Critics say Flew went senile and was bamboozled into lending his name to a book ghostwritten by an apologist, uncritically describing recent weak
theistic arguments like the «fine tuning» argument.
Not exact matches
Yet, inasmuch as they regard all
arguments from
theistic premises as illegitimate, the word «secular» seems to fit
like a glove, one of its principal meanings (according to the Oxford English Dictionary) being «non-ecclesiastical, non-religious, or non-sacred.»
Like the rest of his philosophy, then, Hartshorne's
theistic arguments, aside from the ontological
argument, are experientially rooted.