Eliot commented that he was «a Catholic cast of mind, a Calvinist heritage, and a Puritanical temperament», which sounds much more like a mental illness
than a belief system.
Religion was an interesting idea more
than a belief system.
The Axial age thinkers were concerned more with self - transformation
than belief systems, and questions of theology and metaphysics were unimportant.
Not exact matches
Loyola keeping a Catholic identity helps promote real intellectual diversity in American public life (and, again, I'd say the same as to other religious universities; I can imagine some religious
belief systems that are so pernicious that, while they must be constitutionally protected, we can still say they hurt American life more
than they help it, but I think that most of the traditions that found universities do have a good deal to contribute).
It only gets complicated when we buy into
belief systems about it, rather
than our personal experience of it.
Hence, it is actually more of a
Belief System than True Science.
That has made
belief systems and arguments about facts far more important
than they were in Jesus» day.
the abundance of purely uneducated Muslim believers, their oppressive existence in their self created repressive regimes, lifestyles, and governments, their radical inturpitations of their fairy tale book, the fact that their culture and people have contributed less to man kind
than any other culture and people of all the earth, their self ritious
belief system that empowers them to commit atrocious crimes against humanity, the muslim men prance around in flip flops and linen moo moo's while they lock their woman in their household prisons to be abused slave - wife's, are entirely too ignorant to even build sewer
systems and even after thousands of years that other cultures have developed running water toilets, toilet paper, and effective sewerage
systems, they still whipe their pood - cracks with one hand (no paper) and eat with the other, and yiddle to the sky just before detonation of their suicide bombs that murder innocent men, woman, children, and babies.
In find agnostics more open - minded and less bias
than any other
belief system in the world.
Certainly enough for me to have demonstrated that your
belief system is based on a vastly higher degree of faith / improbability
than mine
To those not indoctrinated into your
belief system, everything you just wrote is nothing more
than white noise.
Not believing in God is no more a
belief system than not stamp collecting is a hobby.
Your
belief system is nothing more
than wishful thinking.
Nice point, that this was a judgement on their
belief system and their trust in it rather
than judgement upon themselves.
It has multiple meanings 1) complete trust or confidence 2) strong
belief in a religion based on spiritual apprehension rather
than proof 3) a
system of religious
belief
If people are making up religious
belief systems entirely out of their imaginations it only stands to reason that what one group of people in one part of the world come up with will be different
than what a different group in some other part of the world come up with independently.
And if they still state categorically that there is no god, then that is a
belief system, rather
than a knowledge.
Pope Benedict again reminds us: Many people today have a limited idea of the Christian faith because they identify it with a mere
system of
beliefs and values rather
than with the truth of a God who revealed Himself in history, anxious to communicate with human beings in a tête - a-tête, in a relationship of love with them.
The atheists I know did seem to just not give more
than a passing glance to the weirdness and when it was pointed out they could not fit it into their
belief system.
All you people with religious
beliefs had better sit down and consider how the real world works and how your
belief system fits in, rather
than the other way around, like you've been doing.
Religion is more
than just a set of «rules» or a
system of worship, among other things, it is also includes the
belief that anything comes in between worshiping the true God and an individual is an idol.
There are like 5 to 8 very intolerant and hostile regular posters here that love to demean and using derogatory terms toward people with a different
belief system than them.
by definition
belief in any single God or religious
systems excludes
belief in others... In that sense, Christians are no better / worse
than Buddhists, Muslims, Hindi's, Sikh's, ATHEISTS, etc, etc..
by definition
belief in any single God or religious
systems excludes
belief in others... In that sense, Christians are no better / worse
than Buddhists, Muslims, Hindi's, Sikh's, etc, etc...
Sure, other
than that atheism is such a nice
belief system.
But, yes, some pretty much are prostelyzing and defending their
belief system (or their non-
belief systems) as much and in some cases even more
than religious people do.
That's a very different political
belief system (though in my mind equally naive)
than communism.
We shall be concerned with the basic structure of Christian
belief in God rather
than with the development of theological
systems.
how is my «context» any less important
than «yours», by your own
system of
belief?
or those who have been saying that science is another «
belief system» what they don't understand is that while science has many theories, and not as many «laws» is that the rigors that are used to support theories are much more intense
than «the man in the clouds spoke to me.»
there is a topic other
than philosophy called anthropology that narrows - down the
belief systems of all peoples of the world into four different categories....
What worries me, is that most
belief systems create an illusion that one group is better
than another (saved vs not saved, believer vs infidel, etc) Many of the posts above are proof of this.
In the Church, people of different backgrounds or
belief systems than the majority are often overlooked or not approached properly.
Instantly dismissing another's
belief system as «fantasy» is much closer to discrimination
than 90 % of what I have seen here.
If atheism wants to be taken seriously as a
belief system and not just as a rejectionist, negative viewpoint then y» all have got to provide something, a sense of community or of a greater human endeavour, something more
than a flat denial.
Somehow, a
belief system that teaches people that they are the center of all the universe, created in the image of the most perfect being imaginable, strikes me as a bit more of an ego trip
than accepting that we aren't destined to live forever because of our «specialness», but that we live our short lifetimes and die like every other living thing on the planet, our bodies decomposing and ultimately entering the food chain once again, on a tiny speck of a planet in an ordinary, remote backwater of the universe.
i wonder whih god will be more pleased with its slave — the one who murdered a man for his
beliefs or the one who allowed his follower to die for his faith either way — god is a man made
belief system that is only a few thousand years old — and in that time, no one single thing has killed more humans,
than a man claiming to know the will of some kind of god Faith is good thing, faith in one's self.
Their
belief system is totally different
than ours.
What better foundation
than to have a «common
belief system» through religion, or to have or reinforce (or even invent) a common prejudice regarding someone else's religion to generate distrust towards that opponent?
It is possible that their
belief system is more more important to them
than their actual relationship.
So Idolatry the sister
belief cult like
system of atheism and evolutionism is worst
than the hillbillies.
If you choose magic, your
belief system has less basis
than mine, and even THAT
belief implies a force guiding the «magic» — you simply refuse to call it «God».
Like, for me, I strive to accept people of differing
belief systems than me.
Isn't that indirectly attacking every other
belief system other
than Christianity?
Unlike some sort of weird
belief system, or «atheists» that many christians want to make it out to be, «science» is nothing more
than the rational, logical observation and study of the world around us.
I generally put this down to very religious people (who have been raised with the concept that God is personally invested in them and is a central force in their life) experiencing the thought of a person without a religious
belief system as being close to someone soul-less: without morals and without any fear of punishment (hell), so obviously less trustworthy
than religious people who have a spiritual Big Brother and religious community watching their every move.
That means that we shall have to enter into philosophical and cultural - linguistic
systems other
than our own and show in their terms that what we say makes sense, or that that
system is in itself confused on its own terms, and that we are prepared to abandon our
beliefs if they can not make sense in other viable
systems and hence are not universal in significance.
But sometimes symbols point to things that really happened and Christianity points to something that is more
than just one of many ancient
belief systems.
You have no more or less the corner market on truth
than those who incorporate faith into their
system of
belief.
If you have a sane, coherent and logical point to make about the merits of your
belief systems over any other
than please, present it here.