Not exact matches
The folks in and around the Duluth metro area know
how to rock the
vote — more
than 70 % of residents 18 and older turn out on Tuesdays to cast a ballot, according to data from the American Community Survey.
But the story is bigger
than vote tallies — by
how much did these ballots pass?
If your Shares are held through the 401 (k) Plan or the Wal - Mart Puerto Rico 401 (k) Plan, you must provide instructions on
how you wish to
vote your Shares held through such plans no later
than 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on June 2, 2015.
And, as America
votes for a new president in less
than a week,
how do we make sure that our enormous health care challenges and opportunities play a larger role in the national conversation?
It is getting tiresome hearing everyone on the radio yapping about
how voters were conned by the slick campaign machinery to
vote NDP; or that we
voted against the PCs rather
than for the NDP; or that we were angry and so made rash decisions that we will promptly regret because everyone knows what a hash the NDP have made wherever they have reigned.
They can spew their bafflegab about
how they are going to get the pipeline built (in order to pander for
votes from the gullible and unwise) but their inaction speaks louder
than their words.
A large percentage of the electorate will
vote for or against Obama for reasons other
than how effective he has been.
In Harris» narrative, it's hard to see exactly
how she comes to the conclusion that concerns for «the poor's rights» demand aligning with liberal politics rather
than those of Christian conservatives, but by the end, Harris finds herself on the opposite side of the political spectrum,
voting with those she had envisioned as the manifestation of evil while growing up.
In that way
how is your statement any different
than those African Americans who state that the only reason that they will
vote for Obama is because he is African American?
It is all about hiding, disguising the truth until it becomes of the past just as that as did that unlawful country was recognized by the USA with out the UN majority
vote and UN members were to face the Reality that the USA is taking advantage of her majority states and
voting power rather
than the majority of the UN member countries no matter
how small or poor they are although at that time the majority of member countries were under occoupation or protection of USA and Allies and after the WW1 & 2!
Rather
than competing for congressional
votes, sponsors of two religious persecution bills are discussing
how to combine the measures (CT, May 18, 1998, p. 20).
Why don't they play the video of Obama talking about
how he dislike white people... Obama is no different
than the black panthers... and so many of you fools
voted for him!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is not a radical suggestion; no matter
how great the candidate, no
vote can ever represent more
than a sign of preference, for in a sinful world, there has never been and never will be a perfect candidate.
Economy, Environment, Human Dignity, Human Rights...
voting is a privilege, we should take more
than just 2 minutes to decide on
how to spend that
vote.
Then please explain
how letters, non-unanimously
VOTED by humans, into a set of texts carries any more weight
than anything else «written».
How is Mormons
voting for him because he's Mormon any different
than whites
voting for him because he's white.
As a young evangelical myself, I confess I have grown tired... no, weary... of responding to comments like these with some honest suggestions for
how my fellow evangelicals might avoid said retirement, only to be discounted and disparaged for believing the earth is more
than 6,000 years old, for
voting for Democrats from time to time, and for daring to serve communion to gays and lesbians.
Being a Christian has a lot more to do with
how you live every day
than how you
vote every four years.
Rather
than vote for another Republican President to take the country backward again, logic would call for
voting for a Democrat Congress so we could actually find out
how good a job President Obama could do if Congress didn't block everything.
Companies with fewer
than 50 employees are not likely to be subject to federal laws that govern
how employers handle leave for family and medical reasons, bereavement, military leave, jury duty, court cases and
voting.
We don't know exactly
how the final MVP
voting will shake out other
than a sure Harden win.
A value of 1 - 2 points lead with 35 % of the
vote, illustrating
how public perception could push a line further
than Elliott's actual value.
They may account on some Trump supporters hiding their
vote intention because of peer pressure / embarrassment using historical data, but if peer pressure is higher in this election
than in previous elections it is difficult to tune up that effect correctly (
how can you measure peer pressure to adjust your model before the election day?).
In the first indication of
how Scotland might
vote, Survation put the Scottish Tories at 28 % and Panelbase on 33 %, figures the party last managed more
than three decades ago.
How is a system where every
vote counts less democratic
than one where if you don't
vote for the top two candidates your
vote is wasted - having the same effect as having not
voted at all?
The formal definition is that if you know
how everyone else is going to
vote, there are circumstances where you switch your
vote away from your sincere preference list and the winner will be someone higher up your preference list
than it would be if you
voted your sincere preferences.
Mr. SCHUMER: Madam President, of the last 26 nominations of Justices confirmed to the Supreme Court, going back to 1954,
how many were confirmed without a rollcall
vote or received more
than 60
votes in support of their nomination either on cloture or on confirmation?
How is ensuring the winning candidate is the one with a majority of
votes less democratic
than a system where the winner is the candidate with the largest minority of
votes?
It is really surprising
how Delaware with just 3 electoral
votes, has almost the same power
than Virgina which has 10.
This especially struck me as a great example of
how broken our current political system is - in SO elections some candidates were younger
than 15 years and yet I
voted for them because of quality presentation and ability to see their history of
votes / answers.
A study of voters» social values provides a better indicator of
how they
voted than their political attitudes based on a left - right split.
Maria Miller must have been holding her breath throughout, and although she had a firm and embarrassing telling - off by Bercow for giving a lengthy statement rather
than answering topical questions, she was lucky no one asked her about
how appropriate she was as the new equalities minister, considering she has
voted against the criminalisation of hate speech.
So I began to unravel
how this had happened -
how the House stays in Republican hands after 2012 because all of these blue and purple states are sending delegations to Congress that are 12 - 4 Republican or in the case of Pennsylvania, 13 - 5 Republican, even though these are blue states that
voted for Barack Obama and that often
voted for more Democratic candidates in the aggregate
than Republicans.
For example, if Labour managed to get its act together, a big «if» I know, and they put an amendment to the
voting reform bill designed to introduce AV + on to a referendum question rather
than AV,
how will the Liberal Democrats
vote?
(1) Your question is based on the ridiculous assumption that economy and politics is a zero sum game and that somehow being «for» middle class means you're «against» (or «don't care about») poor; (2) Leaving that aside, championing the case of 75 % of population over 25 % seems like a lot less of a political suicide
than championing the case of 25 % over the 75 %, unless I don't quite understand
how voting works in a democracy.
Fighting the viral emails and the whisper campaigns has taken more time and resources
than Obama would like, and it's still unclear
how many
votes they'll sway in the end.
It's not clear
how many will be entitled to
vote this time, but more
than 100,000 people are reported to have paid # 3 to join and
vote for Corbyn in 2015.
MPs will now be able to
vote according to their conscience rather
than told
how to
vote by party managers.
Here's Senate Minority Leader Dean Skelos insisting to CapTon's Mike Whittemore
than it «doesn't matter
how you
vote» on today's budget bills because the threat of a government shutdown has essentially been averted by the two - way deal.
With less
than a week to the election, people around the UK have repeatedly said that they want to
vote for a leader they can trust, who gives clear answers on their policies and who can explain
how they are different from everyone else.
ICM also asked a
voting intention question asking
how people would
vote assuming that Gordon Brown was Labour leader — like YouGov's poll earlier this week this showed Labour doing worse under Brown
than under Blair; with Brown as leader
voting intention would be CON 40 %, LAB 37 %, LD 18 %.
However, I'm always slightly wary of constituency polls in Liberal Democrat held seats — the effect of incumbency and tactical
voting is far higher for Lib Dem MPs, and when you ask a generic
voting intention I think many people give their national preference, rather
than how they would actually
vote in their own constituency.
Look
how many Tory MPs have less
than 50 per cent of the
vote.
If you divide up the Tejada and Lasher
votes based on
how Jackson and Alcantara did against each other in the six Assembly districts included in the 31st Senate District, Jackson wins a rematch by more
than 2,000
votes (54.3 percent to 45.7 percent).
More
than 1,100 residents from District 10
voted in the inaugural year to determine
how $ 1 million of City Councilman Ydanis Rodriguez's capital funds would be spent.
At numerous sites, auditors also saw illegal electioneering — including one translator instructing voters which candidate to
vote for rather
than how to
vote.
If you look at the cross-tabulation with
how people actually
voted though, considerably more people told Populus they had
voted Tory to stop Labour winning
than voted Labour to stop the Conservatives winning (however some people were obviously confused by the question — 32 said they
voted tactically against Labour, but
voted Labour).
Whereas if you let people
vote online, that puts more responsibility in terms of data security into the hands of the voter (which might be perceived as positive), but knowledge about
how votes will be counted or
how you would go about verifying that the
voting process was not corrupted, requires more
than just basic computer knowledge.
I mentioned the possibility of Utah taking its 6
votes out of play only to give context that no matter
how unlikely, it's more likely this year
than at any time in recent memory.
He further remarked that the former President, John Mahama would have won the 2016 elections if Ghanaians
voted based on
how beautiful or handsome a politician is as according to him, the former President is more handsome
than the sitting President.