel how this had happened - how the House stays in Republican hands after 2012 because all of these blue and purple states are sending delegations to Congress that are 12 - 4 Republican or in the case of Pennsylvania, 13 - 5 Republican, even though these are blue states that voted for Barack Obama and that often voted for more Democratic candidates in the aggregate than Republicans.
For example, if Labour managed to get its act together, a big «if» I know, and they put an amendment to the voting reform bill designed to introduce AV + on to a referendum question rather than AV, how will the Liberal Democrats vote?
(1) Your question is based on the ridiculous assumption that economy and politics is a zero sum game and that somehow being «for» middle class means you're «against» (or «don't care about») poor; (2) Leaving that aside, championing the case of 75 % of population over 25 % seems like a lot less of a political suicide than championing the case of 25 % over the 75 %, unless I don't quite understand how voting works in a democracy.
Fighting the viral emails and the whisper campaigns has taken more time and resources than Obama would like, and it's still unclear how many votes they'll sway in the end.
It's not clear how many will be entitled to vote this time, but more than 100,000 people are reported to have paid # 3 to join and vote for Corbyn in 2015.
MPs will now be able to vote according to their conscience rather than told how to vote by party managers.
Here's Senate Minority Leader Dean Skelos insisting to CapTon's Mike Whittemore than it «doesn't matter how you vote» on today's budget bills because the threat of a government shutdown has essentially been averted by the two - way deal.
With less than a week to the election, people around the UK have repeatedly said that they want to vote for a leader they can trust, who gives clear answers on their policies and who can explain how they are different from everyone else.
ICM also asked a voting intention question asking how people would vote assuming that Gordon Brown was Labour leader — like YouGov's poll earlier this week this showed Labour doing worse under Brown than under Blair; with Brown as leader voting intention would be CON 40 %, LAB 37 %, LD 18 %.
However, I'm always slightly wary of constituency polls in Liberal Democrat held seats — the effect of incumbency and tactical voting is far higher for Lib Dem MPs, and when you ask a generic voting intention I think many people give their national preference, rather than how they would actually vote in their own constituency.
Look how many Tory MPs have less than 50 per cent of the vote.
If you divide up the Tejada and Lasher votes based on how Jackson and Alcantara did against each other in the six Assembly districts included in the 31st Senate District, Jackson wins a rematch by more than 2,000 votes (54.3 percent to 45.7 percent).
More than 1,100 residents from District 10 voted in the inaugural year to determine how $ 1 million of City Councilman Ydanis Rodriguez's capital funds would be spent.
At numerous sites, auditors also saw illegal electioneering — including one translator instructing voters which candidate to vote for rather than how to vote.
If you look at the cross-tabulation with how people actually voted though, considerably more people told Populus they had voted Tory to stop Labour winning than voted Labour to stop the Conservatives winning (however some people were obviously confused by the question — 32 said they voted tactically against Labour, but voted Labour).
Whereas if you let people vote online, that puts more responsibility in terms of data security into the hands of the voter (which might be perceived as positive), but knowledge about how votes will be counted or how you would go about verifying that the voting process was not corrupted, requires more than just basic computer knowledge.
I mentioned the possibility of Utah taking its 6 votes out of play only to give context that no matter how unlikely, it's more likely this year than at any time in recent memory.
He further remarked that the former President, John Mahama would have won the 2016 elections if Ghanaians voted based on how beautiful or handsome a politician is as according to him, the former President is more handsome than the sitting President.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z