To determine a mineral's specific gravity, it is necessary to weigh a sample (using grams),
then measure its volume (in cubic centimeters).
Not exact matches
When I originally came up with the recipe, I
measured everything in cups, and
then I weighed out those
volume measurements.
When I first created the recipe, I used
volume measurements, and to get the weights I
measured out each ingredient, placed it on the scale, recorded the amount in ounces, and
then hit the kg / lb button which
then gave me the weight in grams.
If you are
measuring by
volume, put a tablespoon of whole wheat or rye flour in each
measuring cup,
then fill them with white flour.
I
measured everything by
volume and
then weighed each ingredient to see how they matched up.
When you're making the 1 pound (500 g) loaf, if you can't find small eggs, beat 2 large eggs until blended,
then measure 1/4 cup + 2 teaspoons (70 mL) to equal the
volume of 2 small eggs, reserving any remaining egg for another use.
Measuring about 68 miles (110 kilometers) across, the caldera is deep enough to hold the entire
volume of water in Lake Huron, and
then some.
Then, they used computer - based analyses to
measure changes in gray matter
volume.
The length and width of each nodule were
measured with pixels and
then converted to millimeters to calculate the tumor
volume.
Later in the day, Mr. Sutherland explains the concept of displacement, and how students can
measure the
volume of an object by first
measuring a container of water, putting an object in it, and
then re-
measuring the water to determine the change in
volume.
You don't need a
measuring device to discover that it pulls harder than the GTO; every sustained surge of boost brings a crazed whooshing noise — like a recording of paper being ripped and
then replayed much louder — as the sheer
volume of ingested and recirculated air comprehensively muffles any exhaust noise.
On the other hand, if you have strange dreams about nailing the perfect run and spending hours hunched over a piece of grid paper planning optimal routes,
then rejoice:
Volume takes that pared - down formula, pares it down, and
then pares it down again for good
measure.
If you're not refuting the
volume analysis,
then I can't see how you can say focusing on ice
volume is «a bit funky» — it's clearly a more important
measure of the system's ability to recover, which is the central point of this post.
If you make the parcels of gas small enough,
then you reach a scale where «temperature» as an average
measure of energy breaks down, where the tiny parcels of gas are constantly «heating» or «cooling» a tiny bit in the sense that the
volume in question gains or loses a bit of energy during the random motion of the molecules.
In fact you could argue that you should subtract 3 times the GIA from the satellite
measured level, because if the seabed sinks 0.3 mm
then the land should raise 1 mm, because the Earth has the same
volume.
Concerning
volume: If it's not taken by IPCC (I did not read the draft and also, there will surely be modifications)
then for the simple reason, that it can not be
measured directly and so any data have a pretty wide uncertainty bar and are open to attack.
Worked directly with Division VP and Controller to optimize business drivers, and
then built a robust monthly reporting regimen that
measured all aspects of P&L and variance drivers including
volume, rate, and mix.