Mrs Rawlings left the NDC in 2012 to form the NDP after tensions between her and
the then leadership of the party reached uncontrollable levels.
Not exact matches
As Alliance leader, he helped bring about the merger with the Progressive Conservative
party,
then swept to the
leadership of the new
party in March
of this year.
He crafted a 25 - page memo to himself about how to retake Alberta, become leader
of a dilapidated PC
party, forge a merger with Wildrose, secure
leadership of that new
party and
then keep marching onwards, right at Premier Rachel Notley.
Mr. Kenney is reportedly backed by a cadre
of federal Conservative strategists and insiders, including former Reform
Party and Wildrose
Party campaign strategist Tom Flanagan, who told CBC that the group discussed whether «he could win the PC
leadership then negotiate a merger [with Wildrose].»
The results
of this strategy included the effective destruction
of the Church in Hungary, whose
leadership became a subsidiary
of the Hungarian communist
party; the thorough penetration
of the Vatican by Warsaw Pact intelligence agencies (to the benefit
of communist negotiators); and the undercutting
of Catholic leaders in Poland and in what was
then Czechoslovakia.
Just a few off the top
of my head: — it can become an obligation for the «employed» and an expectation for the «employers»... both
parties settle on this expectation usually (that is his / their job to learn directly from God, and
then pass it on to us; he is the «Lord's annointed» servant, we are under his care / guidance /
leadership / authority.
For in 1938 Trotsky also claimed that the only thing stopping the global revolution was «the crisis
of proletarian
leadership»: namely the weak - kneed vacillators that led both social democratic and communist
parties then and now.
However, if the
leadership perceives that an oppositional figure outside the Communist
Party might be emerging, or there is a social movement that seems to threaten the one - party system, or evidence of ethnic unrest, then the security apparatus will move against that person or g
Party might be emerging, or there is a social movement that seems to threaten the one -
party system, or evidence of ethnic unrest, then the security apparatus will move against that person or g
party system, or evidence
of ethnic unrest,
then the security apparatus will move against that person or group.
Then there are those amongst the
party's rank - and - file who occasionally crop up to embarrass the
leadership, like councillor David Silvester, who, earlier this year, claimed that recent flooding had been the result
of the government's legalisation
of gay marriage.
Maybe this is his strategy — stay out
of the last
leadership race — it's likely to produce a dud, get the position
of party chairman, make challenging powerful speeches and articles (he has identified the English democratic defecit, Toque, in his New Statesman article, which is about the best on the issue from any MP see: http://www.newstatesman.com/uk-politics/2010/08/labour-
party-english-england), make more
of a public name for himself,
then stand when the prospects
of victory are real.
Then get a transplant,» was but the first
of various interventions he made during the
party's protracted
leadership campaign — interventions that weren't just counter-productive, but also rather disingenuous.
Of course people can express their dissent and we can have that policy debate and then we'll arrive at a democratic decision and then we expect people to unite in the interests of the party and the country overall what to what we don't expect is people going to the media two days before polling to say there is going to be a coup against the leadershi
Of course people can express their dissent and we can have that policy debate and
then we'll arrive at a democratic decision and
then we expect people to unite in the interests
of the party and the country overall what to what we don't expect is people going to the media two days before polling to say there is going to be a coup against the leadershi
of the
party and the country overall what to what we don't expect is people going to the media two days before polling to say there is going to be a coup against the
leadership.
«Independent Democrat» is not a recognized political
party in New York State, so members
of the IDC run as Democrats, but
then support Republican
leadership once elected.
Asked about which possible Labour
leadership contenders people felt warmest towards, Greenberg said David Miliband was the favourite, followed by his brother, Ed, the likely candidate from the left
of the
party Jon Cruddas, and
then the former schools secretary Ed Balls.
If Corbyn does lose
then I think this will be down to how much people dislike Corbyn's
leadership and his public perception rather than the ideas in this manifesto, but do you think that the more right - leaning aspects
of the
party will use this to attempt to sweep away all the Corbyn policies that are proposed in this manifesto in a bid to be seen as «more electable» when the next election comes around?
At least
then we have control
of the
party rather than giving it back to the Blairites with barely a fight as they wont make the mistake
of putting up a left candidate in the next
leadership election.
[109] The Labour
Party held a
leadership election, in which Jeremy Corbyn,
then a member
of the Socialist Campaign Group, [110] was considered a fringe hopeful when the contest began, receiving nominations from just 36 MPs, one more than the minimum required to stand, and the support
of just 16 MPs.
Today, however, such a system is not commonly practiced and most parliamentary system
parties» rules provide for a
leadership election in which the general membership
of the
party is permitted to vote at some point in the process (either directly for the new leader or for delegates who
then elect the new leader in a convention), though in many cases the
party's legislators are allowed to exercise a disproportionate influence in the final vote.
If the election had revealed a fundamental misunderstanding
of the electorate
then the race for the Labour
leadership uncovered a total disconnect between pundits and the main opposition
party.
2007 did us no favours, and if I was a potential
leadership candidate I'd even think about asking some
of my supporters to nominate McDonnell regardless
of whether they
then voted for him, to make sure I was viewed as having been elected properly in a contest where all sections
of the
party had been included.
Until the
party and its
leadership can admit to the mistakes made in government, or to the lack
of courage shown in not tackling the clear problems that prevent ordinary people from enjoying the sort
of life that the middle classes take for granted,
then I fear a whole swathe
of Labour supporters will simply choose not to vote Labour, whatever promises are made at the next election (this is essentially ditching the last vestiges
of New Labour I suppose).
«If you thought the way to become leader
of the Labour
party was to follow a very defined route,
then all
of a sudden Jeremy Corbyn winning the
leadership election on the route you're not meant to take - it tips it all on its head, doesn't it.
At that time, if the
party's
leadership decides to blindly and conveniently throw its weight behind an incumbent Mr. Addison, Mr. Nortey could
then decide to go independent and win the massive support and sympathy
of those who watched him play decently by the rules the season before.
He equally declared that if Daniel is elected and chosen as the next Chairman
of the
party, regarded as the largest in Africa,
then it would be easy for it to take over the mantle
of leadership in the country in 2019 and restore the hope
of teeming Nigerians, who he said were tired
of the maladministration
of the All Progressives Congress - led Federal Government.
Last year, Times reporter David Gonzalez wrote about how Jimenez, a longtime Bronx activist, was critical
of Assemblyman and
then - Democratic County Chair Jose Rivera who was facing challenges to his
leadership of the
party.
If, however, the
party leadership is more concerned with the composition
of the post-election parliamentary
party - and the potential
of getting a bloc
of left - wingers who will nominate a left - wing successor to Corbyn —
then removing a vocal critic
of the
leadership like Danczuk may be the over-riding consideration.
• If those who have been working to destabilise Corbyn's
leadership such as Tony Blair, Rupert Murdoch, Neil Kinnock, Peter Mandelson etc, and MPs such as Angela Eagle now succeed in their coup,
then I predict a wholesale move
of existing Labour supporters (myself included) to the Greens and electoral losses for the remaining «Labour
party» that will eclipse even those suffered by the Lib Dems in the last general election.
And
then, increasing support for smaller
parties, from our first Green MP in Brighton to Respect's revival in Bradford, create a myriad
of further challenges to the national
leadership sought by David Cameron and Ed Miliband.
For Labour
Party people who look to their leaders for a political lead, what
then have each
of our
leadership candidate got to say about yesterday's hugely significant event?
Green
Party co-leader Caroline Lucas
then took aim at May for staying at home, saying: «I think the first rule
of leadership is to show up.»
The
party went on to win the first two elections
of the fourth republic under the
leadership of then Chairman Rawlings.
There will also be a system or registered supporters, people who are not full members
of the Labour
Party, who can also
then take part in those
leadership elections.
She recalled that the recent Supreme Court judgement, which recognised the
then Caretaker Committee led by Senator Ahmed Makarfi as the authentic
leadership of the PDP, laid to rest any claim
of divisions in the
party.
Then, in the Labour
Party leadership election, these vicious degenerates deliberately humiliated Woman
of our Times, Liz Kendall.
Once in Parliament, she appeared to sign up to the Eurosceptic - wing
of the
party, first supporting Michael Howard
then William Hague for the Conservative
leadership.
Assuming there will be a
leadership election and assuming Corbyn wins (two large assumptions I appreciate because it is not in the interest
of the plotters to run in an election they are likely to lose and anything might happen in the campaign if and when it comes)
then the opportunity to renew the
party is now there.
While a handful
of Brexit - supporting Labour MPs would back the government, if the
party leadership signalled to MPs to vote against it because Labour was now more sympathetic to a customs union as an end point,
then Theresa May would be in danger
of losing.
I would
then Classify the views
of Cooper to be much more in line with the «Socially Liberal, pro EU» Labour member / supporter who's views don't currently fit in with the Labour
leadership of Jeremy Corbyn, but more with the «Core vote, possible Libdem» voter who could be attracted to a new centre
party.
Mr Miliband said future
leadership contests would be decided by a one member, one vote election which would mean union members could pay # 3 to affiliate to Labour and
then get a
leadership vote which would be equal to that
of full members
of the
party.