Sentences with phrase «then money left over»

While the person has enough income to live off of and then money left over they make the decision to purchase an insurance policy that will serve the purpose to leave a sizable inheritance to their heirs.

If the corporation will use the deposit, the owner must receive an estimate within 20 days and then any money left over and a final statement must be given to the owner within 60 days after receiving the estimate.

Not exact matches

Fredrick Petrie, author of «The End of Work: Financial Planning for People With Better Things To Do,» recommends «taxing» yourself in order to get more money out of your wallet and into the bank — this way you'll make savings a priority from the get - go, rather than budgeting everything else first and then seeing what is left over for savings.

If you have money left over, then maybe it's time to reinvest in the market.

As Wallerstein sees it, there's only one for corporations: «The way the IRS's rules are set up for health - care reimbursement FSAs, an employee could decide to contribute, say, $ 2,000 over the course of a year, spend that money on medical procedures during the first two months of the year, and then quit, leaving his company holding the bag for any funds that hadn't yet been deducted from his paycheck.»

If your hope is to have some money left over for your children or beneficiaries to inherit, then you'll want to pay attention to your trusts.

Since then, he's run over a dozen websites of his own, and is a frequent consultant to some of the biggest online marketers in the business, where he shows them how to capture the vast sums of money they're leaving on the table.

Then the money I have left over, I invest in my Vanguard brokerage account.

It then subtracts that figure from your income to find your residual income (e.g.; your money «left over» each month).

Such sacrifices include money spent on fulltime childcare and viewing it as an investment in the earning potential of her career over the long term, compared to leaving then returning to the workforce.

If you stuck to the safest rate over the course of a non-worst-case-in-history scenario then you left money unspent.

Will you have enough money left over each month to save enough to launch the business, and then to get you through tough times if the business struggles?

And then we feel the prompting of the Holy Spirit, convicting us to give to God the way He intended, and we find ourselves scratching our heads, wondering how on earth we could fin any money left over to give to accomplish God's will in the world.

Because the Rangers are paying Cole Hamels something less than Ian Kennedy money, they can then take the savings and have themselves an international - signing blowout one of these years, replacing the prospects they lost in the trade, and still have several millions left over.

So to re-cap, if AFC change the board, get new ownership, change the business model, change the manager (or give him an updated training manual), reduce the ticket prices, don't sell any players who want to leave, only buy or sell players sanctioned by the fans, spend # 65 - 85M this window, stop negotiating on transfer fees but just hand over the money then we will win the PL and UCL on a regular basis and this particular supporter will be happy.

Combined with the fact that there are fears over Danny Rose moving to Manchester City in a deal worth # 50m this summer, Spurs could be in the market for a new left - back and if Shaw is available, then the whole situation could make sense as it would see them make money and bring in a player in desperate need of a confidence boost to get back to being the top player many believed he would become.

here is the big truth... sanchez out miki in would leave us with a weaker best 11 than the start of the window... and a close rival stronger... with money in the bank from Walcott and coquelin the only winner would be the owner and his overpaid mouthpiece... on motd yday he says nothing happening with PMA then we hear about a silly underbid... whole thing looking like deja vu all over again

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

the club had an 80 million war chest to spend on top of its profit last summer, thats not taking into consideration how much was left over from the summer before, and they then had an injection of cash from the BT sports deal of circa 120 million on top of the 80 million so, where did that vast sum of money go?

Be sure to factor all of this into your budget so that you do not spend all of your money on the dress and then not have anything left over for the other accessories.

I meet my x on line after being on my own for more then 12 years I was very much looking forward to starting out a new life with her but little did I know she had a x boy friend in the back ground, at the time I was working at my job I had for more then 42 years My story is I was robed of my penshion money After I has spent all of it in her home over 50» 000 pounds Now I am left homeless

This game got way over criticized to the point I think a lot of gamers are becoming as disillusioned as IGN, because its actually a fun game with a pinch of Resident Evil nostalgia set in a what if universe and the game is like a cross between gears of war and left 4 dead, so maybe its a tad bit buggy, but its still a fun game and if you paid 10 or so bucks then you got moneys worth for sure, so don't pay attention to all the haters, because they probably drink the Bill Gates kool aid.

And then, like you say, if it's split over the next three years for example, you are left with not very much money.

So when I went to the SF section I'd skip from publisher to publisher, then go back over the others if I had any money left.

If you elect to use the life - expectancy method, you can stretch out the required withdrawals over a number of years and leave what's left in the account at your death to your heirs, who would then owe tax as they withdraw the money.

Then, since you won't receive any CESG money for contributions above $ 2,000 a year, you might start an informal trust with any educational savings left over.

I then tackled my other loans and continued the process of prioritizing the highest interest and where I had some additional money left over after bills / rent, I paid some of the difference towards my loans.

In the rare cases if there is money left over, then those funds can be rolled into an RRSP.

Then with the money left over, you can budget for food, gas, clothes and other variables.

Then, pay all your other bills immediately so you can't spend that money on something else, so you can see immediately how much you have left over from each paycheck to pay biweekly toward your student debt.»

You need to list all the expenses you have each month and then subtract them from your monthly after - tax income, if you have any 100 % disposable income left over then it's OK to use that money to trade with.

I suggest that traders sit down and map out all their finances before they begin trading with real money; from investments, to bills, to debt, map it all out and then decide how much «fun money» or disposable income you have left over.

If there is any money left over after these charges have been paid, your school will then distribute them back to you in order to use for other education expenses you might have.

So, then they end up with a consolidation loan, now they find they have some extra money left over every month because of the cash flow improvement and they don't change their spending habits.

It then subtracts that figure from your income to find your residual income (e.g.; your money «left over» each month).

The rest of the money you have left over from your bills can then be divided amongst entertainment, such as going out to eat or the movies.

Corporations, then, will have less money left over for all of the other aspects of their businesses; servicing debts will require more and more of the revenue that they generate.

If there is any money left over after the fees are paid, then your school will issue you a refund for the overage.

Granted, many studies show that a lot of individual investors would actually be best off if they left their money in index funds over investing themselves, but then again, index funds don't reward you with the next 1000 % return growth stock or provide the investing options available in a typical employer sponsored plan or index fund.

If there is no money left over at the end of the month to dedicate toward debt, then you can use the tool to analyze categories where you should cut spending to free up cash to settle debts.

If you have money left over, then you can think about using this money to pay debts off quicker or putting it into savings.

If there's any money left over, then the owner (s) of the second mortgage gets paid.

If you listen to personal finance guru's like Dave Ramsey and Suze Orman, they repeatedly tell you to invest enough to get your company's 401k match, then max out a Roth IRA and only then (if there is any money left over) invest any additional money you can in your company's 401K up to the maximum annual contribution limit (currently $ 17,000).

If you are cash insolvent (if you don't have enough money to meet your credit commitments as they fall due) but you have money left over before paying anything towards your unsecured debts each month, then it is likely that you will have a few more options available to you.

If you don't have money left over or are negative - then start to make tough calls and cut some expenses out of your life to make your balance budget.

Then the money I have left over, I invest in my Vanguard brokerage account.

Those times that the adoption fee may leave a bit left over, that money is then used to cover the other dogs in their care.

1) buy today's hardware, build a computer center, and run for five years, with a large staff, or 2) take the same amount of money, go to Bermuda for four years to party, then spend what's left over on a fast computer and do the same project in one year on your desktop.

People that used to know the departed would come over to bow to the coffin, leave some money for the family, then join the rest of the guests nearby for a giant, homemade meal.

So it's a book that focuses really on how you manage your cash flow and using human behavior, and basically coming up with a certain set of accounts that you break your money in, and that you as a business owner start taking a little bit of profit immediately, pay yourself immediately, and then whatever's left over is what you spend on your business, right?