If the common issues were decided against Thomson,
then behaviour modification would be achieved.
Not exact matches
Then of course there was «The Hartwell Paper» — with some real heavyweights behind it: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27939/ Suggesting that the
modification of «consumer
behaviour by settling a carbon price» was necessary to achieve «radical decarbonisation» and should be «priced as high as is politically acceptable».
If this model presents some unrealistically high wind velocities (due to some unanticipated effect)
then this
behaviour can readily be suppressed with only minor
modifications.