Sentences with phrase «than your god because»

Yes, I am much better than your god because I don't think it is fair to torture people for eternity and I don't think it's fair to call such a god «good.».

Not exact matches

«We take this step because we know, that in solving the many, many problems and our great challenges, faith is more powerful than government and nothing is more powerful than God,» Trump said.

«We take this step because we know that, in solving the many, many problems and our great challenges, faith is more powerful than government and nothing is more powerful than God,» Trump said at a Rose Garden ceremony.

And there is a better chance fairies exist than your god (assuming you are describing the judeo - christina god; always have to ask because there have been thousands throughout humanity).

It means God is not dependent on a nature other than himself, because he is identical with his own nature.

Please, are the gods so stupid that just because an alive person claims a dead one is now a different religion said god would have to throw them out of their old religion heaven and send them to the other heaven??? Really, some of you are more obsessed with dead people than the ones living.

Because God's purpose for the path often has more to do with the process — growing our faith, making us more dependent on him, and more loving / forgiving towards ourselves and each other — than the actual destination.

i need to be willing to form and reform and unform my concept of God because if i do nt, then i have an idol more than a true God.

Those explanations provide a lot more empirical evidence than, «It just is,» or «Because the book of God says so.»

Jesus Christ was indeed higher (had a higher rank) than his followers simply because he was the Son of God.

In other words, a god that instills fear, rather than love is not worth worshipping because even my hell bound soul should be of exponential value to god, despite the fact my soul is just one of billions.

This suicide is unforgivable because you can not repent for it malarkey seems to place more emphasis on a technicallity than on God's reason for sending his son.

Other than the sights of «god» on a piece of toast or otherwise, while it'd be great for something when life ends, there just isn't, other than the hope while one is living, because once dead, you never knew you were alive...

With faith in your heart, you do not need to pursue proof or empirical evidence through human means which you will never find because God Is Spirit, thus, so much greater than mortal men which He created who have limited knowledge.

Misery, sorrow, poverty, loneliness, helplessness, and guilt mean something different in the eyes of God than according to human judgment; that God turns toward the very places from which humans turn away; that Christ was born in a stable because there was no room for him in the inn — a prisoner grasps this better than others.

I had a hard time loving because of pain and hurt in my life... from none other than my family... but I asked God to allow me to see them through his eyes... that helped me pick up the pieces... hand them to Jesus and allow him to lead me and guide my way to him... that is the only hope of life we have.

You are completely right, I jumped to conclusion because I could almost hear the «if god didn't do it than who did?»

Many people do not marry in a church, even more (billions) do not celebrate the birth of Jesus, probably even more do not cry out to any gods, or may to other gods other than (yours), and many people consider life elsewhere in the universe because science and reason points to that possibility.

But, we've got more missionaries coming into America from Korea and all other parts of the world because they're seeing more of God in their own country than they are here.

Because of the sinfulness of the world at that time, and because the pagan religions did much more harm than good, it was necessary for some tribes of peoples to be destroyed by the Israelites at the command Because of the sinfulness of the world at that time, and because the pagan religions did much more harm than good, it was necessary for some tribes of peoples to be destroyed by the Israelites at the command because the pagan religions did much more harm than good, it was necessary for some tribes of peoples to be destroyed by the Israelites at the command of God.

But, jews think they are better than everyone else because they are the chosen ones — better ones, not because they were chosen to carry the word of God.

My God will always be better than your God, because of the simple fact he's my God, logical right?

«The November 2002 Samaritan's Purse (Canada) Newsletter quotes Franklin Graham: «I believe God has blessed this program because it is about more than Christmas presents. . .

@ smrtaz — No, science plainly called «idolatry» in the «bible», because it advocates actually getting the answers, rather than blindly repeating «because «god» did it».

Maybe it's because God is a bit bigger than you and His ways are not like our ways.

I am proud to say I believe in God, I did have the choice to belive or not to believe just as anyone else does, just because I choose to believe in something doesn't mean I have been brainwashed, I could say the same thing about you, but I won't, people can believe what they want to believe, I don't need anyone telling me what to believe, if I believe is because I have seen what He has done in my life and in other lives too, and that's more than enough for me to believe in Him.

Colin forgot # 11 — Thou Shalt listen to colin's 10 because he is so much smarter than God or any of his people who wrote the original 10 down.

According the the revered Theologan Calvin, women are»... more guilty than the man, because she was seduced by Satan, and so diverted her husband from obedience to God that she was an instrument of death leading all to perdition.

Oh, and for the record, I would never make the argument that I'm smarter than a theist solely because I refuse to believe in god.

20 For the invisible things of him since the creation of the world are clearly seen, being perceived through the things that are made, even his everlasting power and divinity; that they may be without excuse: 21 because that, knowing God, they glorified him not as God, neither gave thanks; but became vain in their reasonings, and their senseless heart was darkened.22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God for the likeness of an image of corruptible man, and of birds, and four - footed beasts, and creeping things.24 Wherefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts unto uncleanness, that their bodies should be dishonored among themselves: 25 for that they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever.

I can no more say this supports a God of Love than a God of Wrath because it depends on one's interpretation.

And to say that Biblical teachings are invalid because there are other similar beliefs that have older known written sources invalidates the Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that for certain Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and apostles.

It's fascinating to hear that God's laws were given as a DEMONSTRATION rather than because they are LOGICAL or JUST.

But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels, now crowned with glory and honor because he suffered death, so that by the grace of God he might taste death for everyone.

That is your first mistake because you can not provide me with a reasonable explanation for a divine creators existence) and the fact that we exist is not anymore a reason for the proof of the existence of an anthropomorphic god than it proves the existence of, in Richard Dawkins terms, the flying spaghetti monste.

I point this out because even if JPII has been beatified sooner and may be canonized sooner than people in the past, it doesn't mean that he actually becomes a saint sooner, or gets any sort of «preferential treatment» from God.

But interpreting providence in light of historical specifics leads to nothing but problems, because one will end up with a God who cares for some people (or peoples) more than others.

Do you honestly think you no better than God, because every time you tell someone make a declarative statement and tell someone how they should live, you are doing his job for him and that makes God VERY VERY ANGRY.

Like everyone else, they have chosen to embrace a God narrative because they like it better than the alternative.

This is why Gods love is supreme and infinite for all no less no more because there is nothing less abut Gods love and there can be nothing greater than Gods agape type love

Traditional theism denied that there are any necessary because uncreated principles governing the interrelations among worldly actualities, and hence God's relations with them, other than strictly logical principles.

This is because God is nothing other than an extension of Ego.

If we love God, then it does not take much for us to say yes because it is so much more fun in living with God than floating out there in the vast universe with no love for eternity.

Your belief in God is based on nothing more than a simple desire to believe a comforting narrative because the alternative is to believe harsh realities about your existence.

Are you open - minded enough to consider the possibility that there is no God and that you've just been convincing yourself of something that isn't true because it's more comforting than the alternative?

Not to be a jerk or anything, but if it were the other way around, and a man lost his job running an athiest group, because he found God, Christians would more than likely aid him, and athiests would accuse those helping him, of only doing so for the medias attention.

Uncle David: If there are more God - believers in the population, and more of them are attracted to AA because of their belief in the higher power in the first place... it does not necessarily follow that AA's approach is more successful than any other program because of sheer numbers.

If people think that they can get more of Gods love then we can boast about it by saying he loves me more than you because I'm more obedient to Him than you.

The concept of once saved always saved takes a bit to get your head around but Gods grace is greater than our sin and greater than our good works it just takes faith in Jesus Christ to recieve Gods grace.In saying that to continue to sin as a christian is like playing with fire you will be burnt.Paul talks of the sexual immorality in corinthian church of the son and father that were sleeping with the same wife they were excommunicated from the church the members were not allowed to even eat with them until they repented.There are consequences for our actions.The other side to this is that if you continue to sin as a christian you are not walking by faith but walking by the flesh and are really backsliding.In the backslidden state you also become powerless and open to attack by satan as long as we walk in the flesh he can influence us to get worse not better.If we are walking in Christ satan may still try to tempt us but we are empowered by the holy spirit and overcome him and our faith increases.Both are saved by grace but one is powerless because of sin versus saved but an overcomer having been set free from sin i think this is what Paul was trying to explain.It is better to be an overcomer than overcome by sin.brentnz

God does not delight in the marriage of two 25 - year - olds more than in the marriage of two 65 - year - olds simply because the younger couple may have a longer time together.