Bible Scholars claim «
argumentum ad vercundiam» with the Bible, knowing full well that one passage is consider in errant,
then the whole text becomes in question.
Then you'd have to decide whether you want to go with a plan that seems to have a good reason behind it, but constitutes
argumentum ad ignoratiam, or tell yourself that
argumentum ad ignoratiam is always a logical fallacy, and therefore stubbornly continue crossing against the light.