Sentences with phrase «then use the points for»

But if you have one of those cards and one of the travel cards above, you can transfer the points to the travel card and then use the points for flights.

Then use the points for inexpensive stays at IHG PointsBreaks hotels, which cost just 5,000 IHG points per night.

But if you have one of those cards and one of the travel cards above, you can transfer the points to the travel card and then use the points for flights.

You can then use your points for rewards that really are unique.

If you book the 3 free nights that you get, then use points for a 4th night, will you get 5th night complimentary?

Not exact matches

These celebrities filed for bankruptcy protection at some point — and then used their talents to recover.

PWC then pulled out details to grade 75 cities using a decimal point scale up to five, for each area's capacity for real estate investment, development and homebuilding.

For hotels, Laura used Hilton certificates for the Waldorf Astoria in Amsterdam and then Chase Ultimate Rewards points transferred to Hyatt for the Hotel du Louvre in ParFor hotels, Laura used Hilton certificates for the Waldorf Astoria in Amsterdam and then Chase Ultimate Rewards points transferred to Hyatt for the Hotel du Louvre in Parfor the Waldorf Astoria in Amsterdam and then Chase Ultimate Rewards points transferred to Hyatt for the Hotel du Louvre in Parfor the Hotel du Louvre in Paris.

To get a rate of 4.2 %, users must use the card to exclusively make Expedia.com purchases, and then redeem their reward on + VIP Access hotels — exchanging points for ordinary rate hotel coupons will drop the rewards rate down to 2.1 %.

Rather than getting points for your purchases and then using those points to get various merchandise or travel rewards, you get actual money back (most of the time in the form of a statement credit).

Don't get me wrong, if there is a gasoline rewards credit card that is worth more to you than 2 travel points per $ 1 then, by all means, apply for it and use it for when you buy gas.

Use language appropriate to the visitor based on the target audience Heat maps show an F pattern is used when scanning content, so using bold headings and sub-headings to make it easier to scan and break up a copy Change paragraphs to bulleted lists Put the main point first (inverted pyramid) Use personal pronouns Put yourself in the place of the visitor and consider questions the visitor may have, then get to the point with the answer Add links, if appropriate, to keep the visitor engaged on your site and to keep them from searching elsewhere Name links (and anchor text) in a way that the visitor will know what to expect when they click Find out what keywords visitors are searching for to reach your site and write with these keywords in mind These tips are a great starting point for anyone wanting to optimize their website content.

Alden has several Chase ® cards and likes that «you can use whichever card is best for the situation, and then group your points together and send them to the rewards program that will offer the greatest benefits.»

Facebook concedes they might not have gotten proper notice so Facebook sent emails to their private addresses they used for their Facebook accounts, but then followed up with their public email contact points.

Considering that 98 % of catholic women report to have used birth control at one point in their lifetime, then I'd say she can speak for catholics..

For the over-all result of the great reaction has been a sophistication of the true simplicity of the gospel, the use of a jargon which the common man (and the intelligent one, too, often enough) can not understand, and a tendency to assume that the biblical and creedal language as it stands need only be spoken, and enough then has been done to state and communicate the point of the Christian proclamation.

The easiest access point for most is to say that because God IS love, then God's very nature is loving, and so God's use of power is not coercive - it is persuasive (almost seductive).

If this writer was such a non-believer then why doesn't she realize that there are rational, realistic reasons for not being an alcoholic and wouldn't need to use some «higher power» as a crutch to understand that when you do anything to the point where it physically damages your body then it's time to realize that you've taken it too far?

When we add the obvious point that the term itself is very frequently to be found in the synoptic tradition and comparatively infrequently outside it, then it becomes clear that we are fully entitled to claim that the real and significant differences between the use within the synoptic tradition and outside it call for an explanation.

Calvinists often point to this text, and then make the comparison between it and passages like James 2:6 and Acts 16:19 which uses the same word for «dragging» or «compelling» people to go where they do not want to go.

Oakes uses the analogy to show the limitations of the argument from design as a theological starting point, but he then mistakenly assumes that it is for that reason that Johnson appeals to the Logos of John 1:1 as, so to speak, a deus ex machina.

Using the 1974 Filer Commission religion estimate of $ 11.7 billion as a base point, and then using available denominational data on giving, a series of annual figures for the years 1968 through 1973 and 1975 through 1995 can be calculUsing the 1974 Filer Commission religion estimate of $ 11.7 billion as a base point, and then using available denominational data on giving, a series of annual figures for the years 1968 through 1973 and 1975 through 1995 can be calculusing available denominational data on giving, a series of annual figures for the years 1968 through 1973 and 1975 through 1995 can be calculated.

If, as we shall argue below, this text is not the first use in Christian tradition, then we would substitute another text for Mark 13.26, but the essential point would remain the same: this double emphasis is first known to us from a Christian text.)

As you point out from the story of Eliashib, for those churches that consider the tithe an Old Testament mandate, then should not the tithe be used in the manner prescribed there, rather than for buying large properties, covering them with multiple buildings, and in the case of many megachurch pastors and associates, giving them six figure salaries that go far beyond providing for their needs?

when people get all huffy over my misuse of words or just plain wrong use of them i laugh, because i can bet my life that you still understood my meaning but rather then discuss the issue i brought up chose to insult thru the means of an english teacher — that i care not for... my point was a valid one and it makes me sad that you think yourself so far above me that you won't even bother with the conversation... tisk tisk.

On the left are my roasted tomatoes from 2010 in what appears to be a very photogenic Tupperware container... Back then I used an ancient point - and - shoot camera which I bought in 2004 and used for so long that eventually every cell phone was being manufactured with a better camera than what I was working with.

1) Pre-heat oven to 300 deg Fahrenheit (150 deg cel) 2) Line one large baking sheet (0r two medium baking sheets) with parchment paper 3) In a large bowl, combine the oats, chia seeds, flax seeds, raisins, almonds and other nuts, and mix well 4) In a smaller bowl, whisk together the honey, light brown sugar, melted butter and cinnamon until smooth and sugar has dissolved 5) Pour the honey mixture over the dry ingredients and stir well until you get a homogeneous mixture 6) Pour the mixture over the baking sheets and spread evenly with a spatula, then season lightly with sea salt 7) Bake for 15 minutes, then stir the granola gently (to make sure all sides are cooked) 8) At this point, you may need to switch the baking sheets (if you are using 2) so the granola cooks evenly 9) Bake for another 15 minutes, then stir again, before cooking for a final 15 minutes or until golden brown 10) Remove granola from the oven and place on cooking racks until completely cool and crisp 11) Store granola in air - tight containers at room temperature.

They then examined the data for past use of hot peppers, one of the 34 unusual foods, on a 4 - point scale with 1 equal to «I have never eaten this» to 4 for «Eaten it many times.»

I provide the nutrition information for my readers who do not use the Weight Watchers program, but if you're following SmartPoints then I would recommend using the recipe builder to determine the points for your recipes.

Points will then be awarded for the recipe, ingredients used, methodology and presentation of the spoon serving.

Grain whisky would be the starting point for me when creating a new blend, as grain whisky defines the style of the blend, then you can move it in different directions using malts.

«Every organization is at a different point in the sustainability journey so our program allows businesses to use their own baselines to determine a set of goals based on their region, operation and other factors, and then focus their resources on the practices that will make the most difference for their company, the environment and the community, continually improving year after year.»

Key points if you like your Chili thick (ie to put in tortillas etc): - Do nt add the beer - Do nt use brisket (lean stewing beef instead)- Roast the butternut squash ahead of time, before adding to dish - Cook ahead one day and then reheat for when you want to eat it.

It may happen in tropical cultures where they want to change the melting point from 75 degrees to over 100 degrees to keep it solid, but even then they would use it as an ingredient in processed foods, not sell it as an edible oil for cooking.

Eventually, I got to a point where I started using it to make frozen candies, caramel dip for fruit, and then just eating them plain with a big dollop of peanut butter.

These young guns will only get a chance to prove themselves at top level if and only if arsenal make massive signings that will give us a major trophy... if we are for example leading the league in like seven points in February, then we can afford to give them some minutes on field but they wont get game time on the current team cz the manager realizes that the club needs trophies and hez running out of time so i even doubt he will use them in capital one cup... Good luck boys

This is on what these two are truly arguing; Wenger uses the cup as an example against Neville but Neville isn't really belittling our ability to win games, but rather, that in the long run of a whole season it is more likely for us to drop points due to relying purely on skill which is far more linked to form then something like physicality.

If you want to use Everton as an example for Costa then Giroud's goals against them secured 4 points in 2 games.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

How can you scout for a player then buy them and not use them, I mean what is the point as you're just wasting resources.

(At this point we pause while your correspondent first begs forgiveness, then soundly birches himself, for using calendar year divisions in an article about football, as though the earth's predictable orbit around the sun had anything to do with Arsenal's predictable orbit around the Premier League trophy.

If North Carolina is a 3 - point favorite over Duke with the juice at -115, then you would use -115 for x in the in the second formula.

Minus some flashes from both Sead and Iwobi, and a workingman - like effort from Elneny, we learned very little... so here are a few of my observations from today's game, which highlight my concerns about this team moving forward... the fact that Mertz started this game, regardless of our injuries or those being «rested», should be a serious red flag for any true Arsenal fan... if Wenger is preparing to use Mertz with any regularity then the whole thing is a moot point because we are in deep shit... the fact is no quality team would ever have this tin soldier anywhere near there starting eleven except to groom their youthful players, who in turn should be playing in this type of game instead... I can only hope he was simply throwing him a bone for the FA appearance and for agreeing to stay on following the season, but I think the most likely answer is that Wenger's fragile relationship with the fan - base can't be ignored so he felt his experience was a safer bet... unfortunately not a positive choice for a team trying to move forward (same old, same old)

Personally I would say the guy just ain't worth it.That money can be used more wisely to get what we need.Lemar shouldn't have been a priority.The centre of the park should have been the problem.We are missing the point clearly.Even Bernardo Silva is as good as him yet went for lower.I've watched him and I know eventually he'll be world class but that doesn't mean he should be worth that bid because we have players his age wiyh more potential and cheaper.I remember people stating how Lacazette was not even worth # 45 some seasons back then all of a sudden he's signed for higher and people are behaving like they already like him.I'm sure the logic was that he was in the French league and possibly can't cut it at the top.This isn't money well spent at all.

And # 2 the apparel companies have created their own market, they know what avenues to use — twitter, instagram, etc. to build up «excitement» and then point to all the recruits who love it, which in turn is a second reason for schools to get on board with it.

The World Alliance for Breastfeeding Action points out that «When feeding bottles are used in public for fear of public exposure of breasts, or when women's reasons for choosing bottle - feeding include fears that breastfeeding will alter the shape of their breasts, then women are being treated as sex objects.

You can start using it as a rear - facing infant car seat for kids from 4 — 40 pounds, then transition it to a to forward - facing 5 - point harness seat (for kids 22 — 65 pounds).

Alternatively, if they're able to get out of the protective area, then it's time to stop using it at that point for safety reasons.

Once a chore is completed, they can add the points to their account and either use them to buy something right then, save them for something bigger, or even donate them to a charity.

Parents love the nonslip rubber pads that adhere to the chair and the three - point harness that can be used for younger kids, then removed when they get older.