Sentences with phrase «then knowing the fact»

Not exact matches

In fact, if you have considered going international but don't really know where to start then this is a great way of dipping your toes in the international waters!

«Then we apply a some fairly strict criteria of positive identification: How do we know who that is and what they're doing, and we have multiple intelligence requirements — it can't just be one thing; we have multiple indications that that is in fact what's going on from that place,» he said, adding:

When reports draw a false equivalence between the actual facts and the president's so - called «alternative facts,» then you will know a line has been crossed.

Instead, it's apparently a matter of sloppy record - keeping — coupled with the fact that when students take out private loans, they're often sold and bundled together, and then «sold to investors through a process known as securitization.»

I suspect we all know the answer to that question, but if the answer is, in fact, yes, then, as before, we should not be surprised if other nations are hacking our own parties» infrastructures.

«I don't know that they're talking about impeachment, but whether they have the facts and the law to make a determination of how they go forward — we don't have that information,» Pelosi said then.

And at the end of the day, the fact that this conspiracy refuses to die says something about how Facebook users view the company: as a stalker that creeps on their privacy, and then can't be believed when it tells you, «no, trust me, we don't do that.»

Then there's the fact that 63 percent of millennials — also known as digital natives — are just as comfortable working from mobile devices as they are from desktop computers.

Here's one very basic fact you need to keep in mind: If you accept the Synoptic gospels» assertion that this all happened at Passover, then you MUST immediately know that the entire account is fiction.

Whatever one believes in the fact is and goes without saying that we will all die and then the truth will be made known.

It's quite simple... all you need to is look at the facts, be honest about the situation and then you will know why it's important to support Israel.

If those who truly want to know God then learn who is Our Saviour is because He is Jewish and Salvation is through the Jews and this is a fact.

Unscientificlaly you are incorrect because you have to believe the Bible whatever it says no matter what even if it can't be true, if you disagree then you are worng even if you have facts supporting what you say.

Of course if Lemaitre were around back then no doubt J2P2 might have rehabilitated him and his reputation 350 years or so after the fact, just as he did with Galileo.

But if we are talking about just the age difference and in their particular culture (if in fact the numbers that you gave are accurate, and I admit that I don't know one way or the other), then I don't know how, in that culture that there was anything wrong with it.

i did read page 2 and i know what im talking about you obiosly do nt because you all think hitler was a christian and he wasnt because im a christian and i know for a fact christians do nt act like that you can claim it all youd like but you should of read more up on history and if you think hitler was a christian your wrong because even if he said he was a christian then he wasnt a real one

Check out this link to find out about marriage to young girls claim.Very very interesting to know.I hope everyone has the patience to study history and reality of life centuries ago worldwide.This video also gives you references to online history books about facts it says.Simply, the average age of marriage was very young worldwide including church approved age of consent to marry.What Mohamed did, was very common back in the days and just to let you know, that girl was engaged to another man and then the engagement was broken due to his disbelief which tells you that that was common back in the days.Also, the age of 6 mentioned was age of engagement not age of marriage.marriage happened a few years later.

If you were a real Christian you would know Christs words speak for themselves and the fact that he didn't take the sword away and turn it into a pruning shear right then and there does not mean he was saying «I mean all this stuff is for later after I come back and kill all the evil people and those who haven't accepted me as their savior so you won't have to fear anyone so you can finally give up your guns and weapons of war...» You disgust me chad.

And if in the end, my beliefs are in fact fantasy, then at least I was kind to those I knew and those I didn't know, and I lived happy being faithful and positive.

You may believe you already know them, but if you do in fact know the full facts then you do everyone a disservice by your reply here.

, avoids discussion of many moral sticking points of the next few millennia (even though he knew in advance they'd be sticking points and could have provided clearer guidance), and then makes one of the central points of the entire story — and his entire reason for being here really — a personal sacrifice that is so va.gue that no one can even explain how or what was, in fact, sacrificed.

When people want to know if the woman asked for it, dressed for it, needed it, or if they want to know her sexual history and previous complaints, then they betray the fact that they indeed probably do believe her story, but the reason it happened must be her fault, or she's interpreting the experience wrong.

Peter, in fact, teaches clearly that it is possible to know the Lord and then return to unrighteousness and that person is worse off than if they had never become a Christian.

If not, then you can't rule out another possibility, unless you can prove that you know for a fact with 100 % certainty of our origins.

Then, too, Christians are convinced that the church can no longer play its traditional role in regard to the poor — the role of assistance, partial response, individual aid, palliative measures — because, as they see it, the problem is no longer that of the poor individual but of the system; and to ameliorate the situation of some poor people is in fact to reinforce the system, and to end injustice for one individual is to refrain from combating social injustice.

I guess sometimes it's humbling to sit and think about how many people believe in every different religion no matter how different they are and then science and accepting the fact that a HUGE majority of people are going to be right or wrong when they die and some people spending their entire life trying to justify or prove something that may be wrong.

Then it is no longer a conjugal act, nor is it in fact a sexual union in any proper sense at all.

If you know for a fact that your religion is true, and jihadists know for a fact that theirs is true, and both sides have prayed about it and god confirmed that its true, then how can this be enough for the ignoranus of the world to believe in religion?

There is only one spirit that would say you are not forgiven and that is the antichrist spirit, the same spirit that led men to smash the face in of Jesus so that he no longer looked like a human being then stood back and watched his life drain away on a hot sunny day not realising that he was in fact watching the freedom of men in all its glory.

This is an important question, because if the answer is «no» then the radical response is in fact the only viable option for Christians.

you mean that no one can know the will of God, then I submit to you that religion is entirely pointless because its existence is based on the assumption that we do in fact know the will of God.

We all got a problem with our own cultural supremacy, but if we really want to learn how to preach a fuller Gospel that really invites people to revel in the fact that they are alive and they are created in God's image, then we have to take the truth that we know is owned by the author of truth and we have to go and begin to participate with people who have a gram, a grain of that golden truth.

If any of the so called 100 pastors had even cracked the Bible with a ounce of understanding and not been so deluded that they couldn't see the facts as clear as the nose on their face then maybe we would know that they are liars or deceived or just trying to destroy a society that was at one time great.

Just because someone tells the truth, it's not a smear, it's fact, but then you wouldn't know a fact if it hit you in the face.

Because (if) there is (no) «life after death,» then in fact you (won't know), as you won't be aware of anything.

But none of the facts known then or now contradicts the belief that the really integral natural agents are, to some slight extent at least, both free and sentient.

I am just saying, if you are going to speak about something as if you know it for fact, then you might want some facts.

2cool, beside the fact that you don't seem to know what the Golden Rule is, am I to assume that you think we should teach the poor to do their own surgeries and then they too can be doctors?

Since you've been told that there is no life beyond the grave and you KNOW it is a fact because others told you so; then all religious people are deluded nutbars.

The fact of God indwelling us through His Holy Spirit is going to make a change in our lives and will have much relevance to everyday life so I don't know where you get the idea that «if we accept that the Kingdom is now a «spiritual» Kingdom only, then that leads to the situation where the Kingdom becomes a religious idea that has little relevance to everyday life, very interesting to theologians, pulpiteers and pew audiences, but no dynamic to transform people into action».

These were just misguided ways of speaking, for these speakers didn't realize that they were presupposing the classical view of the future as a domain of settled facts and then denying God knew it.

That's a fact so all this talk means nothing, you die and then nothing, best feeling is knowing that for all crazy stuff religious people do the moment they die the realization comes... oh no god!

I do nt know whats worse the fact that a white man could be accused of the same thing this man is accused of and we as blacks would be screaming bloody murder or the fact that he marched against gay marriages, and took personal shots at other pastor and then he gets exposed 4 what he really is and that ironically is everything he preached and marched against sad

«I think that when he accepts the fact that we know that he loves Jesus Christ then I think I'll like him a little better.

The meaning of testimony seems then inverted; the word no longer designates an action of speech, the oral report of an eyewitness about a fact to which he was witness.

However it rests on the fact that in saying «I know myself» the creature then must also in knowing himself accept himself.

to J.W. and fred — i think its rather silly to argue anything as fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most def.

A lack of fact in proving the existence of a god and a lack of fact proving that there is no omnipotent being who does not want to be made known but would rather have us develop faith in said omnipotent being, but since there are those who say well since there is no proof that such a being exists then I will conclude that no such being exists even though there is no proof established to verify that claim either.

When an age matures to a point where it displays a radical transference of interest, and when its very language reveals that what former times felt as fact are no longer so felt, then the central task is clearly exposed.

If the latter, then the fact that the local Washingtonians knew enough from the early signs of the storm's development to take cover long before a funnel cloud appeared indicates that tornados were not exactly unheard of in the area.