Sentences with phrase «then present time»

I also liked that the author went back and forth to the past and then present time.

Not exact matches

When you go into the bank, you have to have to be able to present how every penny of the loan will be spent, and even then sometimes a first - time business owner seems too risky to the bank and you won't get the loan.

Microsoft's overarching goal is to «democratize A.I.,» which Nadella explained has something to do with analyzing the mountains of data produced by consumers and businesses and then presenting the findings to people who have far less free time than they used to have.

Then, in this technical trading commentary published one day later, we stressed why the most profitable swing traders are those who learn to merely react to the market's price action that is presented to them at any give time, rather than those who attempt to predict the direction of the next move.

It then discounts those future dividends back to the present day, to account for the time value of money since a dollar tomorrow is not worth the same amount as a dollar today.

If you can cut free of impressions that cling to the mind, free of the future and the past — can make yourself, as Empedocles says, «a sphere rejoicing in its perfect stillness,» and concentrate on living what can be lived (which means the present)... then you can spend the time you have left in tranquillity.

If sales management and senior executives are suspicious about social media — if they only see risk, their people wasting time clicking «Like» buttons and employees posting funny pictures, then they would be right to draw down the shutters and, in the process, cut off the opportunity social media presents.

When someone is dying of Natural death has enough time to think about on unfulfilled dreams or desires and reviewing what he / she has done with their lives then anguish or pleasure of fulfillment will be present in every second of the rest of their lives.

Nevertheless, I believe that, from the time of the Enlightenment to the present, one can read the history of the study of divinity as one in which the second commandment, which is like the first but not the first, has increasingly been made into the first and then the only commandment.

Carthage had to feed not only itself and the neighboring villages — whose populations are calculated to have been about three times the present population — but the Roman population as well, including a very large migration of people who were then looking for new opportunities in Rome.

Common sense thinks that «there is» first time, «then» location in time, and only then a looking - forward and backward (and «at» the location itself) from which future, past, and present arise.

satans aim was to stop the fulfillment of the seed that would crush satan underfoot.This hybrid between the angels and man created giants abominations in Gods eyes.They also were a threat to Gods people as can be seen by the giants in the land of caanan after the flood.If we agree on that then there is no way that Eve would have had intercourse with satan [false doctrine of the seed of satan -RCB- because the blood lines were still untainted by angelic beings or satan at the time of Noah maybe that is also why the genealogy of Christ is well presented with no surprises apart from Hagar and Ruth these two were gentiles that shows Gods mercy grace was always there to all nations he accepts people by faith not by race.Prior to the flood the mixing of the angels and man must have been widespread after the flood these beings were present but in limited numbers and God told his people to destroy them as they were abominations but they were a threat to Gods people.It would be interesting to hear what the rabbis had to say on this matter as i would think the stories would have been past down from generation to the next.Especially regarding the flood.God promised he would never flood the earth again but a time is coming when the earth will be judged not by flood but by fire Jesus is our ark and we are safe in him.brentnz

The following is the answer that + Vincent gave at a press conference, to a question about the provision of an Ordinariate «cathedral»: «I think that is something probably beyond their resources at the present time, and I don't think the Ordinariate would thank us, actually, to simply give it responsibility for a church that it would have to then maintain and upkeep.»

If the characteristic mark of hermeneutical theology is its interpretive stance, especially in regard to texts — both the classic text of the Judeo - Christian tradition (the Hebrew Scriptures and the New Testament) and the exemplary theologies that build on the classic text — then heuristic theology is also interpretive, for it claims that its successful unconventional metaphors are not only in continuity with the paradigmatic events and their significance expressed in this classic text but are also appropriate expressions of these matters for the present time.

The history of our salvation is marked by a feminine presence that responds actively and fruitfully to God's initiatives: first Israel, which is presented throughout the Scriptures in feminine terms (as the daughter of Sion or, in those times when the prophets urge her to repentance, as a faithless wife); then Mary; and now the Church (the bride of Christ).

The group then divides into two subgroups, led by the minister and her co-facilitator, for experiential and feeling - level sharing, including debriefing on such between - session assignments as: «Talk to three people about death, being aware of how they respond» or «Imagine that you have only a limited time to live and try to say how this awareness influences your feelings about your lifestyle and present relationship.»

The fundamental question at stake, then, could not have been the scientific question of how things achieved their present form and by what processes, nor even the historical question about time periods and chronological order.

At the present time, then, the task is to broaden the scope and meaning of linguistic analysis so that it can be of service to religious language and, in our particular case, to God - language.

If God is the Fullness of Time, then we have to accustom ourselves to seeing that our present time is not already time; rather, it is lack of tTime, then we have to accustom ourselves to seeing that our present time is not already time; rather, it is lack of ttime is not already time; rather, it is lack of ttime; rather, it is lack of timetime.

The alternative method, often used by scholars, considers one epoch of Biblical religion at a time, presenting the entire complex of ideas which characterized that era, and then moves on to study the next succeeding epoch as a whole.

If time is isomorphic with the real number series of the mathematical continuum, then there is no next instant after the present instant.

The psychic present is, then, durational — it is not an instant of time in the Newtonian sense discussed above.

It would seem that if there is a sensori - motor present then if memory ceased we would be left in Russell's «solipsism - of - the - moment», but not in instantaneity.4 But a graver difficulty arises with this passage, for it seems that we have here a surreptitious renewal of the mathematical notion of time.

Gravity from space (Einstein's relativity) operates on mass through space and matter interaction is a natural process like centrifugal force which made its appearance when a body is morning in circle Jean mass is the amount of matter that must be present before gravity becomes effective or felt, once this minimum amount of matter is reached or exceeded, gravity with mass interact with space - time to bring geodesics and gravity begin to control other bodies and then orbit around each other, another aspect of the twin effect of gravity and mass is the necessity to account for energy required to sustain gravitating mass and where does this energy originating from Einstein's field equation says from space but never refer to the origin of gravitation.

Jeremy, as I often do when I read your thoughts I'm again finding myself a going pretty meta; I spend time thinking about the ideas you present as I read them, but then I spend even more time wondering about how you think through issues and the mental framework you use to approach the issues you discuss on this blog.

If one were the type to be depressed at the thought that the sun will run out of energy some day and our planet become an empty chunk of rock, then I should think one would derive cold comfort in the thought that even at that time God will prehend the present as objectified in his consequent nature!

If, as we know, it is a central feature of all Christian theological ethics that God's future reaches backwards into the present and determines the shape of our moral lives, then what God restores at the end of days we are called in our time to care for and preserve.

Essentially, what you are saying on # 4 is, if the scientific community can not definitively answer your question, then NO ONE can — then there is NO ANSWER to your question at the present time.

If one accepts Whitehead's definition of time as «the conformation of state to state, the later to the earlier,» and if one assumes that the past really changes, then we would have no conception of time because there would be nothing definite or determinate for the present to conform to.12 The distinction between the past and the future seems to be at least partly defined in terms of determinateness and indeterminateness.

At a future time the present evil will still be an evil (in spite of the fact that it will then be an aspect of some good) precisely because greater possibilities of good could have been realized in the present and would have been realized in the future.

If science and technology are ever to be liberated from tutelage to the dominative powers of history, if the drama is to be «interrupted» redemptively rather than destructively, then Christian theology, which has itself been enticed time and again to legitimate dominative power, can contribute to that future by mediating more dialectically to the present the subversive memories of God's identification with the struggles of victims everywhere in the mystery and message of Christ Jesus.

What is needed at the present time, then, is a theology of sin that builds upon the work of the persons cited here, but that can develop a stronger connection between social structures and individuals, and with the ancient insights concerning original sin.

(Cf. the phenomenon of the «runners» at first connected with the mother plant and then separated from it; the fluid transition between various plants and animals which appear to be one; the germ - cell inside and outside the parent organism, etc.) Living forms which present what are apparently very great differences in space and time can ontologically have the same morphological principle, so that enormous differences of external form can derive from the material substratum and chance patterns of circumstance without change of substantial form (caterpillar - chrysalis butterfly).

Let men be of good heart then, for Christ's religion will show itself, and at this present time, to be no failure, for it has within itself the power to bring up from its vast treasury, new things and old for the light and the comfort of men of good will.

Let it be acknowledged then that Josephus is not a first - class historian; but the failure to recognize the validity of his facts, especially in that part of his work which lay largely within his own experience and recollection, and the truth of his interpretations, as far as they go — he is never exhaustive — is surely responsible for the neglect of his writings by too many interpreters of the New Testament at the present time, and for the rise of theories which leave not only Josephus but likewise the New Testament out of the reckoning.

If these functions are most intimately related with diverse portions of the brain, then it seems necessary to suppose that the dominant occasion is present at the same time at all these diverse places.

Are not the process thinkers, then, well attuned to their times and well poised to define what is good in the present moment of history and to convince the postmodern public of their definition?

Since this is probably not the last installment of «Scandal Time,» it is worth recalling where we have been and then bring it back to the present.

Then it can be recognized that the need and suffering of the world are the sinner's need and suffering, and so do not stand in contradiction to the providence of God, and that the right to affirm the providence of God exists only for him to whom the God of the present is at the same time God of the future.

What we perceive in the presented present, then, are events on the front surface of the time cone of events in the causal past of actual world.

Every manifestation of the Son of Man in time and space is presented to my notitia in such a way that he may nevertheless remain concealed: It is then impossible to make the assent of Thomas: «My Lord and my God» (John 20:29).

I suppose if we could revisit ourselves in a thousand years, look at the historical recordings of ourselves, we will see there are factual basis, but sprinkled with human interpretation of our present time now by those who have appointed themselves as the keepers of what we do, just as the recordings of the Bible were done by those appointees trying to capture there presnt now... yet sprinkled with their best interpretation of what they new then.

Or perhaps he did not do at all what is related, but something altogether different, which is accounted for by the circumstances of his times — then let us forget him, for it is not worth while to remember that past which can not become a present.

If Christ is the «first - born from the dead», then this means that the End - time is already present.

The great Catholic philosopher, by then well into his eighties, subtitled his book An Old Layman Questions Himself about the Present Time.

Then, in the circle of his spotlight, two other figures appeared — Moses the lawgiver and the prophet Elijah — dead heroes of the past alive in the present, as if time were nothing but a veil to be parted and stepped through.

If the statement is about someone else, and especially if I was not even present at the time, then coherence and consistency hold sway in my decision as to whether to believe the statement or not.

As part of the attempt to encourage them to reflect critically, at times I model it for them by presenting my own position, refuting it, then providing counter-arguments to the refutation once they have been appropriately taken into account.

If present, past, and future are simultaneous, then past time is lost and unredeemable.

As we explore these issues our itinerary will be as follows: (1) we shall look first at several ways in which reflection on science has contributed to the feeling of cosmic exile and therefore to our environmental carelessness; (2) then we shall examine how theologies from our own Christian tradition that have hovered closely, even though critically, around modern scientific cosmologies have perpetuated the same feeling of cosmic exile; and (3) finally we shall look briefly at how a cosmological understanding of religion centering on the notion of adventure can both reconcile us to the evolving universe and at the same time allow us to embrace the feeling of religious homelessness present in religious teachings.