If Brown can not be justified on originalist grounds, some scholars contend,
then originalism should be rejected, because Brown is a seminal case whose outcome has overwhelming support in our society — both legally and morally.
Not exact matches
In Grutter
then, Scalia appears to have abandoned both
originalism and precedent to arrive at his position.
No matter how you approach it,
then, when it came to voluntary integration, Scalia abandoned what a commitment to
originalism would appear to require.
Following from this erroneous premise, the Court declared open season on
originalism: «[i] f the Canadian Constitution is to be regarded as a «living tree»...
then the determination of categories existing in 1867 becomes of little, other than historic, concern.»