Sentences with phrase «then see if its true»

if I win this sure to be Wonderful book, i can then see if its true, that its quite the follow up to the first little gem!!

Not exact matches

On the other hand, If the Government truly wants to ensure an independent rate seeing process, and ensure that EI revenues are solely used for EI program costs, then this would require setting up a true fund outside the control of the government and Consolidated Revenue Fund.

If it's really true that he was unaware of these issues, then Parker might qualify as the most clueless leader of a $ 112 billion corporation the world has ever seen.

True enough, if you see a real trend developing and allocate your investments to take advantage of it, then you probably will earn greater returns than your competition.

you cant put your finger on it, cant smell it, or taste it, but your soul will rejoice, if you have one left... this is your connection to the world, to the universe... nothing else really matters at all... we see all of this creation, and we've got the math and science to figure out a tenth of it, but if we cant realize that it was put here ultimatly out of love, and saved by the love of ONE true God, then we are blind even to that tenth... God is great, and may he bless you athiest, muslim, christian, jew, gay, whatever... God is Love, but rest assure He is also our Judge, the Judge of our hearts, hope you get them right.

I he doubts or questions what the prophet has told him or whatever then he can always pray to see if it is true.

They were upset about land, and by creating this community, it gave them power... I can easily see historically how through the nature of man this religion formed... but, if one holds the Bible to be the account of the one true God and He speciifically states the word is God... and then goes on to say there will be false prophets... there you have it.

If, as some persons maintain, Christianity was a total transformation of the message of Jesus — a doctrine about Jesus rather than Jesus» own teaching — then it is of paramount importance to see how and why this transformation took place, or rather, first of all, whether the theory of transformation is true.

I have seen these beliefs become like «faith beliefs» in that if a person merely says they believe them to be true then they are considered correct.

If what you say is true, then why is it that I see billboards, roadside signs, TV, print and onlineadvertisements EVERY day in which religious groups try to force their particular brand of religion on everyone, yet on the rare occasion that an atheist does the same, it makes national news.

We see the lies and distortion of the Bible here and if there is no respect and want to preserve the true word of God then why would you think that there was hope for honesty on their part in anything.

Not what u see on CNN, not what your mum said nor your pastor or priest said and not what u see some Muslims neighbors of yours do... noooo nay,,, what have u searched your self... i dare u do... find the true, i swear nothing makes any sense as Islam does, those guys know the whole truth... even if it will hurt, just like Santa - clause when u 12 year or the rats that gives money to the de toothing kid in our Ugandan myth, u deserve to know the truth... and if no scientist has come out and disproved the divine origin of this universe logically then there must be a mighty some one behind it and that Creator or whatever it is, HE has a way, a straight path to Him and we are obliged to know it... so my adverse to u is look hard for the true coz it is clear from false, even if u may hate it!!

If you are going to argue that your perspective is more true than ours, then you should really take a look at the foundation for your beliefs and see if you can really put faith in that foundatioIf you are going to argue that your perspective is more true than ours, then you should really take a look at the foundation for your beliefs and see if you can really put faith in that foundatioif you can really put faith in that foundation.

seriously, I want to see that, because if it's true, then I will immediately unsubscribe to his blog and tell everyone I know to also do that, but if not, then you should delete this post, because you are making claims for which you have no proof

If they are truly One, then the total character of God can be seen in Christ, and the incarnation was the revelation of who the One true God really is, thereby shattering all the myths of a God of war that prevailed in the Hebrew tradition.

Then you truly do not understand the true nature of God... He saw that none of us would be good enough to attain heaven (except little children who die at an early age) so He sent the only One who had never sinned, who even though he sweated blood and asked if there was any other way, but ultimately said,» not my will but Yours,» paid our way into Heaven.

«There is no real education without personal responsibility, and there is no responsibility without freedom» If true education is an education in the virtues then we can begin to see a link between the work of the Jubilee Centre and the work of the Benedictus College of the liberal arts, which places itself in a tradition stretching back through Blessed John Henry Newman, St Thomas Aquinas and St Augustine to Aristotle.

@honestanon Just a quick one here but if you do a bit of research you will see many clashes at Gurdwaras around the World and a great number of them are from good, honest hard - working Sikhs who see that a few individuals with an extremist viewpoint try to make their way in to our Gurdwaras, gain trust and then later show their true colors by trying to implement their extremist views.

If It were true that all the evil were on one side, then any appeal to fairness might be seen as making a pact with the devil.

If he thinks the Mormon faith is true Christianity as the Bible teaches then Osteen can not recognize a cult when he sees one.

So, if a group, or a church denies any one of these, by maybe saying that they are the only church going to heaven, or by saying that they hope in good works along with Jesus Christ, or by denying the three members of the Trinity as we saw here, or by denying that there is only one God and Father, then we can safely assume that they are not a true church.

If you know God then you see only the one true God and as you brought to my attention I then view the world through that lens.

if not having god in your life means a meaningless life well again all i see is a less then true love of life and a yearning for death.

You» accepted Christ», and... then... you decided to see if what you believed was true?

We do not deny or circumscribe the Creator, because we hold he has created the self - acting originating human mind, which has almost a creative gift; much less then do we deny or circumscribe His power, if we hold that He gave matter such laws as by their blind instrumentality moulded and constructed through innumerable ages the world as we see it... Mr Darwin's theory need not then be atheistical, be it true or not; it may simply be suggesting a larger idea of Divine Prescience and Skill... At first sight I do not see that «the accidental evolution or organic beings» is inconsistent with divine design - It is accidental to us, not to God.»

if all Christians reflected this then it woudl be easy to see us as the only true and righteosu in the world...

And if theSacrament of Penance is linked in the minds of the People of God to a concerted effort to become saints, then it will be seen as a true life - line and an essential part of the devout life.

Now if these charges are true I can see no possibility of a Catholic death - of - God theology, nor for that matter could I then see the possibility of any form of Christian atheism.

But listen, no matter how good a person may seem on the outside, if they have it in them to always deny that nagging feeling that Christ is true, then there is something different and not - so - good about them that we don't see.

Jeremy I believe you answered the question in another discussion why God seemed evil by punishing other nations i prefer the word you used which is judgement.God weighs up the hearts and then judges fairly thats not evil in fact he weighs up all the factors before he makes his decision and his decisions are perfect and wise.When he commanded Israel to wipe out other nations it was Gods judgement on these nations because of the evil they had committed in alot of ways its exaggerated because they did nt have Christ to shield them like we have if anything it shows how merciful God is towards us today.In those days gods judgement was quick and immediate.What happened to Israel when they broke the laws God gave them they immediately fell into judgement often resulting in many deaths to there own people until the sins of the people were dwelt with.So even for Gods people it was a conditional on there attitude and actions towards God.Again we see God is merciful to these previous nations that were destroyed as Christ after his crucifiction went and preached to them giving them the opportunity to repent so again we see God is still merciful.His word is true The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness.

Whether they mean their apology or not will soon be easy to see: in the future, when another black couple comes and wants to be married, if they marry them, then that's how we'll know there was true repentance.

The shepherd «loves» his sheep, but if the sheep «examine what he says with the scriptures to see if it's true and find it's not true», then they are disloyal and must be yanked and «disciplined» because they are «unruly» 2 Thes.

But if Jesus truly is the exact representation of God (Heb 1:3), and if it is true that if we see Jesus we see the Father (John 15:7 - 9), and since Jesus never behaved violently toward His enemies, but told us to love them and serve them instead, and indeed, rather than killing them, Jesus died for His enemies, then this must be what Good looks like as well!

Philosopher when you theorise that God created sin that path will take you to a place of unbelief and a mistrust in God as it is a place of doubt and unbelief if you see God as evil.That is one path everyone is free to take.The scriptures say that without faith it is impossible to please God.The other path is that we believe that the bible is true that God is holy and righteous and sin does not dwell him.Ultimately if we believe and trust him then we shall be saved.What does your theory offer is there hope or is there eternal life in your belief the answer is no because unless we believe in Jesus we shall not be saved and eternity is a long time if you are wrong.brentnz

Not withstanding that if it were true it would also be true that those left behind would be in for the worst near decade that the world has ever seen and then most likely committed to an eternity of torment.

If Jesus reveals the true nature of God, we don't see him expressing an unquenchable wrath towards those he forgives with a word, it would seem odd then to paint God the father differently.

If they do not have any on at all, then some may see them as not true to their faith.

In fact, without this a priori framework it would be possible to see from the text that for Paul the knowledge of God through creation is a redemptive knowledge, since, if the loss of this knowledge and the failure to accept the law written in the heart result in a loss of grace and condemnation (Rom 1:18; 2:14 - 16), then the converse must be true, namely, that the possession of this knowledge means the possession of grace and therefore salvation.

Here is what I am making this week: 1) Ketchup (see this post): I finally made the ketchup and it turned out great — just waiting for it to ferment and then the true tasters will have to tell me if they approve — I personally don't care for ketchup — making this for my ketchup lovers in the house!

If all the «I want to play in the champs league is true» and «I've made my decision» crap which seems likely given the interviews for all to see, then I'd sell him.

If it's true that they're going for Aguero (not that I see City selling him) then they definitely will be selling Benzema.

It just remains to be seen if we get them andif they are the players that will make a difference, if neither are proven true then aybe tove will be.

If that is true then I see no reason why Arsenal should not have high hopes of beating Mourinho to the punch.

If this is true then it cl; early reflects badly on the play maker and will infuriate Arsenal fans who pay to see him.

So true he chose arsenal over Liverpool so if he feels he wants that much the he should go elsewhere and warm the bench because the same guadiola was using him as a sub at barca and I don't see him unsettling Leroy Sane, Aguero, Jesus and Sterling... Let's see where he goes and what will happen city is not really a power house in england they just over spend then rely on luck over Manchester united on deadline day with an expensive collection of players not really a team later on with a collection of gunmen in form of negredo aguero and dzeko.

luvdaguns the only problem with that is if what some experts say is true and Vardy don't fit in to our team play then we are snookered once again without a top striker, we should of gone for Zlatan with two year contract and see if Dany comes up trump,

I'm so sick of people telling those of us who are disgruntled fans to relax and give this club time to correct itself... for anyone who believes that taking a wait - and - see approach is appropriate at this juncture they should take a good long look at themselves in the mirror because they are a big part of the problem... no other «big» club's fans would stand for this shit for nearly as long as we have... think about it, we've witnessed a changing of the guard at every major club in England, Spain, France and Germany in the last several years because those «big» clubs failed to live up to expectations (Barcelona, Real Madrid, Bayern, PSG, Chelsea, ManU, ManCity etc...)... for some reason, many fans have become as fragile as our current manager, believing that there couldn't possibly be a suitable replacement, even though everyone of these clubs have found multiple replacements and still achieved far more than our club... this mindset has been created by an organization that has been milking it's fans, telling countless lies (no world class players available) and lowering expectations every since they rolled out the biggest lie of all: that we couldn't spend because of the new stadium but once it was paid off we could compete with any team in the world... this organization is rotting from the inside out and if we don't demand that those in charge put soccer first this despicable behaviour won't end with Wenger's ridiculous 2 year contract... I think the real fear isn't that a suitable replacement doesn't exist, but that this organization is so money hungry and poorly mismanaged that we will sink even lower by choosing our next coach the same way they choose our players, on the cheap... even so, we need to see what mustache will do if left to his own devices so he will have to show his true colours... only then can we purge this club and start anew

Very true Ozil and Sanchez are waiting to see what Wenger does in the transfer window, if we are a club of ambition then we'll sign players of world class quality!

Geoff, if all you've said in your article posting are true and nothing but the truth, then the success of Arsene Wenger as manager of Arsenal FC has appeared to be questionable at a stage in his management there and needing a bright light to see the reason behind the veil and unveiled it.

If the club are unable to sell and rebuild, then they may well have to rely on the individuals currently at their disposal, and in a difficult league such as the Championship, it remains to be seen whether or not they are good enough to dismiss the possibility of Merson's fears coming true.