Sentences with phrase «then let him play»

«They're patient, they're deliberate, and they know how to establish smart processes then let them play out.»

Christians have a right to influence society — if the majority think abortion should be restricted, then let it play out!

If the Adelina's of the world portray people not christian as evil and wish to do christians harm, then lets play the part..

if we are going to get beat 4 - 0 then lets play those players who want to play and especially the ones we have bought recently to make the team better..!

Then lets play players out of position, monreal is a lb only, chambers better at cb or dm, mertesacker needs getting off the pitch and not on the bench either.

To try to control the amount of paint he played with, I took a paper plate with a bunch of paint on it and dipped his hands into it, then let him play.

Then I let them play!

Then let him play for a little while.

Those two do that for a few days and then I let them play together.

Another approach is to tape the family talking and then let that play.

Speaking with German website Gamestar, Tim Willits confirmed that RAGE 2 will not feature lootboxes, joking that the team is doing something new, letting players buy the game and then letting them play it.

Not exact matches

If your hands get tired in this mode, you can slide the Joy - Cons up and off (a tiny release button behind each lets them disengage), prop the Switch on a flat surface with its rear kickstand, then continue playing wirelessly, your hands free to roam like creatures loosed from cages.

You could let your team do that, but then who would be playing the game?

Then he let slip that Play - Doh had approached him multiple times, offering him half a million for his idea, which is protected by a provisional patent!

Super Mario Maker lets fans design levels in four different Super Mario styles, then play those levels and upload them for others to play.

Then, ask yourself if you have been planning the trades (accepting risk), and then trading the plans (executing)... or have you frequently been failing to just let the original trade setups play Then, ask yourself if you have been planning the trades (accepting risk), and then trading the plans (executing)... or have you frequently been failing to just let the original trade setups play then trading the plans (executing)... or have you frequently been failing to just let the original trade setups play out?

Let's first look at a simple fact and then run some numbers to see how it plays out in the real world.

Well if that is our destiny and faith then let it be but by applying such acts on the populations by those Political Parties playing their dirty games is not Islamic at all and if that what is applied by those Muslim to Muslim then what can you non Muslims expect to be treated at any other MidEast country?!

Let me ask you, do you stir up controversy for controversies sake and then play the good guy card.

If there is a God and there is just as much for as against, But lets say there is a God and he made everything Including you and He gets to make the rules because lets face it hes a lot bigger then you, So unfortunately he only wants those who believe in him based on the information given, Lets look at the facts based on the Book,, Some of his own angels turned on him and they see him every day... That had to hurt, So he decides With man he only wants those with the faith to believe based on His book and faith found thru the holy spirit, If you refuse to believe then he cant use you, cant trust you, so he will choose to toss you aside, Hey I understand It ai nt fair, Your important, Your Smart, But unfortunately hes bigger then you and he has the Juice, You either play by the rules or wait and see what not believing leads lets say there is a God and he made everything Including you and He gets to make the rules because lets face it hes a lot bigger then you, So unfortunately he only wants those who believe in him based on the information given, Lets look at the facts based on the Book,, Some of his own angels turned on him and they see him every day... That had to hurt, So he decides With man he only wants those with the faith to believe based on His book and faith found thru the holy spirit, If you refuse to believe then he cant use you, cant trust you, so he will choose to toss you aside, Hey I understand It ai nt fair, Your important, Your Smart, But unfortunately hes bigger then you and he has the Juice, You either play by the rules or wait and see what not believing leads lets face it hes a lot bigger then you, So unfortunately he only wants those who believe in him based on the information given, Lets look at the facts based on the Book,, Some of his own angels turned on him and they see him every day... That had to hurt, So he decides With man he only wants those with the faith to believe based on His book and faith found thru the holy spirit, If you refuse to believe then he cant use you, cant trust you, so he will choose to toss you aside, Hey I understand It ai nt fair, Your important, Your Smart, But unfortunately hes bigger then you and he has the Juice, You either play by the rules or wait and see what not believing leads Lets look at the facts based on the Book,, Some of his own angels turned on him and they see him every day... That had to hurt, So he decides With man he only wants those with the faith to believe based on His book and faith found thru the holy spirit, If you refuse to believe then he cant use you, cant trust you, so he will choose to toss you aside, Hey I understand It ai nt fair, Your important, Your Smart, But unfortunately hes bigger then you and he has the Juice, You either play by the rules or wait and see what not believing leads too.

Since you bring up the bears attacking children in your comment several times, let me ask you... If some children today were out playing in the woods and they got attacked by bears, and then a pastor said that those children got attacked by bears because they were not respectful toward him, what would you think about this incident?

Also, lets legally purchase land in Iraq and then lets the international uproar if we build a baseball diamond in Baghdad and have the Yankees and the Mets play their subway series there.

CNN hunts the globe and finds every backwards, hillbilly christian who is a jerk and then reports it like this is who we are!!!! You know two can play that game... lets go looking in the gay community closet and see what we find... hmmmm

To use a different metaphor, life for me is a two - step saraband of creating and letting be, of making and simply enjoying, of molding and then being molded, of work and play, prayer and politics, telling and listening.

To all of you who don't believe... lets play a game for a moment... if your right... then we all die... no coming of God... BUT... WHAT IF THERE IS A GOD... DO YOU WANT TO STAND UP ON JUDGEMENT DAY AND BET YOUR ETERNITY ON THIS?

If all he wants to do is bitch and moan then he certainly is playing a game, and I don't have time for that... never did, never will... but I'd rather give someone the benefit of the doubt than let someone slip by undealt with.

And if you are set on playing with your dolls, and want me to join in, then I will pretend to cry and let you put me to bed.

OK, then lets see articles about the rest of the GOP's candidate's beliefs... and the DEMs certainly play the moral high ground as well.

If the preaching of the Church would address the whole man then let the imagination play over the facts and awaken tired spirits.

He added: «If this doesn't disturb us collectively as Plateau people, then let's keep playing the ostrich as they forcefully take Plateau state inch by inch, day by day.»

Let us agree, then, that Religion, occupying herself with personal destinies and keeping thus in contact with the only absolute realities which we know, must necessarily play an eternal part in human history.

Since ice cream lets you easily taste and then adjust as you're going along, it's easy to play around with amounts here.

Its looking like he is building a new team I support Mr wenger why sell sachez now for 40 million while his replacement will cost us 80 million we need to get players of good quality first and then we can let go and I am sure if a club comes in with 80 million for sanchez Mr wenger will go for it savilla keep the ball well and circulates the ball well so many back passes to retain position they play a shape of 3331 and very close there was no gaps and they were not afraid to dig in to our players I must admit i like their system....

Southampton refused to let Morgan Schneiderlin go, but then he played every game he was fit to play.

Lets play Southampton in the FA Cup, then we can think about Watford.

The guy had a great game v west ham but his ego lets him down, but Wenger his comments on the defensive cock ups, it is the same comments on all the losses so surely he needs to rectify the prob Number one drop the BF German that can't head a ball can't run he is a liability every time he puts on the shirt even Debuchy jumps higher than him Gibbs can't defend he is a nice guy but not first choice L Back Chocqelen has proved he is a good player that can get better what we need is an Ozil type midfielder that has more guts to play good balls through to runners not high balls that you hope will find a target So a defender that can defend a left back and a midfielder and then look out enough is enough on what the problems are If the car won't run right you Fix it Wenger now is the time to FIX it CB

clutching at a charity shield like it means something is sad - poldi is our bench, diaby does nt exist, lets see what happens when we play city in the league - then we can talk

If he wants to play cf then let him go.

Now if the plan is to start Parra and just have Dahl be bench depth (a mistake based on salary only), then yes send him to AAA and let him get consistent ABs and playing time.

obviously I would prefer to have a much more suitable alternative in the defensive midfielder positions but if they focused more on defensive end and the occasional long - ball, this would allow Bellerin and Sead ample opportunities to bomb forward on their respective wings while still having enough cover to maintain their defensive shape... it would likewise allow for overlapping runs on both wings, thereby letting both Sanchez and Perez to cut inside and get shots away in and around the top of the box with their most dominant feet... if goals were needed I would sub Bellerin for OX and bring Ramsey in for Elneny then switch to a 3 -2-4-1 (more of a 3 -1-5-1 with Ramsey playing higher up the pitch) and I would only use Giroud as a sub when the game dictated it for tactical reasons... this would allow us to be a high energy team with incredible link - up play and a much more direct approach in the offensive end

Reading the thread on this article and I noticed a lot of people naming strikers we could have gotten in past transfer windows that have gone to other club and failed, Balotelli, Falcao, Martinez, Boney etc are recurring names in all the comments, and am sat here thinking because they failed in thee clubs does not necessarily mean they would have failed if we had pulled out our fingers and hot them back then, Balotelli aside I strongly believe all of these players could have made a difference playing infront of our midfield and given the kind of attention and care Wenger gives Giroud and Walcott, adapting our play to suit them and giving them chances after chances even when its blatantly obvious they are average players so please lets not keep using that as an excuse for Wenger's ultra careful attitude in the transfer market, they could have failed with us, or they could have been massive for us, all speculations.

He was mainly played as a LB since moving to Schalke but didn't set the world on fire until his contract had a year left to run down on it, hence his old club failing to renew it in time, that was basically because he was mediocre before then and were probably thinking to let him go.

Plus if you play Rosicky over let's say Wilshere, then Wilshere is less able to develop and progress as a player due to a lack of game time.

Every player wants to play and if Wenger can't guarantee him play time (atleast in FA cup) then he should let him go.

The sensible thing to do would be to buy Carvalho for # 37M (insert any # 25M + CDM who is an upgrade and is better according to fan wisdom than FC), bench Coquelin who then says to Wenger «well I did my best, the fans don't rate me, I need to play and if that is not good enough then best let me leave — not interested in being benched», Wenger being the gent lets him go in January and Arteta moves back up to second choice.

If wenger tries his usual Amc on the left wing against chelsea, then he is mad.Although prandelli made a mistake playing the 3 -5-2 formation in the first half against such pace in the arsenal side which clearly showed but lets not take anything away from the boys tonight.

i think the done deal for lemar is good to as fans who play game with mouth am almost happy plz wenger you can also do another deal of mahrez who is ready to play for as then let sanchez go

It's a shame really, we were known as the best attacking team in the league at one point then through Wenger's delusion we don't even play good football let alone winning by big margin.

Let the club think about the cost, if they're willing to buy either Cavani or Reus then as a fan I'd love to see either play for this team.

If your gonna let them play physical then stay with that format.