Sentences with phrase «then act that way»

The most important thing any adult in schools can do is to envision students as partners, and then act that way.

Not exact matches

«If you believe you're not going to be successful then you won't be because you're not going to act that way,» he advises.

Harvard Law professor Michael Sandel has been crusading for all of us to seriously think (and then act if so inclined) on the controversial ways that money has influenced us.

With a then two - year - old, and another child on the way, an MBA from Alberta's Athabasca University — which mixes in - residence and online components — would be a delicate balancing act between the books and the slopes.

Then there were the random acts of cruelty, such as an employee who went out of her way to get someone fired, she recalls.

As a founder who also bootstrapped my way, it has acted as an excellent reminder that if your product is helping people, then it is worth it to stay the course.

If you have encountered an act of passive aggression, then you already know that it's never the best way to resolve a conflict.

You'll then know where your traffic is coming from and why people act the way they do on your site.

Although strong bipartisan support has been voiced for the JOBS Act amendments, Aguilar's negative sentiment echoes that of Senator Carl Levin (D - MI) who said, «It's as if the SEC is jumping out of an airplane today, and then proposing to check the safety of its parachute on the way down.»

If the CPI would go out of the expected ranges, then the ECB would have to act in one way or another.

But that would require a fundamental change to the Elections Act — eliminating the requirement of a party leader's endorsement to run as a party's candidate, then fashioning a more coherent rule — and a change in the ways our political parties do business.

It's silly) And since the belief and the book can be used to justify evil actions, then it's really about how YOU interpret the belief, because others can interpret it in a completely different way and act «immoral» by their exegesis.

If the cost of addressing these kind of issues is to be wrongly perceived as having misunderstood, as acting in a way that is consistent with a hindrance to women (as in this instance by you) rather than what is actually happening — a combination of life experience and informed opinion acting in a way that is conducive to equality, dignity and empowerment for women then this is a price I am willing to pay for the sake of women's well being.

Your going to end up sick if you keep letting it eat away at you so much, and quit being a hypocrite by accusing others for not acting Christian and then turn around and talk against them the way you do.

But, in my experience, sometimes the best way to keep communication healthy and open is to go to bed angry and then talk about it the next morning when you've had enough sleep to know that leaving the milk out in the car probably wasn't a veiled act of aggression meant to symbolize every problem in the relationship, but rather just the sort of mistake anyone would make while distracted by a fascinating story on NPR.

I believe, however, that churches should act like they pay taxes, and then take that «tax money» and use it in tangible ways for the good of the community.

If I was living on the wrong path leading to death with all the dumb things I was doing like listening to bad music, goofing around in class, cussing, acting like I was a gangster, wanting to try drugs, being suicidal and being around with close friends that are doing the bad then he can change you too because, I tell you that if you think that your life will go for the worst if you accept them then you're wrong because, if you have faith in him and you accept him as your savior and follow his ways then he has your road all planned out, he's going to give you such blessings and a happiness and love that compares to none others.

That horrible person WAS NOT a Christian... # 1 way to tell if a person is a Christian... IS THAT WHAT JESUS CHRIST WOULD HAVE DONE?????? The answer to that question is «HECK NO»!!!!!!! If you want to know what a true Christian is then look to the person we follow... those of us who are following in his footsteps and doing what he said to do «Love your neighbor» (that includes all neighbors even if they don't look, act, or think like you).

Islam at the beginning held the sword only when it was necessary to survive the wars launched against it by the Pagans of Mecca beside the Persians who then were worshipping fire... Any way remember that we never came closer to the West until the launched their first attacks against Muslims by the crusaders that came from the west towards Jerusalem... Such acts has drove Islam to adopt the policy that says «Attack is the best means of defense» to push the crusaders further back.

If you, as I, do not accept any of these ways of rejecting much of Scripture, then you can reasonably conclude that violence and even killing itself is not sinful when used to prevent evil acts and punish evil natures.

I always love the line «don't push your beliefs down my throat» which If you beleive that to be a way I person to act is then itself a belief you are pushing thus making the the belief useless.

And if he chose to drown all of humanity, including infants and children, except 8 people, though he apparently didn't realize at the time that his mass slaughter would not change humanity's ways, then, in your eyes, that is a moral act.

The second soil represents those who heard, received, and believed the Word, and initially began to act upon it, but then temptation to sin caused them to go back to their old way of living.

W. Widick Schroeder observes that if coercion is defined as «the capacity to act in ways violating others,» then «persuasion and coercion interplay in any human community» (PPT 70).

If the point of religion is to bring peace and guide a culture toward certain specific behaviors, primarily for order and the preservation of the good qualities of society, then how can one say that one religion is better than another or that a «religion-less» person who STILL acts the SAME way (i.e. does right unto their neighbors, lives according to the thing the bible suggests) but is more tolerant is not as high quality a citizen as another who is associated with a Major League Religious Team?

If we want to see and understand those forces as they truly are, then we must look not to reason (which acts as a distorting lens), but to our more immediate, primordial ways of knowing, that is, aesthetic intuition (the divine inspiration of the artist) and action.

I was acting against my better judgment then, but I live naturally now with way fewer regrets.

Sartre says that the soldier's past «does not in any way act deterministically; but once the past «soldier of the Empire» has been chosen, then the conduct of the for - itself realizes this past.

It becomes even worse when the servants, slaves, or subjects come to feel and to act as if this is the way things must be; then they have given up their human dignity and have denied the human potentiality that is properly theirs.

If I am to share of what has happened to me in a difficult situation and be vulnerable about that and someone is to act in the same or similar way with me then I would say its not an issue with me being thin skinned, I think the issue is with them about their insensitivity in their conduct.

Christian biopolitics, then, attempts to provide a framework for thinking and acting, a way of looking at problems and of working toward solutions.

If what is demanded of me by high moral principles also leads to my deliverance in a situation where not to act in accordance with these ethical demands or to continue in my same ways of acting leads to my destruction, then there are possibilities for basic transformations of my ideas, attitudes, and goals.

This is thus a persistent pattern for Yahweh: order one group of humans to harm a second group of humans, then take away the free will of the second ground and force them to act in a way that ensures conflict can occur.

But if that's so, he notes, then it should govern the way Christians think about same - sex sexual activity as well, and thus he concludes: «When those with homosexual orientation act on their desires in a loving, committed relationship, [they] are not, as far as I can see, violating the love command.»

To put it another way, if all God had to do was forgive, then the birth, teachings, the ministry, the betrayel, the trial, the beatings, humiliation, and crucifiction, the sacrifice of His Son, Himself, was a pointless act, a token gesture at best.

That is why he and his community, The Simple Way, sought out the worst and most crime - filled area of Philadelphia, and then sought to redeem and transform it with acts of love, mercy, and kindness.

And when God acts in this way, these moments are associated with such joy that no one could possibly understand unless they've at some time committed wholeheartedly to an idealistic dream of making something happen, getting all embroiled and churned up by the process and then being released at the other end.

Then the search for ways of acting that would please the gods had indeed been baffling, but now a moral puzzle was added to man's bewilderment.

According to Dennett, these Martian anthropologists would then discover that human behavior in fact displays no such intersubjectivity of its own either: Everything the Martians see in the way humans act can be explained by the standard norms of their science, and since they are missing that extra mental stuff, why assume humans have it either?

If God does not act at this level «to design the universe in a purposeful way,» he says, then «random chance was extremely lucky, because the outcome is there to see.»

No, the only thing we can do is read and learn and discuss the first three acts, and then, based our understanding of those three acts, the plot structure up that point, the way the characters act, and how we think the conflict might resolve, improvise the fourth act to the best of our ability.

«In Christian theology, such phrases regularly act as «portable stories» — that is, ways of packing up longer narratives about God, Jesus, the church and the world, folding them away into convenient suitcases, and then carrying them about with us.»

(3) In such persons, the free, effective Adult takes information from the Child, the Parent, and from external reality, and then makes a decision to act in a way that will result in movement toward constructive goals.

If the answer to the first question is no, then we may say that no judgment of the form, «I ought to act in a certain way,» is warranted.

If you know of a way to calculate the probability of bible god according to mathematics and physical laws in a way that explains how sub-atomic particles act, then science will run those numbers...

My favorite part of the BuyBull is when gawd gives man free will and then k * lls everyone with a fl ** d for not acting the way he wants.

If we are persuaded that there may be a third category of sexual vocation, then the homosexual may further ask: How is my homosexuality to be acted out in such a way as to contribute to God's purposes for me and my fellow human beings?

My Favorite part of the BuyBull is when Gawd gives people Free Will and then kills everyone with a flood for not acting the way he wants.

I believed that if I acted the right way, lived a certain way and did enough for God, then my life would turn out the way I wanted it to and He would clear the path for me on Easy Street.

Fair enough Kos could've been sent off, but if we weren't down to 9 men then he wouldn't be acting in such a way anyway.