Not exact matches
IF the torture law was seen to work, and there was a dramatic decrease in violent crimes because bad people realized that they were okay with a death
sentence, but 25 years of electric niple clamps was more than they were willing to take on,
then the government could make the case that they enacted the will of the people by
reducing crime.
We will continue to ensure that serious and dangerous offenders are managed effectively and their risk is
reduced through appropriate use of prison and
then through the multi-agency public protection arrangements... Any adult who commits a crime using a knife can expect to be sent to prison, and serious offenders can expect a long
sentence.
Note that he used the past in his
sentence «satellite data showed no warming» and
then he goes on «The report showed that selective corrections to the atmospheric data could lead to some warming, thus
reducing the conflict between observations and models descriptions of what greenhouse warming should look like.»
The
sentences should
then be
reduced to a keyword outline.
If the judge does not follow standard
sentencing guidelines for a case,
then an appeal may be able to
reduce your penalties.
His reasoning was that «Imposing separate
sentences seems artificial, although if I were to do so it would
then be appropriate to impose consecutive
sentences and
then potentially
reduce the sum of them appropriately under the totality principle» (at para 97).
Although none of that
sentencing range is a mandatory minimum range, any jury that convicts for such a crime will
then recommend a
sentence, after being told the five to forty year
sentencing range, without ever being told that any of the five years can be
reduced by the
sentencing judge.