Sentences with phrase «then spoke to the people»

Hinn then speaks to the person and may ask them to perform some kind of action to confirm the healing.

I then spoke to the people and was tasked to find them help.

He then spoke to his people, recognising how «important White men» had come to return their land and how in the future the Gurindji could live together with white fellas as friends and equals.

Not exact matches

Consumers can feed in the dimensions of their deck and then furnish it from a menu of items with a drag - and - drop interface that allows them to do a walk - through of the chosen arrangement — first - person virtual lounging, so to speak.

«Bands always, always hire by values first and once the person looks right, feels right, speaks the same language, then he's allowed to get up and jam with the band,» he says.

(Or in nonresearcher speak, when you think other people will like you, you act more naturally and come across as friendlier — which then makes people like you more since we tend to like warm, friendly people.)

«Yes, the info in the blogs is bad, false, and misleading but the rationale is that «if it gets the people to click on it and engage, then use it,»» said a university student in Veles who started a US politics site, and who agreed to speak on the condition that BuzzFeed News not use his name.

Since then, I've had the opportunity to speak to sports business University programs, consult with major brands regarding online marketing and social media, and connect people in the industry.

If they speak to a rude customer assistant or sales person or they find your store is messy, then it is less likely that they will make a purchase.

Last October, Nisha Garigarn, co-founder of Croissant, spoke with us about the back then newly launched app and how they (the founders) hoped to see Croissant change the way people find and use coworking spaces.

So, by your reasoning, if «People put so much importance on words» (implying that they don't matter and we shouldn't take thought of how we use them) then I ought to be able to sing along with the lyrics from pac's «hit»em up» with my black friends, curse in a kindergarten class as well as a corporate meeting for my boss... what impression would a client have of my boss if I were cussing in a professional meeting or at a charity event... it doesn't add up, it's a cop - out rebuttal... trying to find loopholes or applying «human reasoning» like» ll take a swearing guy who's helpful» doesn't change Jesus or scripture it's just setting up a what - if scenario and trying to allow that to in some way justify your stance when again, that doesn't change The Holy Spirit or His heart in those who have been born again... the verses (inspired by His own Spirit) speak for themselves.

But if we dare to say «we found Him» — then, our «religion» should be enriching all people, giving to all people, open to all people, speaking of eternal life, and not condemning any.

And then people have every right to speak up in disagreement.

The most loving thing that you can do to a dying person is talk to them about forgiveness through Jesus and seeing him on the other side, and then trusting the Holy Spirit to do his work while you speak.

If the voice is just inside your head, then it has to be your own, as there is no evidence that people can speak telepathically.

I find it amusing that you say, «And then people have every right to speak up in disagreement.»

Hypothetically speaking, what if some people flog you with a cat of 9 tails whip until you have so much flesh ripped off that you are a living, breathing, walking zombie and then make you carry a massive cross about 5 miles and then nail you to that cross?

Speaking on Premier's News Hour, he said: «We have a responsibility to talk about it because everybody else is, and if our young people can't find out what's right and wrong and what's healthy and what's good from us, then they'll just go somewhere else.

It is sad that there are so many people that believe the myth of «if this person is speaking from a pulpit, then they are speaking truth» and don't bother to do any fact checking.

How can you make such an ignorant and blatant «over-generalization'to claim this fallacious If / then logic which goes like this... (If) you disrespect (a)(muslim)... (THEN)(they) kill 3,000 people., blah blah, blah... So... If I should go out and disrespect a muslim, which I wouldn't do, but if I would (hypothetically speaking) 3,000 people are going to diethen logic which goes like this... (If) you disrespect (a)(muslim)... (THEN)(they) kill 3,000 people., blah blah, blah... So... If I should go out and disrespect a muslim, which I wouldn't do, but if I would (hypothetically speaking) 3,000 people are going to dieTHEN)(they) kill 3,000 people., blah blah, blah... So... If I should go out and disrespect a muslim, which I wouldn't do, but if I would (hypothetically speaking) 3,000 people are going to die...?

If you are speaking of «practicing» lesbians, that is, people who are openly practicing sin, then in many cases they cry «unfriendly, unkind, adversarial» intolerant when they are spoken to about their open sin.

YOU: If you are speaking of «practicing» lesbians, that is, people who are openly practicing sin, then in many cases they cry «unfriendly, unkind, adversarial» intolerant when they are spoken to about their open sin.

There is no evidence of a God and many of us have seen belief in God sometimes lead to bad things — probably because people assign power to God and then speak on his behalf (they «hear» what he says).

That he came to let us know that we are loved and if someone speaks to us about the sin in our life then that person is not being «loving».

If you were a real Christian you would know Christs words speak for themselves and the fact that he didn't take the sword away and turn it into a pruning shear right then and there does not mean he was saying «I mean all this stuff is for later after I come back and kill all the evil people and those who haven't accepted me as their savior so you won't have to fear anyone so you can finally give up your guns and weapons of war...» You disgust me chad.

Good question... If the person speaking from the pulpit is commited to pursuing holiness, then I believe that they are speaking for God.

Then staying within context we read verses 11 and 12...» 11 For with stammering lips and another tongue will he speak to this people.

God will get the attention of this people, but it will be in different ways then He would speak to those in poor countries.

Some volunteers then take to the surrounding streets to speak with the people they meet, going out in pairs with large lanterns — a great way to draw attention and spark curiosity.

«Son of man, speak to the children of your people, and say to them: «When I bring the sword upon a land, and the people of the land take a man from their territory and make him their watchman, when he sees the sword coming upon the land, if he blows the trumpet and warns the people, then whoever hears the sound of the trumpet and does not take warning, if the sword comes and takes him away, his blood shall be on his own head.

Then he sent letters to all the king's provinces, to each province in its own script, and to every people in their own language, that each man should be master in his own house, and speak in the language of his own people.

Indeed, it is You who is Knower of the unseen» (109)[The Day] when Allah will say, «O Jesus, Son of Mary, remember My favor upon you and upon your mother when I supported you with the Pure Spirit and you spoke to the people in the cradle and in maturity; and [remember] when I taught you writing and wisdom and the Torah and the Gospel; and when you designed from clay [what was] like the form of a bird with My permission, then you breathed into it, and it became a bird with My permission; and you healed the blind and the leper with My permission; and when you brought forth the dead with My permission; and when I restrained the Children of Israel from [killing] you when you came to them with clear proofs and those who disbelieved among them said, «This is not but obvious magic.»

I have tried to read books and internet to get some clarification of the bible, I think well this person would be good to learn from because they are so knowledgeable about the Bible and then they speak about faith and works and I get so confused all over again.

If non-believers fail to speak out against procedures that have no basis in reality, e.g. exorcism, and someone dies that could have been saved, then they missed an opportunity to make one person's life a little bit longer and this world a little bit better.

Imagine how many people would have come to hear him speak of peace then, a man that rose from the grave and could not die again..

When the theologians begin to follow the lead of symposiasts Alicia Mosier and Janet E. Smith, i.e., elucidating the instruction of the one person on earth whose charism is infallibility, then we can speak of prophets.

Then he speaks in first person to me and, he says «I see your sin, but I also see your heart, I have not forsaken you, nor have I rejected you».

The Elohist document reveals a much more Protestant one: God spoke directly to the people, who then elected their representatives.

It takes a lot of courage for me to speak out like this and if all this does is give hope to one person so they man or woman would be enabeld to got help for healing and / or someone who is mistreating think twice about what they are doing then I will have provided a service.

A friend who was a counselor before she retired and who knew from work one of the main problems in that church, sat me down one day and talked to me about what it had been like to work with that woman and how everyone saw that woman, and then my friend gave me this article to read that she had learned and used while she was still in practice before she retired: https://glynissherwood.com/12-steps-to-breaking-free-from-being-the-family-scapegoat/ This article speaks about family, but my friend told me it can be applied to any dysfunctional group of people.

For me I do believe in the Sacraments and the role they play in Salvation - Jesus did change wine into this blood and the bread into his body during the last supper and told believers to do this in his memory and he did foreshadow what would happen on the Cross he gave up his life so we maybe could be saved, because not all who profess Christ is Lord or believe in God will be saved, there are many people who claim they can abuse, sleep around, steal, cheat and that they'll still go to heave because 1 day they said the sinner's prayer, actions speak louder then words.

If you're ministering what God said, which is in Greek and Hebrew, to people who speak Spanish, then how could you claim that any of the three languages is dispensable?

But these same people you speak of are also the ones that will say they're «pro-life» but then be pro death penalty (though I'm not against the death penalty myself in certain cases) and usually are all ready to go to war, don't support programs that help these children once they are born, etc..

If Jeremiah 29 is speaking to the nation of Israel, and not just one person, then we should start with the truth in the Scriptures.

The individual, in fantasy, puts the person with whom he or she has unfinished feelings, in an empty chair and then alternately speaks to and for that person, moving back and forth from one chair to the other in the process.

For instance, when Yeshua is speaking to the people and says, «You have heard it said..., but I say unto you...,» I had always been told that he was, «quoting the Law and then saying that it doesn't apply anymore.»

Speaking about the teaching and practice surrounding sexuality, Archbishop Peter said: «The Communique seems deliberately to step around the real problem and then offer blame to the people who are really in a sense the victims.

If it is good enough for Jesus to be baptised then its good enough reason for me to as well that was why i wanted to be baptised.He says that it was necessary to fulfill all righteousness verse 15 in that sense he could have been talking of fulfilling the requirements of the law and in Jesus we fulfill the requirements of the law.I do nt believe that it is neccesary step to be saved as some of the gentile believers Peter spoke to received the holy spirit before they were baptised.Its a good picture of the old being washed away and we are raised up as a new person in Christ.When i was baptised in the holy spirit and spoke in tongues it was exactly like a water baptism i felt the water washing over me as it washed i just started speaking in tongues.brentnz

Tana December 7, 2011 5:29 pm ------ Tana, I can't speak for Sam, but for me and my experiences, that is before I became a Christian at 33, then later became a pastor at 50, and now a pastor for 14 years, I have seen and see now untold numbers of people who hang on to the victimhood with a tight grip.

Where scriptural text, with its own social dynamics, interacts with preacher and people in social context at the preaching moment, then God speaks from that swirl as surely as Yahweh spoke to Job from the whirlwind.