Sentences with phrase «then sell them for profit»

Under that program, power plant owners who installed equipment to scrub the sulfur dioxide out of the emissions from their smokestacks could then sell for a profit any leftover allowances to other polluters unable or unwilling to make the pricey upgrades.

Flipping a house is the sum of purchasing homes under market value, fixing them up, and then selling for a profit.

They buy cards in hopes that one day they will appreciate in value (perhaps due to stellar performance / popularity of that player) and then sell them for a profit.

Some folks have chosen to «flip» houses by buying homes in need of repair, repairing them, and then selling them for a profit.

He said requiring pet stores or distributors to buy those animals and then sell them for a profit based on market needs will both maintain the principals of commerce, address the puppy mill issue and help resolve the growing problem of lost or abandoned animals.

He eventually bought out the owners of the dog business, ran it for a few years and then sold it for a profit, right before the market crashed in September of 2008.

But I don't think they are operating like some other collectors, who bought household names, promoted them and then sold them for a profit.»

Under that program, power plant owners who installed equipment to scrub the sulfur dioxide out of the emissions from their smokestacks could then sell for a profit any leftover allowances to other polluters unable or unwilling to make the pricey upgrades.

In other words, if you put your own money into buying into a cryptocurrency with the hopes of its value rising so that you can then sell it for a profit - you're an investor.

If you plan only to buy a house, fix it up, then sell it for a profit, and you have the cash to get started, then you are well advised to use your cash.

Not exact matches

I then asked him why the seventy - five cents a case was so important, especially since he was selling a case for an eight - dollar profit.

I then invested that money into buying candy, to sell to other children for a profit.

Since then, Ross has also started Parakey which was sold to Facebook for a nice profit.

Then, in 2014, he sold the cottage for a profit.

Then you can sell them at the full price for an instant profit of $ 50 per share (minus the cost of the option and broker fees).

That note buyer will then begin collecting the monthly payments and decide if they will keep the note or try to sell it for profit.

Due to reciprocal and sponsored linking, these websites often have high authority which is then exploited for profit when website owners sell links.

Making a profit off the stock market most of the time comes with buying a stock, letting it grow, and then selling it for more than you paid originally, minus brokerage fees.

While holding a garment from Anthropologie that retails for around $ 100 but was selling for $ 4.99 at a thrift store, the same woman mentioned above announced her plans to buy it — and then flip it for a profit:

Arbitrage is the process of buying then immediately selling something for a profit.

The reseller purchases the host's services in wholesale and then sells them to customers, possibly for a profit.

What this means is that if the share price falls 2 % from the market price, then a sell order would be executed for you, allowing taking the profit at that time and leaving you with no risk on the downside.

For instance, if at the expiration of the put contract the stock reaches your $ 70 price target, you might then choose to sell the stock for a pretax profit of $ 1,700 ($ 2,000 profit on the underlying stock less the $ 300 cost of the option) and the option would expire worthleFor instance, if at the expiration of the put contract the stock reaches your $ 70 price target, you might then choose to sell the stock for a pretax profit of $ 1,700 ($ 2,000 profit on the underlying stock less the $ 300 cost of the option) and the option would expire worthlefor a pretax profit of $ 1,700 ($ 2,000 profit on the underlying stock less the $ 300 cost of the option) and the option would expire worthless.

She found an overseas supplier for high - quality scrapbooks and then she sold them online for a nice profit.

As I adjusted my China - silk tie (back then, I wore ties)-- sold at the mall for considerable profit; and as I kept my Egyptian cotton shirt clean of crumbs (sold at a major clothing store for additional profit)-- I waxed eloquent.

Dear Rev Blair you are not much better than Rev Camping (who you criticize) with all of your fear mongering of hell and torcher; then you have the nerve to be selling a book for profit about apocalyptic doomsday perdictions.

If you do not, then they keep it and can sell it for a profit.

Accolade is still 20 per cent owned by New York Stock Exchange - listed Constellation Brands which bought the entire wine business for $ 1.9 billion in 2003 when it was known as BRL Hardy, and then sold down most of its stake in 2011 for a much lower multiple after a sustained slump in profits as the high Australian dollar hit profit margins on exports.

According to Don Balon, Bayern have the option of signing him permanently for just # 37m, but would then consider selling him if they could make a profit, with an asking price of around # 53m.

Are we that pathetic that we will let Madrid buy him back and sell him on for double the cost for a massive profit and then put in a buy back clause so they can get a player once he has proven he is world class TO THEM.

Loaned out for years then Sold and recently bought back to sell on for a small profit, which back fired.??

@Fatboy Gooner The Ozil deal was far less that 40 plus million as has been exposed on football leaks it was more in the region of 32 million with verious clauses that enable REM to take a percentage of any profit we make on selling Ozil and I would assume there are similar attachments with the Sanchez deal, even our record signings are clouded in smoke and mirrors so let not run away with the idea that its all SWengers fault, if your employer is on your back and pushing for results then you perform at a higher rate and push harder where as Wenger has no push from above so does nt go out of his way Kroenke does nt have the culture around him to win trophies cos thats not his aim and that filters down to the grass roots at Arsenal and shows in Wengers transfer policy and in the players performance.

Gazidis has been selling the BS year after year about how much we have to spend and then fail to get the managers targets, ending the transfer window in profit while Wenger was given 33 % of what he asked for!

Score loads for Crystal Palace and either; Come back, play more, prove your place or Wenger sell him in summer and take the profit then spend on new striker.

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

We should all know that Kroenke is the biggest problem as he has no ambition to win any trophies but the chances of him selling to usmanov or anyone else are 0 at this point so the next change thats needed is to get rid of wenger but since the kroenke only cares about profit and wenger is perfect for idiot for that, then i guess our only two options are to keep supporting the team or stop attending games or watching them to avoid the same agony as we have been for the past 10 years or more.

I just hope we don't end up keeping them for this campaign and then accepting to sell at large profits.

If we pressured Gazidis sooner then he may have made these changes sooner, letting him go under the radar just allowed him to sell top players for profit and go to his boss showing profit and asking how much of a good boy he is.

Nasri didn't want to go, he was promised that he wouldn't be sold in the same window as Cesc by Wenger and then he was told by the board that he had been sold, Nasri blames Silent Stan for wanting to sell him for a guaranteed profit that they may lose if we fail to get CL football... # 25mil.

Oh and if Monaco's model is selling for profit then why couldn't arsenal buy from that selling club like everyone else?

If we look at when Gazidis was hired and by who then we get a better image of what happened, he was hired by the old board after 2 billionaires acquired shares in AFC and after Chelsea was sold for nice profit.

I feel if we have a bad season then kroenke will lose money might have to do a Milan in order to get back where we belong the board and wenger are selling deadwood and use it to post a huge profit to line their pockets What is going on with mustafi why are we loaning him out, why did we sell Gabriel After Sunday why would any of our targets come to us The players have stopped playing for wenger and are leaving for ambition not money This is a new low for wenger and he ruined his Leah's you by extending your in the summer

The great thing about getting young talented players is that if they are needed (ie Bellerin) we use them, if not then we can sell them for a profit.

Pay less then sell one or two matches for a major profit, to reduce your overall cost.

Stan is a sports investment businessman and no doubt a very good one who has profited, in my opinion hill - wood who sold the fans down the river is to blame for selling his shares (along with the rest of the board then - it was only Bracewell - Smith who admitted she sold to the wrong person) wenger as an employee of Arsenal fc has done everything what the club needs ie finish forth, however I do honestly believe with a different more tactically astute manager we would be in a better place now and maybe even won the league last season

May as well sell oil to Barcelona for 55 mill today just to fill your pockets even more after all profit is more important then success to a greedy yank and a deluded clueless manager!!!

I disagree with u ryan the playwrs we got from southampton hve been so inconsistant and u then you say origi ings etc were bought at a steal and will be worth more in time to come so u agree with fsg policy buy potential and once they become better players sell them for a profit sorry but thats my opinion we need to hold on to the better players than compliment them with other great players fsg have turned liverpool into a selling club to fill there bck pockets this was never the liverpool way and now because of this fsg policy is the reason were mid table klopp needs to be given the funds he needs to change things only then can we judge him i just hope he is given the chance before he decides to walk YNWA

Burnley chairman Mike Garlick has admitted that the club's model is to unearth talent, produce players for the first - team and then sell them on for a substantial profit.

You will sign for them, being loaned for the next four years, then sold at profit without having played for them.

If that assumption is correct, then selling a player who will be 29 in March for a profit seems like a very sensible move.