Virtually all the social forces and institutions reinforce compulsory heterosexuality and if sexual fluidity means that actual orientation changes due to these cues,
then homosexual orientation should be much more rare and unstable than it is.
Not exact matches
But if that's so, he notes,
then it should govern the way Christians think about same - sex sexual activity as well, and thus he concludes: «When those with
homosexual orientation act on their desires in a loving, committed relationship, [they] are not, as far as I can see, violating the love command.»
As an atheist I don't believe in God anyway, but if there was a God he would have to be sadistic kind of monster to create people with a naturally
homosexual orientation and
then condemn them for it.
In its decision, one of the judges referred to the claim for equal human rights protection as an effort to seek «the validation of
homosexual relations, including sodomy, as a protected and fundamental right... rebutting a millennia of moral teaching» and
then shockingly went on to liken the protection of sexual
orientation in human rights legislation with the «violently aberrant sexual configurations» of mass murderers Jeffrey Dahmer, Paul Bernardo and Clifford Olsen.
Having held that there are no limits to the membership of a group based on sexual
orientation based on behaviour, or identity (para. 68), the Court
then focuses on «prohibited
homosexual acts» (para. 76), excluded by Article 10 (1)(d).