Sentences with phrase «then others chances»

Not exact matches

On the other hand, if a head - and - shoulders pattern signals trouble ahead, then the inverse head - and - shoulders formation signals the opposite — a chance for glory.

If you're a developer and you're able to establish that the contract was presented to the person and he had a reasonable chance of going through it and agreeing to the terms, then technically if all other provisions are valid in the contract, it should remain enforceable.

On the other hand, if the Fed decides to delay raising rates, as the stock market is clearly hoping for, then it will give U.S. investors a chance to assess China's moves to solve its economic problems over the next few months, and respond accordingly later on.

If you continue to put one foot in front of the other, eventually you'll make it to the top of the mountain — and then you'll have the chance to enjoy the view.

Unfortunately, by then, most budget decisions had already been made and the chances that the Committee's recommendations (other than Liberal election promises) would have any impact on the Budget were virtually non-existent.

«If we really can master driving in Pittsburgh, then we feel strongly that we have a good chance of mastering it in most other cities around the world.»

Let us understand what our own selfish genes are up to, because we may then at least have the chance to upset their designs, something that no other species has ever aspired to.»

And then we have to explain how it could be fair for some to have a chance at earning these rewards while others do not.

Even if those checks and balances seem to go against your beliefs, if you still respect the system itself along with the other groups there is still a better chance to live in relative peace then just pushing some sort of movement to eradicate religion altogether.

Have this said by a charismatic leader, then take the opportunity to insolate your country, burn some books so no one has a chance to hear anything other than your dogma, and wham.

Being «safe rather than sorry» is a completely selfish motivation then, and I'd rather live my life unselfishly and risk the remote chance of hell than choose to accept beliefs that I can't justify in our modern society, some of which actually hurt others, just to save my butt.

If you don't live in DC, however, and you live in some benighted cultural desert (like New York City) then nobody is putting on an opera, but you did have the chance to see something else: an oratorio called Moby Dick: Death and Other Curiosities.

So this actually proves what Quran gives the message to the mankind that God Almighty is so mercyful that we can think of... if you know that either one of correct, so the other should be rejected / punished and it is not happening, meaning everyone is being given chances to correct oneself as long as life time is there... and on that day all will be asked for the actions and then will be only two paths... one to good one and the other to somewhere no one would be willing to...

But if, on the other hand, we refuse to regard human socialization as anything more than a chance arrangement, a modus vivendi lacking all power of internal growth, then (excepting, at the most, a few elementary rules safeguarding the living - space of the individual) we find the whole structure of politico - economico - social relations reduced to an arbitrary system of conventional and temporary expedients.

If all is to be conceived by analogy with our human nature, then either Spinoza is right and the eternal, immutable essence of the cosmic soul necessitates everything in the cosmic body, and there is no chance, randomness, or genuinely open alternatives either within the world or as between this and other possible worlds; or there is freedom both in our decisions and in God's.

Consider this... a person goes to college, gets a four year degree in archaeology (or some antiquities preservation analog); spends summers sifting through sand and rock and gravel, all the while taking graduate level classes... person eventually obtains the vaunted PhD in archaeology... then works his / her tail off seeking funding for an archeological excavation, with the payoff being more funding, and more opportunities to dig in the dirt... do you think professional archaeologists are looking hard for evidence of the Exodus on a speculative basis... not a chance... they know their PhD buys them nothing more than a job at Tel Aviv Walmart if they don't discover and publish... so they write grants for digs near established sites / communities, and stay employed sifting rock in culturally safe areas... not unless some shepard stumbles upon a rare find in an unexpected place do you get archeological interest and action in remote places... not at all surprising that the pottery and other evidence of the Exodus and other biblical events lie waiting to be discovered... doesn't mean not there... just not found yet...

is a mere logicker, fastening on a word as the sole expression and exact equivalent of truth, to go on spinning deductions out of the form of the word (which yet having nothing to do with the idea), then he becomes a one - word professor, quarreling, as for truth itself, with all who chance to go out of his word; and, since words are given not to imprison souls but to express them, the variations continually indulged in by others are sure to render him as miserable in his anxieties, as he is meager in his contents, and busy in his quarrels.

They get some education about prenatal or postnatal care, depending where they are in their pregnancy, and then they just have a chance to talk with each other.

The other day I witnessed to a guy at my job (he is homosexual and really hasn't been presented with the gospel) I stated the freeness of it and he said «Well then I guess I could just go and sin as much as I want and at the end believe» - I said «Well, you could, but you may not get the chance because your death may not be as slow or as predictable as you assume».

I don't believe that any religion destroys sex within marriage, rather the stupid family members who push women and men to marry whether or not they are in love, then push them to procreate before they have a chance to know each other, are to blame.

At first I was super hesitant to share this recipe because renditions of this live on so many other Paleo blogs on the internets, but then I figured that since you visit this here site, with all its biscuits and butter and pancakes, that you probably don't visit very many Paleo blogs, so there's a good chance that this might be new - ish to you.

But then the other morning I had possibly the most incredible breakfast ever with them in this gorgeous coconut yoghurt and fresh fruits, and I figured it was about time to give them a second chance.

I really don't want to turn my comment into a negative about wenger, I'm as tired of it as much as everyone else is but the sooner ozil is given the chance in the middle the better, if there are other players who in wengers view are better in that position then wenger will have to sell him with a massive loss.

But in order to set a new Premier League record of 21 in one season, the attacking midfielder needs another four and if our strikers and other outfield players continue to spurn chances the way we have been seeing then he might just fall short.

This media hype of Arsenal winning the league is so delusional.Arsenal stands the same chances as all the other big teams including Liverpool.Wait for a lost match and and a draw then u will see how this same team will be bashed by the same pundits.If u want avoid disappointment, don't raise your expectations to high especially looking at a team that has only made one signing!

If one of wingbacks is Sanchez and the other Walcott or OX then the transition from defense to attack will be super lightening and more chances to get goals.

Higuain is a big NO, he's a bottler of note on the biggest stages, there's a reason Real Madrid got rid of him and he only wound up at Napoli instead of other big champions league clubs, he doesn't have the winning mentality needed to take us forward he missed the best chance in the world cup final then does the same in the copa america final

If that materialises, then it would potentially have a negative impact on his playing time at Barca, albeit he's versatile enough to fill other roles too, but perhaps he'll have a better chance at landing a more prominent role for Madrid in that case.

Reading the thread on this article and I noticed a lot of people naming strikers we could have gotten in past transfer windows that have gone to other club and failed, Balotelli, Falcao, Martinez, Boney etc are recurring names in all the comments, and am sat here thinking because they failed in thee clubs does not necessarily mean they would have failed if we had pulled out our fingers and hot them back then, Balotelli aside I strongly believe all of these players could have made a difference playing infront of our midfield and given the kind of attention and care Wenger gives Giroud and Walcott, adapting our play to suit them and giving them chances after chances even when its blatantly obvious they are average players so please lets not keep using that as an excuse for Wenger's ultra careful attitude in the transfer market, they could have failed with us, or they could have been massive for us, all speculations.

If Ozil stays to feed the new attack, and ManU and United hold each other to draws, then there is a chance to be competitive in the EPL at the very top as both Chelsea and Liverpool are flawed, while the Spurs are in trouble with their stars likely to be poached.

Other then that he must be losing his mind if he thinks this team has any chance of winning the EPL.

I am not sure what contracts other teams want to dump, but if that market is also low then this deal has even more chance of working.

I then look at the stats and find that these other strikers also miss a lot of chances.

Then we straight down the other end and Iwobi gets our best chance of the game but Fabianski denied him at the post.

If our other forward players had performed in the second half of the season and actually put the ball in the net, then his record of chances created would have translated in to record number of assists and the PL title for us.

Realistically then, the only real ones to avoid are Barcelona and Bayern and with any other draw you would think that we have a good chance of finally finishing on top of our group.

Like it happened to other youth stars like Jeff Adelaide, Jon Toral, Jerkinson, Bilik... Wenger has not finished giving Giroud chance to play... then Eddie?

Alexis gets chance to play as a CF for periods as Theo can drop out wide easier than Giroud, if Welbz is playing on the right then all 3 of our players could play wide and CF.. The hold up play Giroud is great at won't be needed so much as Ozil and Alexis can do hold onto the ball and then bring others into play.

unless other clubs stay stagnant then we stand a chance at the title......

If you asked me, if Wenger wants him to get a run of games then he should be loaned out to some team in the EPL for a season and not used to cloud our performances just because he should be given chances when other players suffer and our game suffers.

And if you are slamming SKJ as disloyal because he thinks he will have a better chance of reaching his goals elsewhere, then allow me (and others, I'm sure) to exercise my free speech to say that the thing that you said sucks.

We can use one of the other 4 to establish ourselves as competitive, build the team around them, and then take a chance on potential later in a few years like the Chiefs did with Mahomes.

you said the same thing after this event in 2014... and again in 2015... then last year we did nt actually win anything but we added xhaka so lets get behind the team like wat a «true» fan does... unlike others on this site who do nt really know anything about footie like me even though ive been wrong about our chances for the last 10 seasons it do nt matter coz i'm a real fan and wenger is a great bloke who knows about footie whereas all these negative fans do nt know nuffin... its like listening to some demented uncle every xmas droning on about how things were better in the old days when everyone knew their place....

Lolz at Giroud completely messing that up on first chance and then because of the skill of others around him he actually gets a goal.

If the reports are true about Alexis Sanchez and his attitude being the reason that he was left on the bench when Arsenal faced Liverpool away on Saturday then I think we have to have some sympathy with the manager, even though at the time it seemed to be a crazy move and it certainly did not help our chances of coming away from Anfield with anything other than a defeat.

If we consider that Benteke is as prolific as Giroud does, then I doubt about Benteke's link up ability to open and create chances to other Arsenal players.

If they don't want to discuss other matters then simply ignore the article and let readers who WANT to discuss it get a chance of a voice.

not sure, but if you that's true then it's because we have no other striker than him... soft touches, double passes, hold up play are not great at all for striker... scoring goals from half chances, passing defenders, put fears into them, these are great not yours...

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

this window has just finished i am already thinking about who we will get for the january window we might try for khedira on a really low offer as he is free agent almost would help boost numbers in midfield in the new year as we will no doubt need to filling the numbers about then also i will hold my hands up and say i was wrong this morning for giving wenger stick and saying welbeck is rubbish i have been out in the cold light of day and had a chance to reevaluate the situation and realized that this could be a canny shrew transfer on wenger behalf actually if wenger can turn the clock back and work his magic on welbeck and get him scoring goals and improve his game then we could have a great underrated signing on our hands its wengers absolute trust in him that might be what makes him a great player as this is something that he never had at old mordor if anybody can make him a world beater wenger can he loves this little pet projects improving players against the odds welbeck has the skillset to be high class player upfornt he just needs to work very hard on his finishing i think once he gets a few goals under his belt he will settle in fine and he is a team player you could put him on the left against man city to shore up that side and he will put in a great shift without a complaint that could be his biggest asset to us or on the right whenever we need him there ithinkwenger might start himon the left against city to protect the left back against navas and i bet you if he does a great job we will take a shine to him quickly i am hopeing he will be one of those wenger gems that he finds and polishes up to a high finish i must admit i was annoyed as some other gunners were at not signing d / m and c / h but if wenger does win the league with this lot it will be his greatest win yet and what might play in to our hands is the unpredictable nature of the league in the last few seasons if we get on a good run at the right time we might be hard to stop look at city they should have never lost to stoke but the result is there in black and white for all to see and i think chelsea will hit the skids after a while to just because cesc and costa are doing well now thats there main threat but teams will work out how to stop them as the season goes on and chelsea will become predictable i think we might just do well this season after all