In the late 1980s, state governors promoted national education goals and
then national education standards and tests because they believed they needed national action after they had done what they could at the state level.
Not exact matches
In a system where the responsibility is on individual schools or groups of schools to deliver high
standards of
education, without local or
national government interference,
then the leadership of those schools becomes central.
If, on the other hand,
national standards attempt to impose their particular vision of a proper
education on those with differing visions,
then national standards are oppressive and likely to face high levels of resistance and non-compliance.
The Finnish
National Board of
Education defines the courses and
standards, municipalities
then write an aligned curriculum, and teachers write the lessons and assessments.
«If you draw the conclusion that all the children in your state are the responsibility of the state's
education system irrespective of the geographic accident of birth...
then you don't want there to be widely variable
standards» on a
national level, he says.
Then came the 1980s, with a stern warning in 1983 from the
National Commission on Excellence in
Education that we were «a nation at risk» because of the low
standards and low expectations in our schools.
National standards won't magically boost learning in the U.S., and if this debate distracts attention from more effective reforms,
then public
education will be worse off.
Under Phillips and deputy
education director, Harvard professor Tom Kane, the Gates Foundation has pursued a very different strategy: attempting to identify the best
standards, curriculum, and pedagogy and
then imposing those best practices through a
national system of
standards and testing.
Smith convinced Basam Shakashiri,
then director of the
Education and Human Resources Directorate at the
National Science Foundation (NSF) to use the concept of systemic reform for a grants competition for states to take on building
standards - based reform in K - 12 science.
When the Obama administration pushed states to adopt the Common Core
national education standards, states
then adopted curricula aligned to those
standards.
Under Bush, David Kearns, the former chair of the Xerox Corporation, was hired by
then Secretary of
Education Lamar Alexander to develop
national academic standards, and during the Clinton administration, corporate executives endorsed the creation of a National Skills Standards Board as part of the Goals 2000 legislation, and similarly supported the School - to - Work Opportuniti
national academic
standards, and during the Clinton administration, corporate executives endorsed the creation of a
National Skills Standards Board as part of the Goals 2000 legislation, and similarly supported the School - to - Work Opportuniti
National Skills
Standards Board as part of the Goals 2000 legislation, and similarly supported the School - to - Work Opportunities Act.8