Sentences with phrase «then national courts»

Not exact matches

Then in late 2014 he offered her $ 1 billion to surrender her stake in National Amusements, according to court documents.

If the Court were truly to undertake the charge of serving as our national conscience, then the Court would simultaneously lose its legitimacy as a court ofCourt were truly to undertake the charge of serving as our national conscience, then the Court would simultaneously lose its legitimacy as a court ofCourt would simultaneously lose its legitimacy as a court ofcourt of law.

Benito Juárez, supreme court justice and then president, was the liberals» foremost leader and engineer of the 1857 constitution (for which he is now honored by schoolchildren as the first among national heroes).37 Earlier outlawed had been any but «secular» education and the use of civil machinery to enforce religious vows and payment of church tithes.

He was awarded a National Police Bravery Award in 2009 after intervening in a rape and then giving evidence in court.

Last April, I watched the University of South Carolina women's basketball team win the National Championship, celebrate on the court, accept a trophy on a hastily created podium, and then proceed towards the basket in an accepted - but - strange ceremony: cutting down the basketball nets.

The National Adoption Center will review cases on the list over six months and then send files to the Minister of Education for approval before proceeding to court.

My interest in this whole issue comes from the fact that if our law courts especially the highest court in Ghana, Supreme Court that is supposed to be final place in the country to deliver justice to all manner of persons regardless of one's political affiliation, religious beliefs, ethnic background etc in a just and fair manner is now seen to be turning into a place where citizens of Ghana who may belong to certain political affiliations do not feel confident or have trust in their handling of critical national issues in view of some of these «partisan» pronouncements on the part of some justices, then where would we be heading towards as a coucourt in Ghana, Supreme Court that is supposed to be final place in the country to deliver justice to all manner of persons regardless of one's political affiliation, religious beliefs, ethnic background etc in a just and fair manner is now seen to be turning into a place where citizens of Ghana who may belong to certain political affiliations do not feel confident or have trust in their handling of critical national issues in view of some of these «partisan» pronouncements on the part of some justices, then where would we be heading towards as a couCourt that is supposed to be final place in the country to deliver justice to all manner of persons regardless of one's political affiliation, religious beliefs, ethnic background etc in a just and fair manner is now seen to be turning into a place where citizens of Ghana who may belong to certain political affiliations do not feel confident or have trust in their handling of critical national issues in view of some of these «partisan» pronouncements on the part of some justices, then where would we be heading towards as a country?

She has argued 20 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, including a 2009 victory for then - state Attorney General Cuomo to hold national banks responsible for potential racial discrimination in fair - lending laws and a 2001 win upholding congressional campaign expenditure limits.

Justice Adeniyi Ademola of Federal High Court 6 then adjourned the case to Wednesday last week for ruling on the two issues being sought by both prosecution and defence but the court failed to sit on that day because of a seminar organised for judges by the National Judicial Institute (Court 6 then adjourned the case to Wednesday last week for ruling on the two issues being sought by both prosecution and defence but the court failed to sit on that day because of a seminar organised for judges by the National Judicial Institute (court failed to sit on that day because of a seminar organised for judges by the National Judicial Institute (NJI).

«The idea that the leader of the party, having lost the confidence of Labour MPs, then takes the national executive of the party to court is just more dysfunction upon more dysfunction and the party is suffering.

The witness told the court that they wanted the formation of this new group after the then National Chairman of the NPP, Mr Paul Afoko, and the General Secretary, Mr Kwabena Agyapong had organised a meeting which was stopped by the Regional Chairman, Adama Mahama.

We should not be surprised, then, if this weekend sees both the Los Angeles and New York groups throwing their weight behind «The Social Network» — already cast, despite the patronage of a beleaguered middlebrow institution like the National Board of Review, as the cooler, more credible alternative to «The King's Speech» — in a concerted effort to keep the ball in its court.

Since then, she has covered a wide range of topics, including education, tech, local and national politics, development, crime and courts.

In 2012, even as most of our leaders dodged or denied the climate change issue, we were busy tackling it from many angles — reducing carbon emissions by securing national air pollution regulations that clean up or phase out dirty plants and then defending these innovations in court when they are attacked by the polluters.

The Court further reminded that the Qualification Directive (Directive 2011 / 95 / EU) requires the Member States to grant the refugee status when a third country national or a stateless person meets the relevant conditions under that Directive, and then pointed out that «after the application for international protection is submitted in accordance with Chapter II of Directive 2011/95, any third - country national or stateless person who fulfils the material conditions laid down by Chapter III of that directive has a subjective right to be recognised as having refugee status, and that is so even before the formal decision is adopted in that regard».

For example, if you search within the Law.com network, you can then filter results to show only those from the National Law Journal or The American Lawyer, or you can choose to see only results that come from court decisions or blogs.

In her opinion, within the field of application of EU law interpretive standards are fixed by the CJEU, and must then be applied by national courts (including the SCC).

In the event the referring Dutch Supreme Court (Hoge Raad) comes to the conclusion that the national measure is disproportionate, will it then ask the CJEU to answer the remaining questions in a TBG Limited II - case?

If, as with investor state dispute settlement, such a claim would bypass the national courts and thus the preliminary ruling architecture, then the decision of the joint court would constitute an application of the EU law manifested in the withdrawal agreement with a result that would be binding upon the host Member State in question.

Monica Claes and Šejla Imamović then discuss the role of national courts in the new European post-accession fundamental rights architecture and how accession may impact the national courts (p. 160).

If judgment is entered in a U.S. court, it could then be collected from assets of that national government located in the U.S. or under the control of the U.S.

The Luxembourg Court could outline in obiter dicta that, if the question of revocation is directly on point in the future, then it is a question for the national judicial authority to decide.

Schrems then referred the case to the Irish High Court which decided to request a preliminary ruling on the question of whether national DPAs are absolutely bound by Commission's Decisions.

To the exasperation of the magistrate's seven clerks, Denison routinely cleared his docket in a couple of hours before lunch, ordered the court adjourned, and then, stick in hand and homburg hat on head, strolled off to the handsome dining room of the National Club, at 303 Bay Street.

It is then the task of the national courts to interpret their national laws in accordance with the EU Directives and fundamental rights.

After all, if the Italian decree was precluded by EU law, then, in order to let such a judgment of the ECJ affect the outcome of the national proceedings, the decree had to be considered non-binding by the referring court.

Back in the old days we used to make five photocopies of a bankruptcy petition (one for our files, one for the Trustee, one for the US Trustee, one for the national archives, and one for the court) and then rush to the federal courthouse to file the case before a garnishment or foreclosure took place.

In 1913 the family of a steward on the Titantic sued for compensation in Cheverton v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co (1913) 6 B.W.C.C. 574 which was then cited in 1934 by the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal in Wolfe v. Canadian National Railways, [1934] 3 W.W.R. 497,

During her studies, Valerie summered at a national law firm and then clerked for the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

Yogi Amin, partner and national head of public law at Irwin Mitchell, then spoke about recent developments in health and social care law, including the Care Act, deprivation of liberty cases in the Court of Protection and end of life cases.

Linda Rothstein, Richard Stephenson, Andrew Lewis and Jean - Claude Killey fought for Labatt in the beer wars against the National Hockey League and Molson over the NHL's sponsorship rights, before the Superior Court of Justice (Labatt Brewing Co. Ltd. v. NHL Enterprises Canada L.P., 2011 ONSC 3219), the Court of Appeal (Labatt Brewing Company Limited v. NHL Enterprises Canada, L.P., 2011 ONCA 511), and then back in the Superior Court of Justice (Labatt Brewing Company Limited v. NHL Enterprises Canada, L.P., 2011 ONSC 5652).

[27] It is rare for a state supreme court to adopt a regulatory measure that was not proposed to it, if not directly by the national organization of the ABA, then indirectly through a state or local bar association, acting at the state level on the behest of the ABA.

While the ideology of the district judge may matter only modestly when viewed from a national perspective, if a Court of Appeals is «politically» homogeneous, then one can expect large differences in how district judges sentence in the circuit where the members of the court of appeals are simpatico as compared with how district judges sentence in a circuit where the members of the court of appeals lacks political homogenCourt of Appeals is «politically» homogeneous, then one can expect large differences in how district judges sentence in the circuit where the members of the court of appeals are simpatico as compared with how district judges sentence in a circuit where the members of the court of appeals lacks political homogencourt of appeals are simpatico as compared with how district judges sentence in a circuit where the members of the court of appeals lacks political homogencourt of appeals lacks political homogeneity.

Born 1952; graduated in law from St Kliment Ohridski University, Sofia (1975); Doctor of Laws (1979); Lecturer (1977 - 84), Senior Lecturer (1984 - 90) and then Professor at St Kliment Ohridski University, Sofia (1990 - 2013); Dean of the Faculty of Law of St Kliment Ohridski University, Sofia (1988 - 91); member of the Council on Legislation at the Bulgarian National Assembly (1995 - 97); Jean Monnet Professor at the New Bulgarian University (2002 - 05); Chairman of the Council of Legal Advisers to the President of Bulgaria (2002 - 03); Judge (2003 - 09), then President (2009 - 12), of the Bulgarian Constitutional Court; Head of the Constitutional Law Department at the Faculty of Law of St Kliment Ohridski University, Sofia (2013 - 16); member (2006 - 16) and Vice-President of the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe (2013 - 15); member of the Constitutional Council at the Bulgarian Ombudsman (2015 ‑ 16); editor of a number of legal journals; author of numerous legal publications; Advocate General at the Court of Justice since 19 September 2016.

Born 1950; lawyer (1974 - 80); law degree from the University of Athens (1973); diploma of advanced studies (DEA) in labour law from the University of Paris II, Panthéon - Sorbonne (1977); national expert with the Legal Service of the Commission of the European Communities (1988 - 1990), then Principal Administrator in Directorate General V (Employment, Industrial Relations, Social Affairs)(1990 - 1994); Junior Officer, Junior Member and, since 1999, Member of the Greek Council of State; Associate Member of the Superior Special Court of Greece; Member of the Central Legislative Drafting Committee of Greece (1996 - 98); Director of the Legal Service in the General Secretariat of the Greek Government (1996 - 1998); Judge at the General Court of the European Union (1998 to 2010, President of Chamber from 2004 to 2010); Member of the Supreme Council for Administrative Justice (2011 - 2012); Member of the Special Court for Disputes relating to the Remuneration of Judges and of the Special Court for Actions against Judges (2013 - 2014); Member of the Advisory Panel of Experts on Candidates for Election as Judge to the European Court of Human Rights (2014 - 2015); Member of the Committee responsible for giving an Opinion on Candidates» Suitability to perform the Duties of Judge at the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (2012 - 2015); Lecturer in European Law at the National School for the Judiciary (1995 - 1996 and 2012 - 2015); Judge at the Court of Justice since 7 Octobnational expert with the Legal Service of the Commission of the European Communities (1988 - 1990), then Principal Administrator in Directorate General V (Employment, Industrial Relations, Social Affairs)(1990 - 1994); Junior Officer, Junior Member and, since 1999, Member of the Greek Council of State; Associate Member of the Superior Special Court of Greece; Member of the Central Legislative Drafting Committee of Greece (1996 - 98); Director of the Legal Service in the General Secretariat of the Greek Government (1996 - 1998); Judge at the General Court of the European Union (1998 to 2010, President of Chamber from 2004 to 2010); Member of the Supreme Council for Administrative Justice (2011 - 2012); Member of the Special Court for Disputes relating to the Remuneration of Judges and of the Special Court for Actions against Judges (2013 - 2014); Member of the Advisory Panel of Experts on Candidates for Election as Judge to the European Court of Human Rights (2014 - 2015); Member of the Committee responsible for giving an Opinion on Candidates» Suitability to perform the Duties of Judge at the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (2012 - 2015); Lecturer in European Law at the National School for the Judiciary (1995 - 1996 and 2012 - 2015); Judge at the Court of Justice since 7 OctobNational School for the Judiciary (1995 - 1996 and 2012 - 2015); Judge at the Court of Justice since 7 October 2015.

It is not surprising then that in his speech, Koen Lenaerts strongly endorsed the use of the preliminary procedure by national constitutional courts.

The Court of Justice has consistently resisted answering hypothetical questions and if the original complaint by JS is withdrawn at the national court, then the questions submitted by Supreme Administrative Court are going to be droCourt of Justice has consistently resisted answering hypothetical questions and if the original complaint by JS is withdrawn at the national court, then the questions submitted by Supreme Administrative Court are going to be drocourt, then the questions submitted by Supreme Administrative Court are going to be droCourt are going to be dropped.

If you have gotten a traffic ticket in Yellowstone National Park Wyoming and the Yellowstone National Park Wyoming court is allowing you to go through driving school to dismiss it, or reduce fines, then sign up today for the Driving University Wyoming online driving school and be on your way.

If an National City Michigan court or your insurance provider gives credit for completing defensive driving, then register today for Driving University and enjoy the simplicity and convenience like so many other Michigan drivers have done already.

If an Hawaii National Park Hawaii court or your insurance provider gives credit for completing defensive driving, then register today for Driving University and enjoy the simplicity and convenience like so many other Hawaii drivers have done already.