Sentences with phrase «then claim the record»

Not exact matches

Then he went on to state that our job record is the best among the G - 7 countries — a highly misleading claim by any serious measure.

For the record, the then Progressive Conservative government's claim of a surplus just before the NDP came to power is nonsense.

So how do you go from that reasoning to «Since it wasn't accidental then it must have been this ancient male diety named (fill in blank depending on religion) who loves me and knows me and cares for me and wants me to perform rituals that have nothing to do with morality like prayer, not eating certain things, sabaath and many more just because he said so, even though we have no record of him saying anything, just records of humans who wrote things down that they claim he said, but I want to believe it all so badly I will base my beliefs on no other evidence than «it just can't be accident».

Judge Noonan points out that the employee was not required to participate in or even listen to the services; he then recounts the historical record of free exercise claims under the Court's «compelling state interest» standard:

This would repeat through the rest of the NL if no one claims him, and then it would start over again with the White Sox, who have the worst record in the American League.

Its quite unfortunate that Wenger is yet to find and still searching for a better player to add quality to the team at his disposal, my take is, the problem limiting Arsenal as a whole not claiming any major trophy is our high record with injuries and the coach inability to select the right player for the right spot, no genuine back up for some crucial positions, if and only if we can sort the injury issue out and Wenger selecting the right player at the right time and in the right game, then we're good to go.

You can bet if Ronaldo had claimed the «record», then the governing body would be much more willing to examine Chitalu's claims.

Despite spending what was then a world - record transfer fee to bring Pogba from Juve to United in the summer of 2016, it is claimed that the Red Devils boss first tried to sign Gareth Bale and Antoine Griezmann.

The Arseblog went one step better with their creative prank, by claiming that the club had already installed a sound system which has been recording our singing and chanting at the Emirates Stadium, which will then be used to boost the atmosphere at home games, following an increased lack of backing of our players from the sidelines.

The Mirror claim they could now face competition from Arsenal, who have a better track record of handing opportunities to promising young players, with Chelsea known for snapping up talents like Bailey and then immediately sending them out on loan.

The women's pole vault saw another world - leading performance and also a Diamond League record as world champion Yarisley Silva cleared 4.84 m to claim victory before twice attempting a PB of 4.92 m and then calling it a day.

Britain's Ugen, who secured her spot for the event by winning the IAAF World Indoor Tour, settled into the competition with three 6.60m - plus leaps but then improved to 6.93 m in the fifth round to equal the national indoor record set by Katarina Johnson - Thompson last winter and claim GB's first medal of Portland 2016.

It was a record fourth successive trophy for the Argentina star, who won both the FIFA World Player of the Year and the Ballon d'Or in 2009 before then claiming the FIFA Ballon d'Or in 2010 and 2011 when the two prizes were merged.

The E&E Legal Institute then weighed in, responding to the claims of the university and the public record's custodian in stating that it is in the public interest to ensure «transparency» of academic research that taxpayers finance and that the state's public record laws allow for such public disclosure.

Audio recording during a roadside stop of a suspected cartel associate catches what the film's subtitles claim is a command to question and then dispose of him.

The State claimed Achievement First Bridgeport Academy demonstrated a better record of achievement then did Bridgeport's public schools, but failed to note that Achievement First's students are less poor, and face fewer language barriers and disabilities.

And if, on the other hand, Malloy, the CEA and the AFT want to claim that Malloy is the «better of two evils,» then at the very least they have the obligation to tell the truth about Malloy's record.

If Volkswagen wants to claim the EV record at Pikes Peak, then 8 minutes, 57.118 seconds is the time to beat.

This is then recorded in county records offices and becomes a public record as there is a legal claim or hold against your property.

It's incredibly hypocritical of global warming denialists to whine that compilations of global temperature anomaly like GISTEMP have large distances between recording stations and this makes them an inaccurate estimate of global anomaly and then we have a global warming denialist extraordinaire, Roberts, claim that a SINGLE locality, Central England, can provide an adequate estimate of global anomaly.

So you will draw 200 cores from a stand of trees, screen them for correlation to temperature from some series of instrumental temperatures, hopefully taken at more or less the same altitude within 100 miles of the stand of trees, and claim that tree X is a good treemometer because it correlates with the temperature record while tree Y which grew 20 feet away is a bad treemometer because it correlates less well, and throw away 60 % of the cores accordingly, and then claim that you can extrapolate what the temperature in that stand of trees was doing 500, 700, 1000 years earlier based on the 40 % you retain?

If the recent temperature record statistically significantly deviated from the multi-decadal positive temperature trend, then this would be empirical evidence for the claim something has been different in recent years.

Readers might perform a little thought experiment: suppose that Spencer and Christy had published a temperature history in which they claimed that 1934 was the warmest U.S. year on record and then it turned out that they had been a computer programming error opposite to the one that Hansen made, that Wentz and Mears discovered there was an error of 0.15 deg C in the Spencer and Christy results and, after fiixing this error, it turned out that 2006 was the warmest year on record.

If seasonal forecasting is now being claimed to be a climate issue, then we are faced with a turf war between meteorologists, who have done a pretty darn god job, and climate scientists, who seem to be seeking a new job description but have an unfortunate track record.

Many times you write in such general terms that when you are confronted with instrument records that contradict your speculations, you shift to paleoclimatological timeframes, and then when confronted with paleoclimatological reconstruction data that refute your conjecture, you rely on the generality of your writings to claim it wasn't what you meant.

The participants in the countermovement have attacked climate models, paleoclimatic data on which warming trends are based, modern temperature records, mainstream scientists who have claimed there is an urgent need to act, and manufactured bogus non-peer-reviewed climate science claims which they have then widely publicized in books and pamphlets, and then widely circulated the publications to journalists and politicians, tactics which have succeeded in getting the disinformation propaganda widely distributed by friendly media.

But then, you have ascribed the increase at the end of HadCRUT record, which according to your own analysis is DUE TO THE 323 YEAR CYCLE, and claimed that it was the effect of humankind.

This is incredibly misleading; starting with a record low and then measuring from that is hardly what I'd call an honest claim.

Another example, if one claimed the post 1980 divergence issue in tree rings was out of sample confirmation data, then it would fail and clearly invalidate the tree ring proxy record.

if no individual tide gauge records show a recent surge (and only a tiny fraction of long running ones show any trend change at all in recent decades), then claims that sea levels are surging are simply not tenable, for if GLOBAL sea levels are rising you would by logic alone expect that this would show up in actual single sites all over the globe.

You need a lesson in street smart logic: if no individual tide gauge records show a recent surge (and only a tiny fraction of long running ones show any trend change at all in recent decades), then claims that sea levels are surging are simply not tenable, for if GLOBAL sea levels are rising you would by logic alone expect that this would show up in actual single sites all over the globe.

The only change since then is that the evidence for human - caused climate change has become even more overwhelming, though there are still plenty of people who combine global warming denialism (or a long track record of denialism, with no admission of error) with the claim that «nuclear power is the only solution to climate change.»

@willis: You wrote: «Finally, if your claim is that the sun roolz the climate, then why is there no sign of the ~ 11 year sunspot cycle in the records?»

Finally, if your claim is that the sun roolz the climate, then why is there no sign of the ~ 11 year sunspot cycle in the records?

, even the, um, cherrypicked quotes about the 1990s from then environment minister David Anderson do not support the claim, since they clearly refer to the instrumental record and don't even compare those years to pre-20th century temperatures:

Then we need to prove the value of the claim, which requires reviewing medical records and working with medical experts to establish the prognosis and effects of the injury — including the physical, emotional, and financial effects.

Our lawyers will then collect evidence to support your claim, including medical records, documents and the opinions of independent mental health experts.

When patients make claims of negligence the process of discovering whether negligence occurred requires investigating medical records, interviewing the involved parties (through sworn depositions), finding experts, sorting out conflicts between the opinions of experts, reinvestigating the records and testimony as new insights are uncovered and then reaching some kind of consensus, if possible, about what actually occurred and whether those facts meet the definition of legal negligence.

If you have a poor driving record scattered with several accidents and insurance claims, then your rental insurance will be higher, as the company will assume that you are more of a «high risk» driver than someone with a -LSB-...]

When determining quotes for actual premiums for potential policyholders, insurance providers start with home insurance rates but then consider factors unique to each individual - the size and age of the house, the location, and the customer's record of filing claims.

My sister has been living with an eating disorder for a few years now, and a few weeks prior to our cruisetrip, her disorder took a turn for the worse... We has filed a claim more than 4 months ago, gave them all the required documentation, and every now and then they will send us a freaking letter asking for more document / proof of medical records...

If you think you are a good driver with a good enough driving record and without necessary claims then stay within the standard insurance since this also offers better coverage and of course better premiums that you might not need to be worrying much anymore.

If your relative has a clean record and no claims in his or her past, then you may want to add that person to your insurance.

If your spouse can raise his credit score and have any violations and claims drop off his record (which they will in time), then your rates will be lowered.

If your spouse has bad credit, a bad driving record or multiple claims, then you can expect your rates to increase.

If you have a good driving record and you don't commute a lot, then you might actually get away with much smaller premiums than those with risky profiles and past claims.

Obviously, if the WI providers of renters insurance can see that you have a clean record and you have minimal, if any, Wisconsin renters insurance claims under your Social Security number, then they will likely reward that with lower Harambee renters insurance price quotes.

In most states policies have a two year contestability period, but if you live longer than two years, most companies will not order medical records, therefore if they have not found out by then that you are a smoker, they will probably never find out and will just pay the claim, but if they do find out, and the policy has been in force for over two years, my understanding is they will only pay the reduced amount previously mentioned as well as in the first two years.

Before the office will send money, victims must fill out claim forms and submit personal information, copies of police reports and details about their insurance policies, and then be prepared to gather numerous medical and financial records, according to application details on Bondi's website.

Then, the new «hero» went official, and the bulk of press materials announcing its release contained bold claims regarding photo - taking and video - recording performance.