Sentences with phrase «them money then»

Making money then becomes an easy proposition.»

For those of you who are thinking about hopping in this crazy game and you want to do it just for the money then let me pose a few questions to you.

That money then gets poured back into creating video content, which in turn cements Vice's hold on the market.

If we don't have stable money then whatever else we do we won't really be able to achieve broader economic prosperity.

Which will now be harder, because paying for Solar City in stock — and hence diluting existing shareholders substantially — mere weeks after a big equity offering will make investors to whom Musk will have to sell stock in the future to meet his voracious needs for money think twice: will he take their money then dilute them again a few weeks or months later?

This is a very heated subject, yup, I DO N'T believe in value investing nor apply its principles as the main factor to decide which stock I will buy and I will tell you why in this post, but if you want to cut to the chase, if you want to make money then you need to think outside the box.

If something isn't right with your money then make the necessary changes to fix it.

Where did the money then go?

This is a COMPLETE SCAM company who will take your money then ignore you.

Many believe that because they don't have what would be considered a lot of money then they simply have to wait.

If you are seriously against giving record labels your money then please come to the band's shows and buy our CD from us at the shows.

If your purpose is money then your god is money.

Just goes to show that if you are going to steal peoples money then do it legally.

They think, «If that church has nothing better to do with its money then send me junk mail, I'm sure not going to attend there and give them my money!»

I mean didn't Jesus talked way more about our addiction to money then about sexuality?

Trying to make ends meet Trying to find some money then you die.

The catholic church seems more in the business of making money then in «saving souls», like most mega-churches.

if they were after money then they have gotten what they deserve and everyone else is left to wonder.

Sow into the right local Church and the right Church / Ministry Organizations where the Holy Spirit leads you to because they are more resposible with money then the government, and above all, God will bless you for your giving!!!

They probably made a lot of money then, and they sure made a lot of money this time around.

If you only treated and employed catholics and didn't receive government money then I say do what ever floats your boat.

If you're on a budget this is a dish that will cost you less time and money then take out fried rice would.

At the end of the day if he chooses to leave and we end up getting good money then I can't see anyway that can persuade him to stay, but I expect Wenger to what ever he can to keep him at Arsenal.

If Alexis won't sign a contract with us then it's better to sell him to Bayern for less money then City.

Girls still out there making more money then all of us... if you hating Ronda maybe it's cause you hating your own slave life?

If Wenger really cares about not wasting Arsenal's money then why hasn't he asked for a 50 % wage cut???

So it would be funny if BB let his star QB go when his former backup is making even more money then Brady in San Fran.

I think if he started getting Conor money then there might be cause for concerned.

The problem with your arguments is that if it was just about spending money then there's no way Spurs could compete.

You arent following the Money then.

That's a LOT less guaranteed money then even I thought he'd get.

So pissed they re-signed Kilgore for starter money then traded him.

So pissed they re-signed Kilgore for starter money then traded him to the Dolphins for nothing and the Dolphins took 100 % of the costs of the contract that I was pissed about of the player I was pissed about re-signing.

I say give him the same contract, if he wants more money then he has to go.

All Premier League teams have more money then they ever dreamed of, so it's going be hard to coax players away, as even with the added millions from the TV deals, Arsenal and Arsene seem to be sticking to their budget of the past 3 years

Wenger said yesterday that he was sorry he didn't spend # 55mil on Rob Holding, interesting comment, if he thinks Rob Holding is worth a lot of money then why did he haggle with Bolton and only offer them # 750k?

Okay, if wenger insists that Leicester won the league without spending money then the reason for their success would suggest it was down to their managers tactics and motivation!

We had the money then, and the positions needed filling then.

Also if Alexis and Ozil are not signing due to ambition concerns rather than money then how is Wenger going to resolve that?

If he was all about the money then let's face it — it would not have cost him any where near that to get the team to where it is now in this season.

So to re-cap, if AFC change the board, get new ownership, change the business model, change the manager (or give him an updated training manual), reduce the ticket prices, don't sell any players who want to leave, only buy or sell players sanctioned by the fans, spend # 65 - 85M this window, stop negotiating on transfer fees but just hand over the money then we will win the PL and UCL on a regular basis and this particular supporter will be happy.

To announce such heap of money then say «by the way guys there are just two players in the world we can't buy: Ronaldo and Messi», still suggests the status quo remains!

If you pay that amount of money then people have to live with the fact that not everybody can be the boss.

For what he's achieved he isn't asking for anything extreme so pay him what he deserves, let him fight for TJ's belt and then if he doesn't do what he said he would do all along which is move up and fight whoever the champ is for the right money then you can say he's ducking, don't try to force his hand at every turn and make out he's the unreasonable one

if we have money then we should sign someone like Cavani.

We know he has been offered more money then we can compete with from over there and if they do have money to throw around then who can see Gazidis turning down a big money transfer?

If we get good money then yes we should accept, but if not, no harm in keeping him.

If it's not about money then give them what they want!

If it's for the money then i don't care because i pay way too much to support a club that is mediocre for its status.

The UFC makes more money then other promotions and it pays more money than other promotions.