Sentences with phrase «then get the facts»

And then you got fact the solar energy is simply not viable source of energy - and never will be.

Not exact matches

If we are not serious about facts and what's true and what's not, and particularly in an age of social media when so many people are getting their information in sound bites and off their phones, if we can't discriminate between serious arguments and propaganda, then we have problems.

Although products and services can be sold directly on Facebook, it's often times far easier to get the lead on Facebook and then sell them into your program after the fact.

I liked the fact that people came together and batted around ideas, and then, as an editor, you would look for the perfect writer for it, somebody who could make it better than you imagined, then ultimately putting an issue together was about getting the right mix and the right tone.

In fact, if nothing else, you could say that the story of Andy Grove — a busboy who fled a life lived under Fascists, Nazis, and Communists to get an education at an institution free to all, including refugees, then taking that knowledge and using it to help invent an entire industry — illustrates exactly what makes America great.

«The fact is, what the 40 - year - old state worker should be concerned about right now is getting reform, because if they just put their heads in the sand, then we will have a Detroit - like problem in New Jersey, in Illinois, in California, and lots of other states across this country,» he said.

But then you need to adjust for the fact that Americans buy some foreign - made stuff (imports) and sell some stuff to foreigners (exports)-- so you add that together and get net exports (NX), which need to be added or subtracted from the total.

Even then, the fact of the matter is that you will get the smoothest shave with feather blades!

In fact, the general strategy was to get the men in, and then the women would follow.

Mining stocks are an extremely volatile asset class where the odds of any investor getting into a story, experiencing impressive gains, only to then take a round trip back to break - even... and finally into NEGATIVE territory are actually quite high (sadly)... In fact, that dreaded rollercoaster ride where you see all your once «hefty» profits in any single position later eviscerated into NOTHING is something that I've experienced more often than I'd like to admit...

(Of course then you have to consider the fact that rental income would also be less, but it is easier for someone to get their foot in the door compare to your $ 1 mil property scenario)

In fact, aside from the cost of getting trained and licensed, you will just need to purchase a computer, requisite software, and then have a budget set aside for marketing yourself.

Often we are faced with disparate information, incomplete data, only parts of the puzzle rather than the whole, or hints and innuendo rather than verifiable fact, and then are required to make important investment decisions where the downside if we get it wrong can be quite painful.

Then the fact that we are so entrenched in Philly helps people to get multiple referrals over and over again when they are seeking search firms.

What you don't seem to get is that you casual implied I was sub-human in our conversation (that the best of me is only as good as the worse of a «normal» person), and yet you don't seem to display any recognition of that fact, any remorse at having said it, nor any appreciation of the hypocracy of then saying we are the same, that you love me and that you are a friend to me.

I sure get a chuckle out of the «Great Disappointment» story — and then marvel at the fact that the religion is still around!

Circular religious logic will still never fully justify the fact that religion asks for special rights and protections, which it gets, and then turns those rights and protections on other groups as a defense mechanism for when they are accused of discriminating... i.e. «We can choose who we accept and who we don't because of our beliefs... wait, what... how can you say you will not accept our religious organization, that's religious discrimination!»

In fact I bet you're one of those hypocrite teabagger trolls who are happy to have the government pave their roads, provide public schools for their kids, provide a mortgage credit, etc. then whine about all those fictional people getting so much for free.

If, on the other hand, he somehow got a glimpse of the fact that I am calling for a biblically grounded and distinctive Christian political philosophy, then he should have seen that I do not merely «come precariously close» to trying to do such a thing; that is precisely what the book is about.

Until you do then I can only assume that you are completely uneducated and haven't got a clue as to the facts.

If there is a God and there is just as much for as against, But lets say there is a God and he made everything Including you and He gets to make the rules because lets face it hes a lot bigger then you, So unfortunately he only wants those who believe in him based on the information given, Lets look at the facts based on the Book,, Some of his own angels turned on him and they see him every day... That had to hurt, So he decides With man he only wants those with the faith to believe based on His book and faith found thru the holy spirit, If you refuse to believe then he cant use you, cant trust you, so he will choose to toss you aside, Hey I understand It ai nt fair, Your important, Your Smart, But unfortunately hes bigger then you and he has the Juice, You either play by the rules or wait and see what not believing leads too.

The fact that a few engaged in extreme bullying within the group (I was repeatedly bullied by one of the ring leaders over at Stollar's blog) who then upon not getting their way turned to lies in order to attack David, should not compel him to change anything about his group.

I'm just as keen to get to the facts as everyone else but if you are prevented by confidentiality agreements then I suggest you post the «confidentiality agreement» paragraphs that prevent you from posting the evidence.

The fact is, to get to «repentance» a person will need to come face to face with the reason they do need to repent — and way too many run away from church then and there.

If you're going to use the stupidly overdone kiddie world of warcraft «fail» meme like all of the other idiots, then at least get your facts straight.

In fact it would be a greater blessing from the Christian perspective because I would then get to inherit eternal life and be with my Savior, whom I long to see.

But you still get dimwits who buy Saint's Row and think it's about Christian morals despite the fact it says «Excessive violence, gore, partial nu.di.ty, overt se.xua.l themes, and language» and then have the audacity to go after the video game industry for creating adult themed games.

We all got a problem with our own cultural supremacy, but if we really want to learn how to preach a fuller Gospel that really invites people to revel in the fact that they are alive and they are created in God's image, then we have to take the truth that we know is owned by the author of truth and we have to go and begin to participate with people who have a gram, a grain of that golden truth.

Then those that are left (surviving genocides and «nature») will get a clue and realize that only God has the ability to create the complexities of the human eye, circulatory system, the fact we have (had) the needed water and atmosphere was not a random perfection that just occurred... will change their minds and ask for forgiveness that was already granted them through Jesus, if they chose to accept it.

you claim that «The Pope's critique of capitalism thrilled many liberal Catholics»..., then, scrolling down, you get in your lefty dig at Rush by contradicting the above claim with «In fact, Francis» predecessor, Benedict XVI, now pope emeritus, could be just as strong a critic of capitalism, blah blah blah..

I also love the fact that Christians will pump up their chests and claim they are over two billion strong and then claim that those catholics aren't real Christians, or another sect claiming that creationists are not true Christians, So how many true Scotsman / Christians are there when they seem to get great pleasure in stabbing each other in the back.

Get the facts, then write your editorial.

Then there is the sad and, to my mind, unmistakable fact that people who have adopted the so - called «presumption against war» tend to get things wrong, time and again: as the U.S. bishops got the dynamics of the Cold War wrong in their 1983 pastoral letter, «The Challenge of Peace»; as most religious leaders and intellectuals got it wrong in predicting a Middle East Armageddon in the first Gulf War and the recent Iraq War.

I said most of the religions though, if you look, study and get the facts then there are some belief systems based on fact.

The fact of God indwelling us through His Holy Spirit is going to make a change in our lives and will have much relevance to everyday life so I don't know where you get the idea that «if we accept that the Kingdom is now a «spiritual» Kingdom only, then that leads to the situation where the Kingdom becomes a religious idea that has little relevance to everyday life, very interesting to theologians, pulpiteers and pew audiences, but no dynamic to transform people into action».

My point in all of this is, everybody has their own beliefs, and i respect that fact... i don't care, i'm not going to attack your religion but i expect the same respect from you... If i don't get it then that is proof to me that you're not a good person....

But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble.

The historical problem presented by the Gospels is, then, not the problem of determining whether the character of the early Christians, their faith, and the exigencies of their life and work have colored and overlaid the facts of Jesus» teaching and life, but is, rather, the problem of determining just how we should use our knowledge of this fact in our efforts to get back to the so - called historical Jesus» own words and life.

I do nt know whats worse the fact that a white man could be accused of the same thing this man is accused of and we as blacks would be screaming bloody murder or the fact that he marched against gay marriages, and took personal shots at other pastor and then he gets exposed 4 what he really is and that ironically is everything he preached and marched against sad

In fact, I think that Jamal got himself in a bit of trouble by some of the things they discussed... listen to the two Podcasts and then go read his blog to find out why... You should also read Brandon's blog.

If you think for a second that any Christian is going to let a little thing like the facts get in the way of doing exactly as they please then you haven't been paying attention.

A lion with bigger muscles will in fact get more food then a lion who doesn't.

He makes exactly the same movements as the other knight, infinitely renounces claim to the love which is the content of his life, he is reconciled in pain; but then occurs the prodigy, he makes still another movement more wonderful than all, for he says, «I believe nevertheless that I shall get her, in virtue, that is, of the absurd, in virtue of the fact that with God all things are possible.»

I also don't like the fact that you bring down the Christian faith and ultimately say God is not able to talk to His people this I believe is done because unless you can destroy the reputation of the church then you can not get your own way.»

If a woman is raped, it is extremely immoral to insist she carry that child to term and then be forced to relive the nightmare of the act of violence every day - how do you think that would affect a child (outside of the fact that people like you get your pocketbooks lined as a result)?

At first I was surprised, then frustrated, then — after hearing from so many of you — strangely encouraged by the fact that we're actually getting passionate and worked up about something that matters!

I other words, if John the Mediocre's activities were recorded as they happened but Jane the Magnificent's activities didn't get written down for 5 years after the fact, then even with copy errors and such, John's docu.mentation may be more reliable even if the earliest known docu.ment is more recent that Jane's earliest.

Fact is pastors make their living trying to tell everyone what they are doing wrong then they get caught doing the same thing.

And if you deny that, then you've got to face the fact that there are similarities among universals.

Why, then, is Mr. Long not bothered by the fact that those who get what amounts to a free gift in tax savings are not required to do any work?