Sentences with phrase «then sell at a higher price»

Another option — one that adds a level of safety — is to make a «10 % Trade» and get paid immediately for simply agreeing to buy shares today and then sell them at a higher price in the future.

For example, a trader might buy some bitcoin at a low price, and then sell it at a high price for Tether, and so on.

Arbitrage is the practice of buying something at a lower price in one market and then selling it at a higher price in another.

Not exact matches

Vallée's advice: sell the Canadian dollar now while it's hot, and then buy it back at a cheaper price before it goes even higher.

In Panther's case, the CFTC said, the company and Coscia would place a relatively small order to sell futures they wanted to execute, then quickly followed with several large buy orders at successively higher prices that they intended to cancel.

That means traders who bought the options per Quigg's recommendation were already set to make a profit: If they exercise their option to sell the shares at the higher strike price and then buy at a lower price, they profit with the difference.

The company (and its bankers) would then move down from the top bid until it reached the highest price at which it could sell all the shares it wanted to offer.

That is, if the market price of the stock is higher than the strike price, then the ETF will be obliged to sell the stock for the agreed strike price and then buy it back at the higher market price.

LONG — When we go long it means we are buying the market and so we want the market to rise so that we can then sell back our position at a higher price than we bought for.

Coscia's sell order was then terminated and the process reversed, with the newly purchased lots offered for sale at a slightly higher price, intending to trick the front - running algorithms into buying them.

Find a house that has potential to sell for a higher dollar amount if cosmetic changes are made, and then compare the cost of the home and the repairs to the price at which you could sell it in the end.

Then if you think you're unlucky because the market sells off just after you bought, think again and reconsider whether or not you were unlucky or whether you just got your wish and are now able to scale in at lower rather than higher prices as you build your positions before the Gold Rocket Ship blasts - off.

The products of such research are then patented and sold back to the developing countries at excessively high prices.

According to Spanish publication Marca, Real will exercise that clause at the end of the season, but possibly only to then sell Morata on to a Premier League suitor at a higher price of $ 50m (# 38.5 m).

1) Ten years without a significant trophy yet the Manager is never questioned 2) Selling off key «World beater» Players season after season and replacing them with mediocre at best replacements 3) Keeping a 33 % shareholder who is one of the world's richest men AND a true football fan as far away from the board as possible 4) Charging possibly the highest prices in Europe but NOT reinvesting within the team in any really significant way 5) Classing 4th place in the EPL as a trophy 6) Boasting of a # 100 million war chest for transfers then quibbling over a few hundred thousand on deals.

Bayern then would consider selling at high price.

Sustaining innovations improve existing products and services, which can then be sold at higher prices to better customers.

Even if the manufacturer had included all the above features and launched the City at a higher price, then they would have surely killed the product since it competes with the Hyundai Verna which sells because of its value for money quotient.

However, if you want to make the most money (especially on Amazon, which only allows authors to receive 70 percent in royalties if the book is priced at $ 2.99 or higher — $ 1.99 and $ 0.99 books only allow authors a 35 percent royalty rate), then $ 4.99 appears to be the best price point for selling a good amount of books (though far less than with a lower price point) while making the most in profit.

At a price point on the high end of the spectrum for tablets, the Eee Pad 121 sold better then the executives were expecting.

You're right in that they are used to the «old system,» which is to sell high at the beginning, then dynamically adjust the price as demand rises or falls.

Mark went on to mention «If an author can earn the same or greater income selling lower cost books, yet reach significantly more readers, then, drum roll please, it means the authors who are selling higher priced books through traditional publishers are at an extreme disadvantage to indie authors in terms of long term platform building.

I would bet that if you priced one book at 99 cents, and then had a lead in from that book to the second book (with a sales page), you could sell the second book at a higher price — possibly even higher than $ 4.99.

The cost per book for PoD is also going down, a few years ago, the PoD printing cost was higher than the retail cost of an offset print book, then it dropped so it was lower than the retail cost of a similar sized book, but without sufficient margin to allow you to sell to bookstores at 50 % list price (let alone deal with the returns).

It normally sells for $ 150 and even then it's one of the least expensive 10 - inch tablets on the market with a high - resolution 1080p screen (I use the Fire HD 10 every day and think it's a great buy at that price).

If this is the case, then the financial advantages of Select will be quickly erased, especially for established authors or those selling at a higher price.)

If Amazon is going to spec it with leading technology components, but charge for less money than competitors (which are using similar parts and selling for higher prices at weak margins), then it follows that they're planning on losing money on the tablet and making the money instead on the products and services the owner will subsequently buy from Amazon.

The method is genius: Thoughtfully plot and craft a long - form tale that embraces waves of conflict and cliffhangers, separate it into à la carte episodes at low price points (reducing perceived risk and barrier of entry for consumers), then package them into omnibuses (sold at higher price points that deliver much higher per - sale royalties than the à la carte approach).

Sadly, like many other commodities, I think we may end up with a tiered market, where the higher end businesses sell better product at higher prices, but fewer products, and then we'll have the dollar store version of books, where you get what you pay for, which for the most part is junk, but you know, people buy it anyway.

What galls me is when the author sell their ebooks at such high prices that results in less than impressive sales the whole thing is deemed a failure and then they pull them.

If an author can earn the same or greater income selling lower cost books, yet reach significantly more readers, then, drum roll please, it means the authors who are selling higher priced books through traditional publishers are at an extreme disadvantage to indie authors in terms of long term platform building.

The value of XYZ rises exponentially high, and you have to buy 100 shares at this price and then sell them at the strike price.

You could decide to place a limit order in your MetaTrader platform at the resistance you want to sell at, assuming price is below that level currently, then when (if) price does rotate higher into the level, your limit sell order would get filled for a short.

But often a timing system can tell you to sell a fund at a certain price and then buy it back at a higher price.

Then they try to sell the payment stream to an investor at a higher price, thus eliminating their risks on the annuitant prematurely dying.

So, just to confirm, if you don't re-invest your dividends, are you losing out on this potential to minimize your capital gains because the dividends are paid out in cash and then you just get taxed on it at the end of the tax year and when you sell your investment, you potentially will have a larger difference between the sale price and book value (assuming your security increased in value), and thus pay a higher capital gains tax.

«'' One variation I heard is that Paulson's buddies will form new companies and have G - Sax leverage loans and convert debt into equity that way as a way to keep up shareholder equity — then they will sell at the artificially high price back to others like them in a mini — bubble.

If you have to sell portions of your portfolio and thus rely on finding someone else to sell at higher prices than you bought, then you increase the risk of outliving your money.

Criminals are gravitating to those distressed housing markets to employ foreclosure rescue schemes and other fraudulent plots such as «flopping» or selling homes at deflated short sale values then quickly selling it for a higher price, according to Interthinx,... View Article

The logic is that if the shares started trading at $ 30 with 6 months before the transaction closes (example, and assuming that $ 30 is the deal price), then you could sell and put the money in a high interest savings account (or T - bills) and collect risk - free interest until then, thereby coming out ahead.

However, as papy02 says above (and I think I said elsewhere), the prospect of the board selling shares @ 32p & then buying them back (possibly, shortly thereafter) at far higher prices seems a mite embarrassing... It certainly seems to suggest at least one of those decisions might be less than smart — and I certainly don't think it would be the decision to buy back shares at an attractive discount..!

Flipping Flipping is when you make an offer on a property and then either look to secure a new buyer at a higher price before you close on the deal, or wait for it to rise in value, then sell on.

After the property has been renovated, the investor can then turn around and sell the property at a much higher price, and thus a profit is made.

The goal is to sell the securities at a higher price, and then buy them back at a lower price.

When rising demand for the shares causes them to trade at a higher price (i.e., at a premium), the Authorized Participant (AP) may find it profitable to create shares by buying the underlying securities, exchanging them for ETF shares, and then selling those shares into the market.

The call buyer can then sell it at the higher market price and make a profit.

Does the superficial loss work (almost in reverse) if one shorts a stock, then buys it later at a higher price to bring one's position to zero, and THEN buys it long, sells it at a profit all within 30 days but without realising an overall prothen buys it later at a higher price to bring one's position to zero, and THEN buys it long, sells it at a profit all within 30 days but without realising an overall proTHEN buys it long, sells it at a profit all within 30 days but without realising an overall profit?

If this does not happen then the trader could purchase at a lower price, sell in the futures market at a higher price and make a handsome profit.

If this happens and you later have to «cover» your short by purchasing the stock at a higher price than you sold it for earlier, then you've lost money.

These false signals often resulted in the trader selling and then buying back at a higher price.