Sentences with phrase «then move the price»

Not exact matches

If we can get the cost of moving to Mars to be roughly equivalent to a median house price in the US, which is around $ 200,000, then I think the probability of establishing a self - sustaining civilization is very high.

Discussing the move higher, then lower, in crude prices after tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia, with Anthony Grisanti, GRZ Energy President.

Our strategy is to start with a high - price, low - volume car and then move down to a lower price, higher volume.

Silver tends to lag the gold price behavior so this means traders can watch how gold develops, and then trade the same, but delayed, move in silver.

The company (and its bankers) would then move down from the top bid until it reached the highest price at which it could sell all the shares it wanted to offer.

Over the coming year, lower energy costs (and other comodity costs) will benefit consumers and as oil prices rise, 80 % of U.S. oil production will move to breakeven then substantial profit.

And then second, with regard to pricing and also in light of the really short volatility we've seen in the commodity complex the last couple of weeks, should we be thinking of your pricing decisions as wholly decoupled from commodity price volatility at this point or is there flexibility to move within the ranges that you've outlined?

If rising prices move these ratios above their long - run averages, then either incomes or rents are likely to rise, or house prices to fall.

Then, in this technical trading commentary published one day later, we stressed why the most profitable swing traders are those who learn to merely react to the market's price action that is presented to them at any give time, rather than those who attempt to predict the direction of the next move.

«If rates go up — and I don't think they will — then the increase in yields would hurt metals and mining company prices as money left these assets and moved into fixed income.»

Its most significant development may be the firm's recent promise to match the prices of its online competition, something the company has yet to offer in the U.S.. It's a move the company hopes will cut down on «showrooming,» where customers go to a store to play with a product, and then go home and buy it for a cheaper price online.

Then, if price moved up to that level we would be filled short...

If the move below the 20 - EMA was just a minor shakeout, then the price action should reclaim the 20 - period EMA within a few hours to a few days, or at the very least set a higher swing low below the 20 - EMA.

A five - day simple moving average, for example, tallies the closing prices for the last five days, and then divides that total by five.

OBV that goes up, then, could be a signal that the price is moving up.

You can make short term profits off of the small dips that a stock will have, such as when Apple dropped down under $ 108 briefly on Friday, but if the true price is higher, then the move upward above $ 110 makes sense.

Moving averages are usually better in obvious trends; you can watch for smaller retracements to the moving averages (exponential moving average or ema) and then look to join the trend from that ema, ideally on a price action signal, but it's not always necessary, especially in very strong tMoving averages are usually better in obvious trends; you can watch for smaller retracements to the moving averages (exponential moving average or ema) and then look to join the trend from that ema, ideally on a price action signal, but it's not always necessary, especially in very strong tmoving averages (exponential moving average or ema) and then look to join the trend from that ema, ideally on a price action signal, but it's not always necessary, especially in very strong tmoving average or ema) and then look to join the trend from that ema, ideally on a price action signal, but it's not always necessary, especially in very strong trends.

However, if the price moves above the $ 4 mark or so, then innovation will be spurred on faster by discontent with a high gas price status quo.

If oil prices ever move up, or stabilize, then we should get to a point of growing dividends (rather than the cuts and suspensions of the past few months).

In February Alberta imposed — then withdrew — a ban on British Columbia wine.Alberta then followed up this threat with a second attack, one that saw Alberta threaten to cut off oil shipments to the West Coast — a move that would send gasoline prices sky - high in Vancouver.While Alberta has yet to stop oil shipments to B.C., but it's threat gained a bit more clout this week.

A simple moving average (SMA) is a simple, or arithmetic, moving average that is calculated by adding the closing price of the security for a number of time periods and then dividing this total by the number of time periods.

For these people, the goal should be to become familiar with how asset prices typically move during those hours and then when possible, take advantage of other optimal time periods.

You should really dedicate yourself to learning all the nuances of one price action setup at a time on the daily charts, once you do this and are making money consistently on a demo account you can then move on to the next price action setup.

The best pin bar setups occur near confluent levels of previous price action as the market moves in one direction and then regresses back to re-test a previous support or resistance level.

If the new business is unrelated then that is a red flag and / or especially if the market price has moved up in anticipation of success.

On the binary options if the price moved down just 0.00001 then you lose everything, i.e. no risk management.

Home price decreases: Interest rates have really just one direction to go, if you assume that home prices will move inversely to interest rates (which is a reasonable assumption), then home prices may definitely decline.

In other words under this leverage we are effectively buying the currency with $ 145161.29 and if the price moves up by 0.00031 then we profit 0.0031 * $ 145161.29 = $ 450.

And following on from that, when the share price moves from closing outside the bands to back inside them, then this usually signals a trend reversal.

Too many traders see a position move to their target price, and then decide to hang on for a few more pennies: after all the stock is hot.

If the price action fails to hold at the 10 - week moving average («A»), then a touch of the uptrend line («B») would also be a very low - risk entry because the prior swing lows are likely to hold.

But if prices have gradually moved to where they are over a long period of time, in response to legitimate secular market forces and conditions, if participants have had sufficient time to grow accustomed to them, to psychologically anchor to them, such that they see them as normal and appropriate, then the basis for questioning their sustainability isn't going to be as strong.

Well personally I think they can't continue to go down forever, but as always, markets can often move further then any of expect in a given direction, and as highlighted at the start of the post nat gas is certainly no stranger to extreme price movements.

But that then merely throws a lifeline to U.S. shale, which could come back to life if oil prices move closer to, say, $ 60 per barrel.

If the trading price is moving against you, then your loss might be higher.

The story goes that traders move through large positions in leveraged exchange - traded funds which then permeate through prices for individual securities.

To put it differently, if it happens that you notice a triangle as the fourth wave, then the traders should put options because after the triangle is broken to the upside in the case of the bullish impulsive move, the markets will make a new high when we compared it to the highs from the third wave and the price will have the tendency to move lower as the new high is being created.

The silver prices have been very buoyant and the breakout through the $ 17 region should prove to be an important development in this market as the bulls try to hold the break and if they manage to, then we should see the prices moving much higher in the medium term.

We should have a bit of coin in the bank for a striker but only in the summer transfer where it's a better market and besides if Bats works out, then he and Zorc can ask Chelsea for a permanent move if the price is right but this is 6 months away.

Yes, we paid Madrids asking price, but even then the player has to agree to a move.

I think Price's signing might have been the best move we made in the offseason from a holistic sense, but then Castillo's has to be the second best at this point.

Don't think it's entirely crazy, although not likely, that they could move back a few spots, grab LVE, move up for the 3T Hurst then move back up if one of the OL (I'm looking at you Billy Price) falls into the late 50s.

Liverpool have reportedly told Besiktas that they will consider a temporary move for Christian Benteke after 26 August if their asking price is not met by then according to Futbol Arena.

I do have my doubts about this rumour, like all of them, especially when you see the money being talked about as nearly # 50 million, but Manolas is one of the top rated defenders in the world and if the price was a little bit less which it could well be as the contract situation with his current club is said to be the reason for the move, then maybe it could happen.

He is a player who we can't afford to lose.The club knows this, the fans know this, and just as importantly so does Mesut Ozil.The fact that he will be in a position to get himself a very nice Signing On Fee from whichever club he signs for after June means he will get the financial rewards he always wanted.Who can blame him for getting the very best for himself.If his abilities had been appreciated by the club and management earlier then the player would have not been in the position we have now where the cards are all held by him.To keep him will cost the club a huge signing on fee and colloidal wages but that is the price we must pay.We need him so pay him provided it is what SVEN M and RAUL advise.Im sure the player himself would be impressed that these 2 are involved and the whole structure of the club is moving forward.

There is no doubt that Cech is a top - of - the - range keeper who could walk into just about any top club in the world, and I think it very unlikely that the bidding would stop at the suggested price of just # 10 million, but then the question arises as to whether Jose Mourinho would allow the Chelsea legend to even move to one of their direct rivals for the Premiership.

could start him on either wing and then move him in to more attacking role... 24m is a steal in this market... hald the price of de bryune or sterling....

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

i think it will be all out for reus (big bid for him coming up me thinks) towards the end of window and cheap under # 10million d / m like tiote or mbia that would probably work for now maybe big money d / m next summer its all about availability like wenger says, the market is slow atm but will pick right up next week all big moves to made from all teams then watch man unted go for it in the market over the top prices and wages the road to bankruptcy hooray!

I think Redknapp moving for Kaboul and Begovic makes sense and if he can get them for a good price then all the better.