Sentences with phrase «then made it a reality»

And then they made it a reality, while still in college, mind you.

Entertain this fantasy and then make it a reality for your next Kauai vacation.

We tweak it to fit what we both like (which is more or less the same stuff) and then he makes it a reality (building, painting, etc).

Not exact matches

The tech giant unsuccessfully attempted to buy Snapchat multiple times, and since then, the Los Angeles app has been on a rampage making social media fun again with features like stickers, augmented reality lenses and neat geofilters.

Then Krzanich quickly moved onto his prepared remarks, including announcements of deals with Ferrari and Nissan for self - driving car components, as well as a partnership with Paramount Pictures to make virtual reality videos.

If you thought you were going to make $ 100,000 and drive a Porsche immediately out of college, then your standards of success were skewed and superficial, you confused your pleasure for happiness, and the painful smack of reality hitting you in the face will be one of the best lessons life ever gives you.

Why, then, as a young person, would you not be confident in your ability to make whatever your idea is become reality?

Then, he or she gets to work, trying to make that impossible dream a reality.

«The reality is that writing code and building a product and then building a company actually is not a glamorous enough thing to make a movie about,» Zuckerberg explained.

If you have a bigger vision for your life, and you have the desire to make your dreams — and the dreams of others — a reality, then selling a business may very well be an important step onto reaching your big goals.

«If you make a mistake there, then you're impacting the consumer, and today's new reality is you can't afford to do that,» he said in a recent interview at the company's headquarters in Oakville, Ont.

And then there's 100 acres that would be a perfect place for them to make their vision a reality.»

Perfecting the art of listening, then, makes the illusion of communication a tangible reality.

[The real weapon of Satan is too trick us into thinking «everything's ok»] so, if we think everything is ok, then we live in a [reality outside of the one God has made for us.]

If such a cosmic battle is not an ongoing reality, then Santorum (and any similarly believing Christian) would be making a serious logical error.

And, in reality, unless an effort is made to remove the effects of brainwashing (which obviously hasn't happened in your case), then the effects can actually last indefinitely.

We build up a simplified model of reality by making assumptions about how the world works, and then we try to assume everything away apart from that specific issue we are focusing on.

If you don't like a comment... then you simply make up a reality of your own choosing that is supposed to reflect our beliefs in some fashion and attack it.

If your conclusion is anything but religion is harmful to the world as a whole, both its population and the planet itself, no matter how it makes you feel inside then i fear you have completely lost your grip on reality

Even with the addition of a video and keeping this story on the front page all weekend, she STILL makes the logical mistake of saying «here is what I have decided is the reality of the situation» (a reality which is HEAVILY debatable, especially in light of recent neurological research) and then went looking for whatever philosophy was the closest match for her preconceived determination of reality.

If religious belief is attained when reason makes a «total response of the total being to what is apprehended as the ultimate reality,» such that in this act reason is reborn, then it follows that those who totally accept a given world - view as ultimate, whether it be theistic or non-theistic, naturalistic or supernaturalistic, immanentist or transcendentalist, as normative for their entire lives and as the supreme value in their hierarchy of values, and hence not taken as a means but as an end, belong to the religious dimension.

Then the two questions impinge on each other: How does whatever it is that makes this school «theological» shape or modify its concrete reality as a school?

Then, Jesus is in no sense making a moral valuation or announcing a divine intervention or a coming judgment; he simply describes the reality of what is happening.

If one means, for instance, an epistemological privilege of the oppressed, in the sense that the poor, the suffering and the dispossessed have some intuitive knowledge of God, righteousness and social reality not available to others; if one means that victims know best how to overcome their condition and build new institutions; and if one means that knowledge based on «experience» makes academic excellence unnecessary, then liberation thought and the Social Gospel diverge.

They took a popular hippie revolutionary named jesus, made him a martyr, and then created a book of Harry Potter proportions to sell to the masses who find it easier to swallow than reality.

If you think humans were born of a giant snake and want to make that the reality that everyone subscribes to, then you have to bring a lot of compelling evidence to contradict the mountain of evidence of natural selection.

References to passages in Process and Reality will be made by following the customary model adopted in Griffin and Sherburne's edition, that is by page (s) then line (s).

If non-believers fail to speak out against procedures that have no basis in reality, e.g. exorcism, and someone dies that could have been saved, then they missed an opportunity to make one person's life a little bit longer and this world a little bit better.

When one consciously uses concrete language to make the abstract visible or to interpret one concrete reality into another, then one is purposefully using metaphorical language.

I've never heard so much double talk, and beating around the bush, and saying two divergent things at the same time, and making one explanation, then changing it 180 when someone else makes a comment that is grounded in reality.

For one thing if Cod has created our minds as well as the rest of reality, then it makes sense to believe that God may communicate with us in nature as well as in Scripture, even if as «through a glass darkly.»

If our human existence is not that of some supposedly substantial and indestructible soul to whom experiences happen, but is rather those experiences themselves held together in unity and given identity by the awareness and self - awareness which makes it possible for us to say «I» and «you», then the enduring reality, which God accepts and values, is precisely that series of events or occasions which go to make us what we are.

According to Berry, if only we all grew up in such conditions of a Jeffersonian freehold whereby stewardship of the land was a reality to make for republicanism then we would all be okay.

If we comprehend ourselves in the God - world fullness in which we live, then we recognize that «to realize God» means to make the world ready to be a place of God's reality.

If the truth has made us «odd,» if we have not accommodated ourselves out of all recognition, then it will appear to some people that we're running away, that we're living an escapist existence, that we're outsiders, even outlaws — whereas the truth is that we're the insiders, because we're bearing God's reality, not the world's.

Reality what makes Crossan more qualified to write about the historical Jesus 2000 years removed then Matthew, John, and Peter who live side by side with him?

If we can really understand the magnificence of this sacrifice done on our behalf, then the reality of that gift transforms us and makes want to serve and please him.

It should not be surprising then that Whitehead thought of God as a single actual entity immune to the possibility of loss.59 At least William Christian sees this as the proper Whiteheadian view.60 Nevertheless, Christian's position is challenged by Ivor Leclerc, who argues, in agreement with Hartshorne, that Christian's conclusion is incompatible with the categoreal scheme elaborated in chapter two of Process and Reality.61 Here, according to Leclerc, Whitehead «makes clear» that the category of «subjective perishing» is «necessarily applicable to every actual entity whatever, including God.»

Instead, associates want clear direction for the areas of ministry over which they have charge, and then they want to be left alone «to make the church's vision a reality» in that area.

Now, not only am I going to create this species, then I'm going to keep my eye on iit (reality show style) so that I can make sure that they do the «right» thing.

Try spending a few years in reality and then show us how YOU have made the world a better place.

Only so, it would seem, was the certitude of orthodoxy attained; when questions of his reality and his nature had been honestly met, then, and then only, could the best thinkers affirm: «All the gods of the nations are vanities; but the Lord made the heavens» (Ps.

If you ever attempt (and a few have) to use any of the stories mention in the bible as a test of scientific theory and then use them in court for defense, by invoking the angel Satan made me do it, or God said so, then who are you to say «He's lying», in short mold the fantasy into your reality.

Indeed, for these thinkers the Logos was something real, perhaps transcendent of the cosmos, but if so then also immanent within it, making it to be what it is and drawing reality to itself as an end or telos.

The problem is that people think these things really happened and then we have religious fanatics who can't discern metaphoric made up stories from reality.

Jesus was not announcing a future event or referring to a future order when he spoke of the kingdom; he was referring to an eternal Reality which, nevertheless, was then and there making itself known — that is, was present and active within history — in a way both unprecedented and unduplicable.

He writes,» [Whitehead's] argument then makes the second and crucial point that this sense of reality which underlies all our experience comprises infinitely more than is sometimes supposed....

Shadowflash, I don't recall your response to any of my posts... I usually do recall them... But I do agree with one thing you said... «human mind hates being wrong» But I see it differently then you do... I see human mind and human understanding being the stumbling block and point of pride, which prevents man from seeing the reality of his real condition, and the need to humble himself in order to be able to see himself as he is, and seek the help of His Creator without whom he is a living, moving shell, yet, without the vital part of him being alive, which would make him complete.

And if revelation means the arrival of the future into the opening that our hope makes in the fragile fabric of the present, then our acceptance of this revelation is consistent with the critical demand that we face reality.

Ford's proposal implies that Whitehead had abandoned such views between the publication of Religion in the Making and the composition of Process and Reality, and that he then had reverted to the concept of God as formative element that he had developed in the first three parts of Religion in the Making.