Sentences with phrase «than your employer who»

Our lawyers will determine whether there is some party other than your employer who is responsible for your injury.

This type of claim is a lawsuit against someone other than an employer who is responsible for a workplace injury.

What better example can there be of an employee being exploited than an employer who puts the former's health at risk for the sake of greater profit?

Specifically included in the definition of «health plan» are group health plans (as defined in section 2791 (a) of the Public Health Service Act) with 50 or more participants or those of any size that are administered by an entity other than the employer who established and maintains the plan.

Not exact matches

One tried and true method requires that the employer insist on a note from a doctor before allowing an employee who has been out for more than several days to return to work.

A National Association of Colleges and Employers survey found that unpaid interns were no better at landing job offers than those who did no internship; and unpaid interns were paid an average $ 1,366 less in their first job than students who started cold.

That means employees who are currently exempt from overtime pay who earn less than this threshold will become nonexempt — employers will suddenly be required to pay overtime to over four million more employees within the first year of implementing the new rules.

Establishing better primary care would also save employers money, because preventing disease is cheaper than treating someone who is already sick.

An employee who spends 250 days a year with his employer, who spends more time at the office than with his or her own children on any week day, is investing most of their human experience with that employer.

Millennials aren't rewarded for staying in one job Contrary to popular belief, millennials are switching jobs less than previous generations, even though employers have stopped offering pay hikes to millennials who stick around.

As an employer, if you want to keep an employee who is getting paid lower than the average, you either should have a great company culture or a well - known brand recognition.

Employers who have fewer than 25 employees may be eligible for a tax credit that is worth as much as half of the premium costs they pay.

Millennials, in particular — who are less likely to be married, less likely to belong to organized religion, and less likely to join outside organizations than previous generations — increasingly look to employers to give their lives purpose, meaning, and a moral anchor.

Artificial intelligence is currently a $ 15 billion industry, and is expected to grow to more than $ 70 billion by 2020, meaning that employers are eager to hire people who understand its business value, and how to develop for it, so they can keep ahead of the competition.

«The person who states the salary is the loser,» says Denham, explaining that if you are the first to throw out a number, the number you give could be less than what the employer was planning to pay.

Employer - based insurance still provides the bedrock in Romney's vision, and anybody who has a choice between employer insurance or private insurance would be wise to choose the former — we've discussed elsewhere how the negotiating strength of large employers offers a lot more protection than being on yEmployer - based insurance still provides the bedrock in Romney's vision, and anybody who has a choice between employer insurance or private insurance would be wise to choose the former — we've discussed elsewhere how the negotiating strength of large employers offers a lot more protection than being on yemployer insurance or private insurance would be wise to choose the former — we've discussed elsewhere how the negotiating strength of large employers offers a lot more protection than being on your own.

Immigrants who avoid ICE face the possibility of exploitation by employers: A 2008 survey from the National Employment Law Project found that 51 % of all undocumented workers in New York City were underpaid by more than $ 1 per hour, and 47 % said they were required to work after sustaining an injury on the job.

«It looks like the temporary foreign worker program in many cases is serving as an escape valve for many employers,» who resort to imported labour rather than raise wages to attract Canadian candidates, he says.

Millennials, who make up more than one - third of the workforce today, value innovation over anything else when it comes to choosing an employer.

Theoretically, it's good for small business: The Wall Street Journal reports that Giuliani hopes at least 13 million people will trade their employer - based insurance for a private plan, bringing the number of Americans who buy their own policies to more than 30 million.

Moreover, it's common sense that one employer and employee response to rising healthcare costs would be turning to plans in which the lofty deductible offsets the exorbitant premiums — especially among younger employees who, generally speaking, need medical services a lot less than their older coworkers.

Employees who changed jobs earned about 1 % more year - over-year than those who stayed with the same employer.

Under federal wage law, employers who pay the tipped minimum wage, which is lower than the standard minimum wage of $ 7.25 per hour, can't pool and share tips with non-tipped workers.

People who enrolled in individual health insurance plans after 2014 were less healthy and used more healthcare in 2014 and 2015 than those who were already enrolled in individual plans and those who receive insurance through their employers, according to a Blue Cross Blue Shield Association report.

President Obama announced tax cuts for small businesses that hire new workers or raise current workers» wages, and a special tax credit of $ 4,000 for employers that hire people who have been out of work for more than six months.

That's 49 million more employees than those who left their current employers in 2012.

And, considering that nearly half of employers (44 percent) studied (in a 2015 Careerbuilder survey of more than 2,000 U.S. hiring and HR managers) said they would think twice before moving an employee who gossips up the ranks, such office chitchat does more harm than good, right?

In fact, more employers with 50 or more full - time equivalent workers who offer coverage say they shifted or plan to shift workers» hours from part - time to full - time status to make them eligible for health benefits (7 %) than say they shifted or plan to shift workers from full - time to part - time status to make them ineligible (2 %).

The IRA is a pre-tax retirement vehicle available to most people who work for an employer and make less than $ 72,000 a year.

The deduction creates a huge loophole for rich people, who could incorporate as sole proprietorships and «contract» with their employers so their income is counted as pass - through income rather than wages.

The 25 percent bracket creates a huge loophole for rich people, who could incorporate as sole proprietorships and «contract» with their employers so their income is pass - through income rather than wages.

Second, data going back more than 20 years evidence that while 50 percent of Americans don't have access to any retirement plan, more than 50 percent of employees who participate in an ESOP have access to a second retirement plan through their employer — usually a 401 (k).

Although baby boomers are 2x as likely as millennials to report having experienced a layoff or termination in their careers, millennials are 22 % more likely than baby boomers to develop a negative perception of the employers who let them go.

The deduction creates a huge loophole for rich people, who could incorporate as sole proprietorships and «contract» with their employers so their income is pass - through income rather than wages.

The changes wrought by the proposed legislation will have a much bigger effect on some groups — especially those who get insurance through their employers and those on Medicaid — than estimated by recent analysis from independent healthcare policy experts such as the Brookings Institution and credit rating agency S&P Global Ratings

Horn said that voluntary paid family leave is the better option because it allows employers, who «are closer to their employees than the government is,» to create programs that work for them.

Typically, any employee who has earned more than $ 5,000 in two preceding years is eligible to join the plan, but employers can also design a plan that's open to employees who have earned less than $ 5,000.

In addition, full deductibility of a contribution is available for working or nonworking spouses who are not covered by an employer - sponsored plan and whose MAGI is less than $ 186,000 for 2017, with partial deductibility for MAGI up to $ 196,000.

As yet, however, we have received no response from the employer, who seems to be far more interested in slashing benefits than in delivering quality public services to Canadians.

Many of the best job candidates look for employers who do more than give lip service to the idea of flexible work and work - life balance for their team members.

To those in the West who have heard of it, this annual 24 - hour sale, held on an unusual Chinese holiday called Singles Day and hosted by ecommerce giant Alibaba Group (my employer), is a source of curiosity if for no other reason than its sheer scale.

Job applicants who mentioned any form of faith affiliation on their resumes were 26 % less likely to be contacted by employers than candidates who didn't, according to the study conducted by sociologists at the University of Connecticut.

For all the losers who write on this blog while at work, you are stealing from your employers... time that you should be working than babbling on this blog.

The blessings she counts include employer - provided health insurance for her children, which makes her better off than 41 million Americans who don't have health insurance.

It isn't just the poor and / or homeless harmed in this ObamaCare nightmare, it is anyone earning more than $ 47,000 who is self - employed or does not have employer provided insurance.

But there was even an effort in that legislation that was being proposed by the government to ensure that we would see coercive powers used against workers rather than used against employers who were intentionally underpaying those workers or other workers in the labour market.

Under the law, an employer may take a credit against its minimum wage obligation and pay a reduced minimum wage to certain «tipped employees» (i.e. individuals who have regular customer interaction and receive more than $ 30 dollars per month in tips).

To put it another way, there are probably thousands of Americans who are terminated from their jobs every day, and they don't have to be convicted of a felony before their employer is allowed to do it, so why does an NFL player somehow have extra rights pertaining to job security than the rest of us do?

Hangeland is into his sixth season at Craven Cottage and is a player who Fulham greatly rely upon at the back but if the American born central defender feels that QPR want him more than his current employers then perhaps a short move to Loftus Road could be a distinct possibility.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...