Sentences with phrase «then claim the action»

When the insured sues, insurers then claim the action is statute barred — a position our courts have accepted in a number of cases.

Not exact matches

You spend all your time breaking apart what YOU deem inappropriate (thinking / believing, actions / output), then turn around, change Jesus» terminology and claim it as your own.

Well it is true that some people seek sorcerers to implement Jinn that are satanic demons into mankind or his house or his business to finish him or make his life miserable or to stop flow of his business income... In such case it is either you are religious enough and say your prayers often then it becomes hard for this to harm you or otherwise you need to find some one who practice exorcism to remove this evil... But many are just pretending to be good at it and help you not but squeeze money out of you with tales and stories... There is another type of possessions and that is not through a sorcerer but directly by coincidence what man is at his weakest moments and those weakest moments for a possessions are when you come through a great fear or when cry or laugh loudly in hysteria, or during a certain moment of mating... or even when sneezing loudly... That's why there are prayers to be said on daily basis to guard you from such things and specially if passing haunted places such as deserted houses but most evil ones are residents of public toilets and market places... Some of them even would claim that you have made a wrong action by which you have killed a dear one to them and for that they have possessed you and that is mostly night time such as throwing a cigaret butt to a dark place or stepping killing an insect or even an animal at night which could have been one of them or possessed by one of them... So this is true thing happening to many who suffer unexplainable illnesses or sufferings which could look like mental illness that comes and goes as pleased...

If we claim to have the truth and to represent a loving God, then our actions and words must contain an overabundance of love and mercy.

They do, however, also argue that if faith came from ourselves, or was in any way something we do instead of God doing for us, then it is in some way meritorious, and since that does not jive with their understanding of total depravity, then they must claim that saving faith must only be from God, and not a response or action of any sort on our part.

Why am convinced that who ever produced them needed to market them and for that purpose might have arranged the pulling of few strings and actions until it was officially employed... that is common in America... spray the virus then claim to have the cure ready in big quant - i - ties... what a marketing skills those are...!?

then you have no basis for anything else you'd do or claim... including supposed definitions of compassion or «compassionate» actions.

But again, if Jesus claims to reveal God to us (John 1:14, 18; 14:9 - 11; 2 Cor 4:4; Php 2:6; Col 1:15; Heb 1:2 - 3), then why would we ever reject the perfect revelation of God in Jesus Christ as the lens by which we understand the actions of God in the Old Testament?

... you can claim free will and by so cover all of the human actions done to the world but how can say that god is real and controls nature when nature has killed more purely innocent lives then anything in history ever... if god was just and comp@ssinate why send the wave that killed 300 thousand, why create the plague that killed nearly 75 million in the middle ages when nearly everyone was a VERY devout believer....

If god could cause the entire community (or anyone) to support or appose any actions, then how can Christians claim free will?

For me I do believe in the Sacraments and the role they play in Salvation - Jesus did change wine into this blood and the bread into his body during the last supper and told believers to do this in his memory and he did foreshadow what would happen on the Cross he gave up his life so we maybe could be saved, because not all who profess Christ is Lord or believe in God will be saved, there are many people who claim they can abuse, sleep around, steal, cheat and that they'll still go to heave because 1 day they said the sinner's prayer, actions speak louder then words.

If you are an athiest and use the term myth in this derogatory (albeit common) way AND you claim to have free will, to be responsible for your actions, to have self - awareness or you claim to be married to or otherwise in a relationship with your true love, then you are a hypocrit.

If it turns out that we are more than rational beings with interests, and that we make claims (sometimes angrily) based on honor and the need for recognition, then consent and deliberation that ignores more poignant spurs to action than mere interest will often fall short.

So atheists then follow suit, duplicating an action which they claim offends them?

If somebody wants to claim that god designed the process or instigated the process or used a spell to enact the process, then those are different arguments as they posit an idea or action outside of the process itself.

I'm sorry but if you want to claim that religion contributed to the healing after 9/11 happened then you need to also accept the FACT that its what fueled the actions of those hijackers.

If your claim were true, then suicide attacks would be ok because they are only taking such action because of their faith.

... you can claim free will and by so cover all of the human actions done to the world but how can say that god is real and controls nature when nature has killed more purely innocent lives then anything in history ever... if god was just and comp@ssinate why send the tsunami that killed 300 thousand, why create the plague that killed nearly 75 million in the middle ages when nearly everyone was a VERY devout believer....

Since then, TMW have claimed the Red Devils sent scouts to watch Dybala in action for Juventus in the recent Champions League win against Tottenham at Wembley, during which he scored the winning goal.

Her big brother, who claims to be far too old for lunch box notes, even gets in on the action as a surprise guest note - maker now and then.

In 2012, the ASA upheld Baby Milk Action's complaints about a national advertising campaign that claimed SMA is the best formula in a ruling against its then owner, Pfizer Nutrition.

«And as far as any claims of officers being rude or nippy, for lack of a better word, at their post, we'll investigate it, and if it's proven that it's true then we'll take quick action.»

In a lengthy interview on Radio 4's Today programme, former prime minister Tony Blair denied claims he set the UK on an unalterable course to start military action in Iraq following a July 2002 memo to then - US president George W Bush.

He slept at the offices of the Electoral Commission during the collation of the election results, claiming that the EC is manipulating the results in favour of the then ruling NDC government; an action the NDC condemned as undiplomatic.

It then offers a variety of claims about subsequent discriminatory conduct by Lipkin, and the lack of a forceful response by Columbia when Hornig reported those actions.

If we and you do not then resolve the Claim within 30 days after our receipt of your Notice is received, either you or we may commence an arbitration or file a small claims court action to resolve the Claim.

CMSA is perhaps best known for having fired a pregnant teacher in 2010 who was involved in organizing a union at the school, then defending itself against a labor relations board action by claiming it was a private, not a public school.

If Secretary DeVos claims to care about local control, then her actions show otherwise.»

In any case, where a child has disabilities then any academy trust undertaking such a course of action would have to be very cautious to avoid claims under the Equality Act 2010.

Governor Doug Ducey then entered the picture taking a page from Indiana Governor Pence's save - Common - Core playbook where you claim you're against Common Core yet your actions have the exact opposite effect.

If your work is property marked, then an unauthorized user may not claim that he or she was «innocent,» and you may be able to recover a larger award in an infringement action.

If you want to adopt this more militant approach (we're not specifically advocating it, but as it's worked for some, we are giving it as an option) then the following template letter should help, though if your lender refuses you may then need to threaten small claims court action.

Fred got two months into it and then he got a notice from small claims court, one of his creditors was taking legal action against him.

If the prohibition against class actions and other claims brought on behalf of third parties contained above is found to be unenforceable, then all of the preceding language in this Arbitration section will be null and void.

To claim the offer, customer must first click through the ad and then complete the additional actions described.

Back on topic though, they once read out a letter from a listener who claimed to have found a fourth playable character hidden in the game, and by doing a set list of actions and then soft resetting you could access him, and he was meant to be game director Koichi Ishii.

Should you file any arbitration claims, or any administrative or legal actions without first having attempted to resolve the matter by mediation, then you agree that you will not be entitled to recover attorneys» fees, even if you would otherwise be entitled to them.

For the sake of reference, Rockstar's December 2013 Newswire post claims the developer then had «big plans for substantial additions in 2014» where it would continue «Michael, Franklin and Trevor's action, mayhem and unexpected adventures in Southern San Andreas.»

And if you comment on something that «is outside my field of expertise» and are corrected, then repeating the claims and insulting the person correcting you is probably not a wise course of action.

«When you set a specific goal, or say if we go over some threshold the risk will increase dramatically, you are then linking action to a specific scientific claim that can be disputed.

If we try to panic policy makers into action by claiming hypothetical extremes then we risk having the baby thrown out with the bathwater when those extreme scenarios don't appear to be eventuating.

If your basic claim is «the highest quality scientific evidence we have says we must take X action'then you have to throw anyone on your side that does «sloppy work» or makes statements that are only «weakly» supported by «the highest quality science» under the bus.

Then, he declared that he did not want to lead a party not serious about climate action, and questioned any policy that claimed to be cost - neutral.

For instance, if you claim to know there's certain disaster if you don't take action x, then introducing exposing existing uncertainty about that disaster may reduce both risk and cost.

If they do not have sufficient knowledge of those physical causes to predict their actions, then we can hardly be expected to have confidence in their claim that GCMs contain everything needed to forecast global climate 100 years out.

But to justify the need for such action they then feel compelled to make claims of looming climate catastrophe that admit of no scientific uncertainty whatsoever.

Having just seen the Carter op - ed, I note that he doesn't claim that there is no climate change, merely no global warming, and then he warns of global cooling and calls for action to deal with that problem.

You co-opted Hansen's and others targets and say «a credible Plan requires at least two major components: an end point / target, and a series of actions / policies that will lead to the target,» and then claim that more targets, such as sharp demand reduction, are the steps.

And in Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. v. Carrier Sekani Tribal Council, 2010 SCC 43, the Supreme Court of Canada found that «the duty to consult extends to «strategic, higher level decisions» that may have an impact on Aboriginal claims and rights»; however, the court concluded then, «We leave for another day the question of whether government conduct includes legislative action... ``

The commission then terminated his pay and benefits, claiming that the legal action was tantamount to a resignation.