Sentences with phrase «then forms the government»

The party winning the majority of seats then forms the government.

Not exact matches

On a weekly or bi-weekly basis, business owners or their accountants must pour over spreadsheets, making calculations, filling out government forms, and cut checks for various taxes and payments and then often deposit those payments into various accounts.

It's then possible that such networks — owned and controlled by people rather than corporations or governments — could grow and join together to form a new Internet.

Odd that there wasn't a chorus about how government, in the form of NASA, was unable to handle space flight back then, or even back when there were other disasters and failures in our spaceflight program.

To the extent that I understand it, this criticism seems odd to me: after all, money flows around (and around and around) the economy, and is taxed at various points along the way (and is then injected back into the economy, of course, in the form of government spending).

Then no matter what, they will never form a government in Alberta.

All users need to do is upload their transactions, await the calculations, and then send the resulting Form 8949 to the government when they file,» Woodin said.

The unknown head of the Advanced Research Sector 7 arm of the government makes himself known to the Secretary of Defense, informing him of the existence of Sector 7, and how it was formed in secrecy 80 years ago by then - President Hoover to deal with extraterrestrial threats or occurrences.

They create fear in the lower class by saying the conservatives will do away with welfare and then say they will keep it in place and make sure that the people continue to get what they are getting now.The Conservatives point to the 47 % who are taking some form of government handout and tell their base that this should not be so in its present state, but should be reformed.

The liberal answer is that if all of us, in the form of taxes, are paying, then contractors» programs must exhibit the government's values of fairness and equal opportunity.

Your government was formed on the principles that government should do what its people dictate... but then evangelists aren't known to be entirely truthful.

«If it becomes clear that the national interest which is stable and principled government can be best served by forming a coalition between the Labour party and the Liberal democrats, then I believe I should discharge that duty to form that government which would in my view command a majority in the House of Commons in the Queen's Speech and any other confidence votes.

The Queen would then, according to the Cabinet manual, «invite the person who appears most likely to be able to command the confidence of the House as prime minister and to form a government».

This, according to them was because «the issue that came before the Supreme Court was simply constitutional interpretation so for (with all respect) the learned judge (Justice Jones Dotse) to go beyond the constitutional interpretation and then decide that the applicant had no contract with the government and therefore the applicant had no case and that the applicant had formed an alliance to create, loot and share was beyond what was before the business of the Supreme Court.»

It would be much clearer to voters if they could see that in our parliamentary system, first we elect a parliament, and then it is up to the new parliament to decide who shall form the government.

To secure the public good and private rights against the danger of such a faction, and at the same time to preserve the spirit and the form of popular government, is then the great object to which our inquiries are directed.

And if you can gridlock government then that's a form of success because then government doesn't work and in many ways they're going their from stopping the government from functioning.

But I did so not because I have been a life - long LibDem supporter or because, as a Swiss dual - national, I believe that direct democracy is necessarily the best of all forms of government, but because of what happened since then: I simply underestimated at the time the power of direct democracy, once its genie is let out of the bottle.

If the forecasters and betting markets are right in their central forecasts then Con + LD+DUP combined will be short of a majority and so a Labour led government should form if they can secure the support of the SNP and probably others, including the Liberal Democrats, will be needed too: a potentially messy and unstable situation but also one where there is sufficient similarity in ideological perspective for policy agreement on plenty of issues.

Unless pretty much all the other parties gang up to form an anti-Tory government then this scenario would appear at first glance to be again fundamentally one of Hobson's choice for the Liberal Democrats.

He then formed a non-partisan government and took up the unpopular role of imposing necessary but painful reforms that the previous political class did not have the willingness nor the political legitimacy to implement.

He then moved on to the issue of votes of confidence, which the Bill would still make subject to a simple majority, but rather than causing an immediate general election, there would be a fortnight for a new government to be formed which could command the confidence of the Commons, before a new election had to take place:

If the national interest can be served by such a coalition then I should discharge the duty to form that government.

If Labour formed a government then party funding could be cleaned up on all sides, but the election is not yet in the bag.

The more seats a party or grouping has, the more chance it has of forming a government - with 198 seats out of 646 the Conservative Party could only form a government if significant numbers of other MP's decided to back them, as happened in 1924 when there was a situation that the Conservatives didn't want to form a coalition with either other main party and equally the Liberals didn't want a coalition with Labour and the Liberals and Conservatives saw it as an opportunity to allow Labour into government but in a situation in which legislation was still reliant on Liberal and Conservative votes and they could be brought down at the most suitable time, supposing the notional gains were accurate and in the improbable event of the next election going exactly the same way in terms of votes then 214 out of 650 is 32.93 % of seats compared to at 198 out of 646 seats - 30.65 % of seats and the Conservative Party would then be 14 seats closer towards a total neccessary to form a government allowing for the greater number of seats, on the one hand the Conservatives need Labour to fail but equally they need to succeed themselves given that the Liberal Democrats appear likely to oppose anyone forming a government who does not embark on a serious programme to introduce PR, in addition PC & SNP would expect moves towards Independence for Scotland and Wales, the SDLP will be likely to back Labour and equally UKIP would want a committment to withdraw from Europe and anyway will be likely to be in small numbers if any, pretty much that leaves cutting a deal with the DUP which would only add the backing of an extra 10 - 13 MP's.

He has concluded that should a coalition be formed again after the next election, then a minimum of 30 ministers across Government would be required.

After the election if there is a majority then the previous Prime Minister continues to be the new Prime Minster but one without a government until he / she goes and forms one (after seeking «permission» from the monarch).

Then initially all the talk was that Labour couldn't win, that the Conservatives were the permanent government and Labour the permanent Official Opposition, then shortly after the Conservatives were written off and Labour was supposedly virtually assurred of being able to form a government, even during the election campaign itself, but it didn't work out that Then initially all the talk was that Labour couldn't win, that the Conservatives were the permanent government and Labour the permanent Official Opposition, then shortly after the Conservatives were written off and Labour was supposedly virtually assurred of being able to form a government, even during the election campaign itself, but it didn't work out that then shortly after the Conservatives were written off and Labour was supposedly virtually assurred of being able to form a government, even during the election campaign itself, but it didn't work out that way.

If (s) he can not form a government that commands the confidence of the House then it is expected that (s) he will resign that commission voluntarily — it is not considered acceptable for the Sovereign (or her representative) to revoke said commission unless the prime minister was acting in serious breach of constitutional protocol.

There was some discussion after the election of the possibility of creating a Conservative minority government and, because the then Prime Minister Gordon Brown had the first opportunity to form a government, there were also talks about creating some sort of alliance between the Labour Party, the Liberal Democrats and other smaller parties.

If one party obtains a majority of seats, then that party is entitled to form the Government.

For example in 2004, the then governor of Cross River State said the PDP was a conclave and that a one party state was the best form of government.

For ver a year now, quite a significant number of Ghanaians have over billions of cedis locked up and the government think that is not a serious issue that requires immediate resolution then you then begin to wonder, what then is emergency, the situation have had serious repercussions not only on economic activities but rather have brought several deaths cases in the form of hanging, poisoning, records from hospitals at these areas affirm this.

Until then, we'd been able to maintain the pretence, at least for our own benefit, that we would form a majority government and introduce our manifesto wholesale.

At the end of the day, though, Stack Exchange Inc. has final say in all matters, and if we assume Stack Exchange Inc. as a single entity then we are talking about a benevolent dictatorship, a (mostly benign) authoritarian form of government.

If Labour are to form a coalition government with the Lib Dems following the next election, then I would rather deal with Clegg than Cable.

At 9:41 am on 7 May, the BBC confirmed a «hung parliament», as it was by then impossible for the Conservative party to gain the number of seats needed to form a majority government.

Since then, Gallo has inveighed against alleged «party elites» and accused fellow elected officials — including Assemblyman Kevin Cahill, Common Council President James Noble, former council majority leader Tom Hoffay and current Council Majority Leader Matt Dunn — of forming a «shadow government» to thwart his policies and eventually unseat him.

If, however, the aim is to give the Lords leverage, such that the Government would be more likely to re-lay the statutory instrument in a form that met at least some of the Lords» concerns, then a power to delay for a fixed period would be necessary.

The largest party in an election is likely to win a smaller number of proportional seats, so that governing parties may lose diversity, unless the members elected from the party list when it was in opposition then win local seats when the party gains enough support to form the government.

Leadership election Gordon Brown told the assembled media outside Downing Street: «If it becomes clear that the national interest, which is stable and principled government, which can be best served by forming a coalition between the Labour party and the Liberal Democrats, then I believe I should discharge that duty to form that government which would in my view command a majority in the House of Commons in the Queen's speech any other confidence votes.

«If what we're only concerned about in our elections is cost, then dictatorship is the cheapest form of government.»

And then under the (Fixed - Term) Parliaments Act that the Westminster parliament's passed but nobody seems to have read, you'd then have a two - week period to form another government - and of course you want to form another government because this might be people's only chance to form another government.»

The idea is to provide dedicated funding to the U.S. Global Change Research Program to conduct such assessments, which would then form a base for government and the private sector to plan for the effects of climate change.

The data will then be presented in the form of reports to responsible government agencies.

This text then forms an important blueprint for the recently formed International Network of Government Science Advice (INGSA) to work from, as it engages more broadly during four consultation events held on four continents.

First suppressed and then censored by the Polish government, Blind Chance is here presented in its complete original form.

THE GREEN PRINCE is the story of how Gonen and Mossab formed an unbreakable, personal bond when Gonen, then a Shin Beit agent, recruited Mossab, the son of a co-founder of Hamas, to spy for the Israeli government.

First let me give you some background on who I am and then you can judge my allegations of FRAUD and SCAM against Amazon and Jeff Bezos properly, since my words carry a lot of weight with many in high level government positions and investors as well as major players in technology as well as over 100,000 members of organizations I formed.

If you are among the one in three (38 % to be slightly more accurate) Canadians currently taking advantage of the federal government's most generous form of tax relief — the Registered Retirement Savings Plan — commonly known as the RRSP, then you already know what we're talking about.