Since
then atmospheric observations show the levels have been dropping, and are now close to the pre-industrial proportions.
Not exact matches
The resulting 3D simulations are
then sampled at the locations of OCO - 2
observations to determine the error in the forward model of
atmospheric variations.
Note that he used the past in his sentence «satellite data showed no warming» and
then he goes on «The report showed that selective corrections to the
atmospheric data could lead to some warming, thus reducing the conflict between
observations and models descriptions of what greenhouse warming should look like.»
If the
observation that CO2 lags temperature by 800 years is accurate,
then debating short term variations of
atmospheric CO2 when compared to short term temperature variations of that atmosphere seems pointless.
Then you face a choice of doing this with fixed present - day conditions - where you have the best available
observations of clouds,
atmospheric circulation, etc - or with fixed conditions at 1860 - where most of the
observations are missing.