Sentences with phrase «then assign a risk»

Based upon this average, you are then assigned a risk group.

Life insurance companies review applications and then assign a Risk Class, which is what determines how much the coverage will cost.

You're then assigned a risk class such as Preferred Plus, Preferred, Standard Plus, Standard, or Substandard.

Not exact matches

«Once you've identified your risks, you can then decide whether it is most appropriate to eliminate the internal weakness by assigning company resources to fix the problems, or reduce the external threat by abandoning the threatened area of business and meeting it after strengthening your business,» Bauer said.

These three values were then averaged and each stock was assigned a risk - adjusted return ranking.

So I suppose, considering what you and someone above said about the meter not catching stuff, my question would be (well two questions) why they follow up with someone who DOES have gestational diabetes by assigning a meter, and then whether, if the person was able to avoid huge insulin peaks by eating well and such that the meter showed them not going over their established (by the doctor that is) threshold, would that mean that they were effectively mitigating the risks?

The researchers assigned risk categories to each of the operations performed in the data pool, including colorectal and liver resections, and then compared 30 - day postsurgical outcomes among patients within similar risk groups.

The second part of that advice might seem obvious and unnecessary, but we all know those students who fail to carefully read the question or prompt and then too quickly write about a vaguely related topic; or those who believe essays are graded on word count and prefer to write a lot about a topic they know well — or everything they know about a variety of topics — rather than risk writing too little about a less familiar, though assigned, topic.

These three values were then averaged and each stock was assigned a risk - adjusted return ranking.

First, what the regular static passively - managed asset allocation models are in a nutshell: 17 asset classes are chosen, their weightings are assigned (based on five investor risk temperament levels), and then they're funded using mutual funds.

Each of the characteristics then is assigned a weight based on how strong a predictor it is of who would be a good risk.

Financial institutions use this score to determine what kind of risk you are; foremost determining whether or not to grant approval and then what kind of rates to assign you.

Then, they assign a value to each of the characteristics, the incidence of this value depends on the relevance that it has as a predictor element for the evaluation of the level of risk of a candidate.

If we are assigning a theoretical risk of $ 8 to this trade and we are also saying one trade is 1 % of our total risk capital, then the total risk capital must be $ 8 x 100 = $ 800.

Then you have a scenario where the upside and downside are essentially equal and even if you assign a 60 % probablility to the upside the risk / return tradeoff isn't there.

Some breeders feel that all dogs with unknown carrier risk should be assigned the average risk of the breeding population; i.e., if it is estimated that 12 % of the population are carriers, then anyone without computable risk will be assigned a risk of 12 %.

They can then be assigned to multiple matters with synchronized review tags to reduce review costs and the risk of inconsistent coding.

So for example, if Farmers Auto Insurance has 14 % of the total auto insurance market in Oklahoma, then Farmers must cover 14 % of the high risk drivers assigned through the OK AIP.

The insurance company essentially determines how much of a risk you would be to insure and then assigns accordingly.

An underwriter will then assess your «risk» level and give you a rate class assigned to your specific risk.

So for example, if GEICO has 12 % of South Dakota's total auto insurance market, then GIECO will be assigned 12 % of the high risk drivers by the South Dakota AIP.

If life insurance companies didn't assign risk classes, then healthy individuals would pay the same price as their less healthy counterparts.

If your assigned insurer discovers that you've omitted or misrepresented information that is important to assessing you as a risk — like accidents, DUIs, speeding tickets, etc. — then they may decide you are acting in bad faith.

Basically what happens when you apply for a policy is the underwriter reviews your case and decides what the risk is for covering you for a specific period and then they assign a monetary value.

So, for example, if Farmers Union has 10 % of the total auto insurance market in Montana, then Farmers Union will be assigned to cover 10 % of the high risk drivers in Montana.

If you need to look into assigned risk coverage then you can talk to an insurance agent or contact your local department of motor vehicles for more information.

So if for example, GIECO covers 5 % of all Vermont drivers, then GEICO will be assigned 5 % of the high risk drivers in the state.

The deal is that if an insurer wants to do ANY auto insurance business in Vermont, then that insurer must agree to cover a share of high risk drivers when they are assigned.

Your underwriter will then assign you with a «risk» class the will ultimately determine the cost of your life insurance policy.