Not exact matches
Trust me, it's far more work trying to justify a delusion and rationalizing why what you believe isn't consistent with what you see in the real world
than having one answer for all the questions you people flail about trying to answer and be able to rely on simple
logic and facts to conclude there is no god.
By your
logic about «scarce public funds», surely it would be fairer to give the Child
Trust Fund only to poorer families, rather
than as a capital endowment for all young people?
Of course, we have lives to live and have come to
trust those voices that sound compelling and sensible to us on TV and in the popular media, but do keep in mind that there's a difference between rhetoric and reality and the more rhetorical and appealing it seems to one's emotions, especially as delivered by those for whom science is a kind of performance as we have today with science journalists (they are afterall selling the controversy more
than the hard facts), the more likely it requires the reader or viewer or listener to examine it more closely for the precision of its language,
logic and scientific interpretation.