Sentences with phrase «then ridicules»

However, his testimony then ridicules three out of the four individuals at the hearing because they «represent that tiny minority that reject this consensus or downplay its significance».
Learn the theory, then ridicule.
Four stages of social change (from Gandhi) First they ignore you (pre 1920) Then they ridicule you (1920 to 1970) Then they fight you (started about 1970) Then you win.
As for Pavarotti But then ridicule is nothing new in Susan Boyle's life.
Problem with some fans is they make up their minds about a player and then ridicule him however he plays.
My reply: #agw @Revkin: Watts is at third of Gandhi's four stages: «First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win»
He ignored the fact the global warming hypothesis was never tested, then ridiculed those who tried to practice the science he once advocated.
Those who dared suggested otherwise were first ignored, then ridiculed, and only much later able to fight for truth and justice.
You ask them to provide evidence for their outrageous claims and they dish up textbook radiative physics as if it proved their case, and then ridicule the public for questioning them.
As Mahatma Gandhi told us, «first they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win.»
Then they ridicule you.

Not exact matches

There is much that could be said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.
Maybe when Christians stop toting themselves as the moral authority on EVERYTHING and keep their noses out of peoples personal lives AND stop trying to keep taxpaying American citizens from having rights (ie gays)... maybe then they will come into less ridicule.
You might be rebuffed or ridiculed, but if you actually want resolution then realize it is on you, first, to be the decent person.
The video then jumps to the footage of decapitated head laying atop man's dead body — which I'm assuming is because cutting through his spine took them forever, so they got rid of that so they're not ridiculed for being complete amateurs.
But look at what she and her supporters had to go through: threats; intimidation; ridicule; loss of friends; debt; years or months of sleeplessness, stress and anxiety; self - doubt; fear; demands for proof of medical records, police reports, emails, and court documents; then finally being believed not because you are a person but only because you produce authoritative authentication.
If so, and they were apart or worked at that place, then I guess they were just as guilty and deserved just as much punishment and ridicule as the person actually committing the offense..
It's ok to ridicule Christians all over the place, then call them not the actual Christians, equate Jesus, Moses, etc. to someone coming out as gay, but those who «traditionally» don't like depictions of their prophet should be «respected».
If you believe in The Bible, as we do, being Christians, then this is true: http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Corinthians+15:28-30&version=NIV or you can read it here also: http://www.lds.org/scriptures/nt/1-cor/15.29?lang=eng#28 So, even though CNN wants to ridicule a Gospel principle, for us, LDS member, we have nothing to hide, it's in the Bible and at the time of Christ that was a practice that was in place as part of the Gospel of Christ.
No zealot changes one to their ideas by ridiculing someone and then shoving their beliefs in others faces.
Any religion that teaches hate of anything but what God hates such as fornication idolotry or murder is not a true Christian there is only one Christian faith that has never been accused of doing nothing but teach people the bible going door to door but this is why people ridicule them for doing what the bible says they do nt charge for their material they do nt have communions they do nt pay their members for 2 years or send them to a college for doing so they do nt pay the speakers like other churches and they do nt hate anyone based on any reason they only give them bible knowledge then once they know the knowledge its their choice what to do with it.
Unless you can give credible evidence for your God (hint: the Bible is not a good example in case you didn't understand what I meant by self / circular reference), then you will continue to be ridiculed for being gullible.
If we can't disagree without ridiculing each other, then we will never go anywhere.
If you publicly proclaim your belief in faeries and insist that others live their lives based on your belief then expect to get ridiculed.
Again, with like sarcasm, he ridicules the entire faith and vogue of idols: one cuts a tree for firewood, using it for heating and for cooking; but still a sizable piece remains, until as an afterthought it is given to a craftsman who, with a deal of labor, shapes it into a pretense of human form — and then men bow down to it and say, «Deliver me, for thou art my god!»
I stand by your decision to illuminate the poisonous secretive cover - up of abuse, then the subsequent ridicule and shaming of women when they blow the whistle on spousal abuse.
its so amazing there people is this world are so caught up in living for themselves, what if the rapture happened while reading my text, what then, will you stil care what clothes you are wearing or what what car you are driving,, while GOD is removed from this earth, and now society will have to make a real decision if they want to contine to live in sin or realize they now understand the truth and the warnings given before, but now bc of the anti christ have to denounce GOD (take the mark of the beast) or be killed, and if you do nt believe in christ now, will you be willing to die for christ then, i would rather be ridiculed by the world for being a true christian then be gay, seperated from GOD, and then cast in the lake of fire for all eternity tormented bc i refused to repent bc i wanted to live for myself, ready the story about the man in hades who to this day, still has not had a drop of water on his tongue to quench is thirst, THE BIBLE WAS WRITEN BC HELL IS REAL AND GOD IS REAL, DO NOT BE DECEIVED, YOU HAVE TO MAKE A CHOICE WHO YOU WILL SERVE, THE NARROW ROAD WHICH LEADS TO LIFE OR THE WIDE, AND IF GOD CALLS YOU AND YOUR STILL ON THE FENCE, IN GODS EYES YOU HAVE ALREADY MADE A CHOICE, THE BIG QUESTION IS: WILL THE LIFE YOUR NOW LIVING BE WORTH SPENDING ETERNITY IN LAKE OF FIRE?
Since we must face each other now and then we do not have the luxury of being smarmy and using ridicule as weapons.
If you did not grow up in the church, then you might have had the experience of feeling judged, ridiculed, shamed, or even hated by certain groups of Christians.
It sometimes seems we Christians know we are doing a poor job with evangelism, so we make sure we do a poor job so that we get ridiculed so that we can then claim «persecution.»
If that appears to you to be unhealthy ridicule and condescension, then I have to say, I think that's been the responsibility for you to take for having formed that perception.
Now that's just * genius * - think up a huge co.ck & bull story and then «prophesy» that folks will ridicule it....
It is when they think their affiliation affords themselves something unique, safe and holy — then they are open to ridicule.
These forms of consciousness will of course be different for every person, based on personal experience... so that is where a personal God comes in... one that fits each person's current level of understanding... a living, hopefully growing perception as knowledge increases, instead of a fixed idol or icon... but if it provides a person a non-harmful useful comfort and positive function, then what genius has the right to deprive them of that, with ridicule that their understanding is different and better, when the person being ridiculed at the time, does not possess the knowledge required to have the same understanding of the person ridiculing.
If Bell's book is not an argument for universalism, and that Bell's rhetorical questions are not meant to ridicule the traditional beliefs of eternal conscious suffering, penal substitutionary atonement, and salvation by faith alone in Christ alone, then the marketing mechanism is a paradigm example of what Harry Frankfurt has defined as «bull ****.»
If people believe that the bible is God's word and they follow it blindly then they are truly idiots however — if people also believe that human consciousness and the creation of the universe is the work of «evolution'then they are equally unintelligent and deserving of ridicule.
Well that brings to mind Bill Ayers who said he will never apologize for blowing up U.S. federal buildings and injuring people (along with HIS wife Bernadette Dohrn) Then, of course, Obama keeps talking about the «Holy Quran» and making ridicule of the Christian Bible..
Then Wenger drops the bombshell.Sit back let them dominate the possession dominate us physically and dominate the tempo of the game.I will then send on Laca to Esther score the winner or equaliser.FFS This man is a joke.On # 9m a year I would gladly live with the ridicule and embarrassment I am many Gooner will face this week.Unfortunately our Board feel it's only right to continually reward failure.If the man had any love for this club he would JUST GOThen Wenger drops the bombshell.Sit back let them dominate the possession dominate us physically and dominate the tempo of the game.I will then send on Laca to Esther score the winner or equaliser.FFS This man is a joke.On # 9m a year I would gladly live with the ridicule and embarrassment I am many Gooner will face this week.Unfortunately our Board feel it's only right to continually reward failure.If the man had any love for this club he would JUST GOthen send on Laca to Esther score the winner or equaliser.FFS This man is a joke.On # 9m a year I would gladly live with the ridicule and embarrassment I am many Gooner will face this week.Unfortunately our Board feel it's only right to continually reward failure.If the man had any love for this club he would JUST GO NOW
If you believe that the likes of Liverpool and Spurs, who have been far far less successful than us over recent years, receive anything like the criticism, ridicule and down right abuse that we do, then I'm afraid I've missed it.
When you think of all the scorn, criticism and ridicule he has endured since then to the present day it should perhaps be remembered that he could have made some very different decisions in 2005 - 07 that would have massively improved his reputation and legacy.
@ Jembot Arsene its deluded fans like you that is killing Arsenal fc, if you can't see how bad Wenger's philosophy has ridiculed this great club then you are of all men most miserable.
Should that be true, then yeah he deserves all the ridicule that is coming his way.
In a first - quarter timeout during a 106 - 97 loss to the Suns, Collins reportedly questioned — Thorpe would say ridiculed — his power forward's defensive commitment in front of the team, then later refused to discuss the incident with him, which only made Thorpe angrier.
It was fitting that he got called out by Joe with video proof right then and there and I hope he gets the ridicule he deserves for trying to get an unwarranted DQ victory or at the very least an unearned rest after getting waxed by 2 knees.
And then destiny smiled at him again after Wojciech Szczesny followed his Southampton horror show with a cigarette and his loud mouth dad ridiculing Arsenal.
Arsenal are ridiculed for the so / called Wenger trophy but when any other club, as Chelsea, Liverpool and Man United have all done recently, drop out of Europe's blue ribbon event then it is a disaster.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
It seems things have gotten a little worse for the Frenchman since then as his choice of attire in training today made him a subject of ridicule with the squad.
It is interesting that the same pundits who ridiculed Wenger (who was the first person to mention this drawback to Tottenham's spending) would then turn around to use the same rationale for Spurs struggles immediately after their defeat at the Emirates and for the rest of the 2013/14 season.
This decision then gets ridiculed because Arsenal have options on the bench in terms of Walcott and Oxlade — Chamberlain who are better suited.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z