Sentences with phrase «then discuss the results»

The doctor will then discuss the results with you.

In what follows, I will first describe the methodology that AAAS uses to track R&D generally and then discuss the results of these outyear analyses in more detail.

Teachers scored the papers together and then discussed the results.

We then independently examined data from 5 of the participants in this study, analyzed the data, then discussed the results of the analysis and revised our conclusions until agreement was reached.

, by George Hallowell and Joan Holub, students can compare and contrast Jenny's and Katie's journeys on the Oregon Trail with the use of Venn diagrams, either individually or in small or large groups, and then discuss the results.

Not exact matches

It was the result of a nearly 16 - year relationship between NBC and Trump, and it premiered a year after Jeff Zucker, then the president of NBC, and «Survivor» producer Mark Burnett began discussing TV - show ideas with Trump.

We discuss the pain point, we address the results desired, and then we all go to work.

The Lead Independent Director and our General Counsel then report the results of these interviews at meetings of the nominating and corporate governance committee and our board of directors, where the results are discussed.

I will briefly explain the periodization that results and then discuss its relation to higher education, and...

I will briefly explain the periodization that results and then discuss its relation to higher education, and in particular to the American liberal arts college.

The god of the torah and bible has too many self - contradictions to be a valid being to either believe or disbelieve, and if there's nothing to test and study with verifiable results, then it's pointless to discuss except as philosophy.

If you don't have a food processor then you can just buy all your almonds ready ground however, the results might be slighly different to the cookies pictured (as discussed in the blog post above).

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

NOTE: If you are worried about your baby's refusal to eat from a spoon, or you feel that he is not eating enough as a result, then it's always a good idea to discuss your concerns with a medical professional.

She told me to go for the tests, and then come to the birth center to discuss the results and our options.

The team then discuss the fallout of Ed Miliband's «second kitchen», whether politicians can — or should — keep their families out of the media spotlight, and the lessons from the Israeli election result.

Every member of the Assembly knew from Day One that, if we were going to deliver real results for the women of New York, we would need to take up the 10 points in this plan on an individual basis, have each debated and discussed individually — and then let democracy take its course.

If you disagree with the use of modern scientific inquiry to obtain meaningful results to questions about the world around us, then there is nothing to discuss.

Then you may find it difficult to make the necessary changes, but if you just adjust your nutrition habbits in accordance with everything we discussed above, you may be (pleasantly) surprised with the results.

As discussed in Part I of the Sock Doc First Aid For Injuries, if you didn't have some sort of traumatic accident then your injury was slowly developing over time due to muscle imbalances which resulted from too...

The patient then returns for a follow up appointment to discuss the results and begin on a nutritional and supplement plan to assist with healing the gut and eliminating the source of the allergy.

In a much - discussed article published in December, The Atlantic editor - in - chief James Bennet summed this argument up well: «When you do nt have to print words on pages and then bundle the pages together and stick postage stamps on the result,» he wrote, «you slip some of the constraints that have enforced excellence (and provided polite excuses for editors to trim fat) since Johannes Gutenberg began printing books.

In development since 2014, but publicly discussed before that, the planned X-Men spinoff has been dealt setback after setback, resulting in its initial October 2016 release date being pushed back first to February 2019, then to June 2019, and now to... well, it's unclear.

Print out the cards double sided, let pupils pick their cards, and then interpret the results and pin them with blue tack, and then discuss the correlation.

In their reflections, new teachers describe one of their practices, discuss why they're using it (linking it to specific research) then use supporting evidence to explain the results of the practice and where to take it next.

Teachers are supposed to discuss test results in after - school «data chats» and then review weak skills in class.

We compared results and discussed differences of opinion, then went back to the data set to reconcile and repeat the analysis until we reached agreement.

They will then test their designs and discuss the results.

In other words, the essay first discusses exactly why different things happen and then delves into the details regarding what happens as a result.

If, for instance, you hire me to proofread your manuscript before publication and I find there are numerous grammar and usage errors, I will stop and contact you with a sample of your manuscript showing my findings, and we can then discuss perhaps copyediting instead, which would result in a change in fee and the time involved.

This is an absolute tie, can't even be discussed until the phone's are in the wild and put to good use, and even then the results are subjective.

Our inspector reviews and discusses inspection results on site with you and then delivers our inspection report digitally.

The results of the tests and an interpretation of these results will be sent to the veterinary surgeon, who will then discuss the laboratory report with the owner and advise on any subsequent action, e.g. need for further tests, treatment, etc..

Next week, I promise we'll get to discussing some of the games from that TIGSource Assemblee Competition, but until then, feel free to check out the results yourself.

If there is a difference, then you make your best argument for your choice, show the results making a different choice and let folks discuss the merits.

If this task is daunting — and it should be, because it is openly impossible in the contexts they discuss — then perhaps you could provisionally accept that every physicist in the world is a) not an idiot; and b) not engaged in some sort of global conspiracy just because a result that you want to believe in happens to violate the thermodynamic laws of physics.

If you're going to discuss competence issues, then, starting from the premise that the ONCA reasons set out everything that's relevant, ask your audience to consider what the first instance result in Sataur v Starbucks 2017 ONCA 1017 tells them.

While the result is a cumbersome calculation, I see no need to resort to any exceptional construction of the legislation, as discussed by Lamer J., as he then was, in R. v. Paul, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 621 at 662, in order to achieve the legislative intent of ss.

The lead article reported on a 2006 survey conducted by the Association Of Corporate Counsel (incidentally, no longer known as the American Corporate Counsel Association, as it is referred to in the article), and then discussed a Section of Litigation program from the recent annual meeting which discussed the results of the ACC survey.

This article discusses the role of the intervention of the Women's Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF) in the case of Vriend v Alberta, [1998] 1 SCR 493, a case which resulted in the SCC ordering the ground of «sexual orientation» to be read into Alberta's human rights legislation (then the Individual's Rights Protection Act).

In 2007, Professor Curcio gave her first - year Civil Procedure class five single - issue essay questions over the course of the semester.134 After students turned each assignment in, the professor provided an annotated model answer.135 In addition, the professor spent some class time discussing the models and providing time for self - and peer - edits.136 The students in Professor Curcio's class and in another Civil Procedure class then took the same final exam.137 Professor Curcio and the other professor graded all the exams from both classes.138 The results showed that students who practiced and received feedback performed better than those students who had not had the opportunity to practice and receive feedback.139 Most of the benefit, however, accrued to students who had above - the - median LSAT scores.140 For those students with below - the - median LSAT scores, the study found no statistically significant difference between scores of those who had received the feedback and those who had not.141 In 2010, the school's median LSAT was 161.142

Disputes are first discussed at a case conference, and if that doesn't result in a settlement, then there is a hearing led by an independent adjudicator, who will make a decision that must be followed.

He discussed his experience as an orthopaedic surgeon in which patients with asymptomatic arthritis would then have symptomatic arthritis as a result of a minor force which did not require a direct impact, such as twisting a knee.

If this conversation doesn't yield results, then you can discuss the problem and your efforts to address it with your supervisor.

When discussing results, we refer to «students» or «boys and girls» where findings are similar, and then present separate percentages and highlight where there are differences for boys and girls.

The student and his / her parents are then invited for a feedback session where the results will be presented to them and options will be discussed.

Then you can compare your results and discuss the implications.

We will then schedule a feedback session, during which we will discuss your results, diagnostic information, and treatment recommendations.

We then consider the feasibility of distinguishing between trait - like and state - like regulation by discussing the results of a simulation study.

Couples fill out a questionnaire individually online (about 30 - 45 minutes) and then meet with me for about 3 - 6 sessions to discuss the results.